Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Conlon 2021 more extremal number subdivisions

../

corollary_1_13: For all integers s, k >= 1 there is t_0(s,k) such that ex(n, L_{s,t}(k)) = Theta(n^{1+s/(sk+1)}) for every t >= t_0, so each 1 + s/(sk+1) is realised by a single bipartite graph and 1 + 1/k is a limit point of the realisable exponents.

corollary_1_9: For every integer s >= 2 there is t_0(s) such that the 1-subdivision of K_{s,t} has extremal number Theta(n^{3/2-1/(2s)}) for every t >= t_0, so each 3/2 - 1/(2s) is realised by a single bipartite graph.

corollary_7_2: For all integers s, k, p >= 1 the exponent 2 - (sk+1)/(p(sk+1)+s) is balancedly realisable, and, letting s grow, every 2 - a/b with b > a and b congruent to 1 mod a is a limit point of the realisable exponents.

proposition_1_17: For all integers s, k >= 1 there is t_0(s,k) such that the (k-1)-subdivision of K_{s,t} has extremal number Omega(n^{1+(s-1)/(sk)}) for every t >= t_0, so the upper bound of Theorem 1.16 is nearly tight.

theorem_1_12: Conlon, Janzer and Lee's theorem that the graph L_{s,t}(k), the (k-1)-subdivision of K_{s,t} with an extra vertex joined to the part of size t, has extremal number O(n^{1+s/(sk+1)}) for all integers s, t, k >= 1.

theorem_1_16: Conlon, Janzer and Lee's theorem that the (k-1)-subdivision of K_{s,t} has extremal number O(n^{1+s/(sk+1)}) for all integers s, t, k >= 1, so for every bipartite H some delta > 0 gives ex(n, H^{k-1}) = O(n^{1+1/k-delta}), the Conlon-Lee conjecture for bipartite H.

theorem_1_18: Conlon, Janzer and Lee's theorem that for every graph H and every even integer k >= 2 there is delta > 0 with ex(n, H^{k-1}) = O(n^{1+2/k-delta}), improving the Jiang-Seiver bound O(n^{1+16/k}).

theorem_1_4: Conlon, Janzer and Lee's theorem that a bipartite graph H in which all degrees in one part are at most r and which contains no 4-cycle satisfies ex(n,H) = o(n^{2-1/r}), improving the Füredi and Alon-Krivelevich-Sudakov bound by a factor tending to zero.

theorem_1_8: Conlon, Janzer and Lee's theorem that the 1-subdivision of K_{s,t} has extremal number O(n^{3/2-1/(2s)}) for all integers 2 <= s <= t, the case of complete bipartite graphs of a conjecture of Kang, Kim and Liu.


Conlon, David and Janzer, Oliver and Lee, Joonkyung, More on the extremal number of subdivisions. Combinatorica 41 (2021), 465-494, DOI 10.1007/s00493-020-4202-1. The copy read for this card is arXiv:1903.10631v2, dated 25 April 2020, with 21 pages; the labels and pages cited below are that manuscript's, and the journal typesetting was not compared with it. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1903.10631), every other right reserved.

Writing Ks,t′K'_{s,t} for the 1-subdivision of Ks,tK_{s,t}, the paper proves ex(n,Ks,t′)=O(n3/2−1/(2s))\mathrm{ex}(n,K'_{s,t})=O(n^{3/2-1/(2s)}) for all integers 2≤s≤t2\le s\le t (Theorem 1.8, p. 2), proving the case of complete bipartite graphs of a conjecture of Kang, Kim and Liu (their general Conjecture 1.7, p. 2, is not proved), tight up to the constant for tt large in terms of ss (Corollary 1.9, p. 2). Second, writing Ls,t(k)L_{s,t}(k) for the (k−1)(k-1)-subdivision of Ks,tK_{s,t} with an extra vertex joined to every vertex of the part of size tt, it proves ex(n,Ls,t(k))=O(n1+s/(sk+1))\mathrm{ex}(n,L_{s,t}(k))=O(n^{1+s/(sk+1)}) for all integers s,t,k≥1s,t,k\ge1 (Theorem 1.12, p. 3), with Θ\Theta for t≥t0(s,k)t\ge t_0(s,k) (Corollary 1.13, p. 3), which the paper calls a complete resolution of Problem 5.2 of Kang, Kim and Liu; this yields infinitely many new realisable exponents for the Erdős--Simonovits rational exponents conjecture (Conjecture 1.10, p. 2) and makes 1+1/k1+1/k a limit point of realisable exponents for every k≥1k\ge1. Since Ks,tk−1K_{s,t}^{k-1} is a subgraph of Ls,t(k)L_{s,t}(k), for any bipartite HH and any kk there is δ>0\delta>0 with ex(n,Hk−1)=O(n1+1/k−δ)\mathrm{ex}(n,H^{k-1})=O(n^{1+1/k-\delta}) (Theorem 1.16, p. 4), the Conlon--Lee Conjecture 1.15 for bipartite HH; Proposition 1.17 (p. 4) gives the lower bound ex(n,Ks,tk−1)=Ω(n1+(s−1)/(sk))\mathrm{ex}(n,K_{s,t}^{k-1})=\Omega(n^{1+(s-1)/(sk)}) for large tt, and Theorem 1.18 (p. 4) gives O(n1+2/k−δ)O(n^{1+2/k-\delta}) for every graph HH and even k≥2k\ge2. Third, extending Conlon--Lee, Theorem 1.4 (p. 2) shows that a bipartite HH with all degrees at most rr in one part and no C4C_4 satisfies ex(n,H)=o(n2−1/r)\mathrm{ex}(n,H)=o(n^{2-1/r}). The proof of Theorem 1.4 uses ideas from Janzer's simpler proof of the Conlon--Lee subdivision bound (p. 2), and the proof of Theorem 1.8 uses a consequence of a lemma of Janzer (Lemma 4.3, p. 10). The concluding remarks (pp. 19--20) add Corollary 7.2, further balancedly realisable exponents, and pose Problem 7.3 and Conjectures 7.4 and 7.5. The realisable-exponent results are the contribution cited for problem 571, the Erdős--Simonovits rational exponents conjecture.

Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.10631.

Read status: claims checked for Theorems 1.4, 1.8, 1.12, 1.16 and 1.18, Corollaries 1.9, 1.13 and 7.2 and Proposition 1.17, with the definitions and the recalled results of pp. 1--4 and 19--20, read clause by clause on the page images; the deductions of Corollaries 1.9 and 1.13 and Proposition 1.17 from Lemma 2.4 (pp. 11 and 19) were read; the proofs of Theorems 1.4, 1.8 and 1.12 (Sections 3, 4 and 6) were read for structure only. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #571: Corollary 1.9 realises each α=32−12s\alpha=\frac32-\frac1{2s}, s≥2s\ge2, by the single bipartite graph Ks,t′K'_{s,t} with t≥t0(s)t\ge t_0(s); Corollary 1.13 realises each α=1+ssk+1\alpha=1+\frac{s}{sk+1}, s,k≥1s,k\ge1, by Ls,t(k)L_{s,t}(k) with t≥t0(s,k)t\ge t_0(s,k); and Corollary 7.2 states that each 2−sk+1p(sk+1)+s2-\frac{sk+1}{p(sk+1)+s}, s,k,p≥1s,k,p\ge1, is balancedly realisable, with a one-sentence derivation. Each covers its family of exponents only; the upper bounds are Theorem 1.8 and Theorem 1.12.

Results.

  • Theorem 1.4 (p. 2): ex(n,H)=o(n2−1/r)\mathrm{ex}(n,H)=o(n^{2-1/r}) for bipartite HH with all degrees at most rr in one part and no C4C_4.
  • Theorem 1.8 (p. 2): ex(n,Ks,t′)=O(n3/2−1/(2s))\mathrm{ex}(n,K'_{s,t})=O(n^{3/2-1/(2s)}) for integers 2≤s≤t2\le s\le t.
  • Corollary 1.9 (p. 2): ex(n,Ks,t′)=Θ(n3/2−1/(2s))\mathrm{ex}(n,K'_{s,t})=\Theta(n^{3/2-1/(2s)}) for s≥2s\ge2 and t≥t0(s)t\ge t_0(s).
  • Theorem 1.12 (p. 3): ex(n,Ls,t(k))=O(n1+s/(sk+1))\mathrm{ex}(n,L_{s,t}(k))=O(n^{1+s/(sk+1)}) for integers s,t,k≥1s,t,k\ge1.
  • Corollary 1.13 (p. 3): ex(n,Ls,t(k))=Θ(n1+s/(sk+1))\mathrm{ex}(n,L_{s,t}(k))=\Theta(n^{1+s/(sk+1)}) for s,k≥1s,k\ge1 and t≥t0(s,k)t\ge t_0(s,k); 1+1/k1+1/k is a limit point of realisable exponents.
  • Theorem 1.16 (p. 4): ex(n,Ks,tk−1)=O(n1+s/(sk+1))\mathrm{ex}(n,K_{s,t}^{k-1})=O(n^{1+s/(sk+1)}) for s,t,k≥1s,t,k\ge1, so ex(n,Hk−1)=O(n1+1/k−δ)\mathrm{ex}(n,H^{k-1})=O(n^{1+1/k-\delta}) for bipartite HH and some δ>0\delta>0.
  • Proposition 1.17 (p. 4): ex(n,Ks,tk−1)=Ω(n1+(s−1)/(sk))\mathrm{ex}(n,K_{s,t}^{k-1})=\Omega(n^{1+(s-1)/(sk)}) for s,k≥1s,k\ge1 and t≥t0(s,k)t\ge t_0(s,k).
  • Theorem 1.18 (p. 4): ex(n,Hk−1)=O(n1+2/k−δ)\mathrm{ex}(n,H^{k-1})=O(n^{1+2/k-\delta}) for every graph HH and even k≥2k\ge2.
  • Corollary 7.2 (p. 20): 2−sk+1p(sk+1)+s2-\frac{sk+1}{p(sk+1)+s} is balancedly realisable for s,k,p≥1s,k,p\ge1.
  • Context, not given pages: Theorem 1.3 (Conlon--Lee, p. 2), ex(n,Kt′)=O(n3/2−1/6t)\mathrm{ex}(n,K'_t)=O(n^{3/2-1/6^t}) for t≥3t\ge3, and Theorem 1.5 (Janzer, p. 2), O(n3/2−14t−6)O(n^{3/2-\frac{1}{4t-6}}).

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.