Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
is as on Theorem 3 (p. 269).
Theorem 10 (p. 275). There exists a positive constant such that for each constant , ,
With Theorem 8 and display (18), the authors say (p. 274) that this shows both lower bounds, for and for , to be best possible when lower-order terms are omitted.
Source. Richard A. Duke, Paul Erdős and Vojtěch Rödl, Cycle-connected graphs, Discrete Math. 108 (1992), 261--278, doi:10.1016/0012-365X(92)90680-E; the star-system definition and Lemma 9 on printed p. 275, Theorem 10 on p. 275 and its proof on pp. 275--277, read on the page images of the publisher's scan. The edition read is identified in the source digest.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, the definition and Lemma 9 were read clause by clause on the page image. The proof was read for structure only.
Proof pointer
Pages 275--277. Delete each edge of independently with probability . By Lemma 9 a -connected set of size , the larger of the two terms, contains a star system of degree with at least edges, ; split its stars into two halves of nearly equal edge count. For the edge set to be -connected, every vertex of a star in one half must, for each star of the other half, keep its edge to that star's centre or its edges to all of that star's leaves; with at least edges in each half this has probability less than (displays (19)--(20)); a union bound over star systems (displays (21)--(23)) finishes for .
Dependencies
Definition and Lemma 9 (p. 275). For a set of edges of , a star system of degree in is a collection of vertex-disjoint stars of , each with at most edges, all in . Lemma 9: if has vertices and , then for each positive integer there is a star system of degree in with edges, where .
Bears on
No problem page is reached by this theorem: it concerns -cycles in graphs missing edges, and no problem the corpus records asks about them.