Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
is as on Theorem 3 (p. 269). The authors say (p. 273) that Theorem 6 and its sharpness argument give a function with values between and such that for each positive constant (the print has "" for the first "" in that sentence, a misprint corrected by the statement of Theorem 7), that Lemma 4 gives , and that display (13) gives for , an absolute constant.
Theorem 7 (p. 273). Let be the function defined by . Then .
A Remark after the proof (p. 274) combines display (16) with the bound after Theorem 6: for sufficiently large ,
with as . The authors think the lower bound closer to the right order and say they can prove this for , (see Theorem 10). The introduction (p. 263) writes the same function as and states and with decreasing.
Source. Richard A. Duke, Paul Erdős and Vojtěch Rödl, Cycle-connected graphs, Discrete Math. 108 (1992), 261--278, doi:10.1016/0012-365X(92)90680-E; Theorem 7 and the paragraph before it on printed p. 273, the proof on pp. 273--274 and the Remark on p. 274, read on the page images of the publisher's scan. The edition read is identified in the source digest.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the Remark were read clause by clause on the page images. The proof was read for structure only.
Proof pointer
Pages 273--274. For even, fix a one-factorization of into perfect matchings and delete a uniformly random set of edges. A set of at least edges meets some matching in at least edges; two edges , of one matching lie on a common -cycle only if or survives the deletion. A union bound over matchings and edge subsets (displays (14)--(15)) shows that, for sufficiently large and (display (16)), some choice of leaves no -connected set of edges.
Dependencies
Theorem 6 for the existence of with positive values.
Bears on
No problem page is reached by this theorem: it concerns -cycles in graphs missing edges, and no problem the corpus records asks about them.