Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Erdos 1969 uber die graphen enthaltenen saturierten planaren

../

conjecture_p17: Erdős's 1969 construction of a graph with [n^2/4]+[(n-1)/2] edges containing no saturated planar graph on more than three vertices, and his conjecture that every graph with [n^2/4]+[(n+1)/2] edges contains one; the origin of the question restated in his 1971 problem list.

lemma_1: The lemma, cited by Erdős in 1969 from his 1962 Rademacher-Turán paper, that every graph on n vertices with [n^2/4]+1 edges has an edge whose ends have more than c_2 n common neighbours, with c_2 an unspecified absolute positive constant.

satz_1: Erdős's 1969 theorem that exceeding the Turán number for triangles by f(n) edges forces a saturated (maximal) planar subgraph on more than c_1 f(n)/n vertices, sharp apart from the constant; his partial answer to a question of Dirac.

satz_2: Erdős's 1969 theorem that every graph on n vertices with [n^2/4]+f(n) edges contains a k-fold pyramid over a circuit with more than c_k' f(n)/n vertices, sharp apart from the value of c_k'; the stronger result from which his Satz 1 follows.

satz_3: Erdős's 1969 theorem that for every ε > 0 there is δ(ε) such that every graph on n vertices with n^2/4 (1+ε) edges contains a saturated planar graph on m vertices for every m < δn with m different from 4, 5 and 7, with only a sketch of the proof.

satz_4: Erdős's 1969 theorem, announced without proof, that for every k and n > n_0(k) every graph on n vertices with [n^2/4 + n(1+ε)] edges contains a k-fold pyramid over a circuit of some length, with his remark that perhaps [n^2/4]+f(k) edges already suffice.

satz_5: Erdős's 1969 theorem, stated without proof, that for every ε > 0 and m there is δ(ε, m) such that every graph on n vertices with n^2/4 (1+ε) edges contains a circuit on m vertices together with [δn] further vertices each joined to the whole circuit.


P. Erdős: Über die in Graphen enthaltenen saturierten planaren Graphen (in German), Math. Nachr. 40 (1969), 13--17 MR 42 #5851; Zentralblatt 194,254.

Partly answering a question of Dirac, this German-language paper shows that exceeding the Turán threshold for triangles by f(n) edges forces not just a triangle but a saturated (maximal) planar subgraph that is large once f(n) is large compared with n. Satz 1 (page 13) states that for any positive function f(n), every graph on n vertices with [n^2/4] + f(n) edges contains a saturated planar subgraph on more than c_1 f(n)/n vertices, and that this bound is sharp apart from the constant; the statement is non-trivial only once f(n) is at least n/c_1. The proof goes through the stronger Satz 2 (page 14), that such a graph contains a k-fold pyramid C_m^{(k)} over a circuit with m > c_k' f(n)/n vertices, using Lemma 1 (page 14, from earlier work) that a graph with [n^2/4] + 1 edges has an edge lying in triangles with more than c_2 n further vertices. Counting k-tuples (inequality (1), page 14) inside the triangle-neighborhoods S(e_i) of f(n) edges e_i with |S(e_i)| > c_2 n, which Lemma 1 supplies, yields one k-tuple common to many of them, and the corresponding edges form a subgraph to which an Erdős-Gallai circuit theorem supplies a circuit on more than 2u/n vertices; that circuit together with the k-tuple is the required pyramid. A matching construction on pages 14--16, a complete bipartite graph with extra edges among one side, shows Satz 2 is sharp up to the constant. The paper is the source for problem 1019 on how many edges force a saturated planar subgraph on more than three vertices.

Source: https://users.renyi.hu/~p_erdos/1969-16.pdf. The site's reference key Er69c.

The copy read for this card is the Rényi archive's scan 1969-16.pdf: five pages, an image scan of the journal article with the printed pages 13--17 (printed p. nn is PDF p. n−12n-12), in German, with the dedication "Herrn Herbert Grötzsch zum 65. Geburtstag am 21. Mai 1967 gewidmet" and "(Eingegangen am 19. 4. 1967)" on p. 13 and the running foot "Math. Nachr. 1969, Bd. 40, H. 1--3" on p. 17. The scan was read on the page images. No notice is printed in the file; the publisher's page could not be read on 2026-10-02 (the publisher's site returned HTTP 403), and the Crossref record for DOI 10.1002/mana.19690400103 (read 2026-10-02) lists only the publisher's terms-and-conditions entry (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor) and no open license, every other right reserved.

Read status: claims checked for Satz 1 (p. 13), Satz 2 and Lemma 1 (p. 14), and the example and conjecture on pp. 16--17, read clause by clause on the page images on 2026-09-18; the proof of Satz 2 (p. 14) and the sharpness construction (pp. 14--16) were read for structure only. Satz 3, Satz 4 and Satz 5 (pp. 16--17) were read as statements, and on 2026-10-08 clause by clause on the page images, with the remarks after each; Satz 4 and Satz 5 have no proof in the paper, and the sketch for Satz 3 was read for structure only. The digest paragraph above agrees with the print for Satz 1, Satz 2, Lemma 1 and the sharpness construction; it omits pp. 16--17, which state the exact question of the catalog's Problem 1019: the paper constructs a G(n;[n2/4]+[(n−1)/2])G(n;[n^2/4]+[(n-1)/2]) with no saturated planar subgraph on more than three vertices and asks whether every G(n;[n2/4]+[(n+1)/2])G(n;[n^2/4]+[(n+1)/2]) contains one, two years before the 1971 problem list restated the question.

Contents

  • P. 13: notation (G(n;l)G(n;l); a planar graph with nn vertices has at most 3n−63n-6 edges, and a planar G(n;3n−6)G(n;3n-6) "gibt immer eine Triangulation der Ebene"; the word "saturiert" is used for such graphs without a definition, a triangle being the saturated planar graph on three vertices); Dirac's question; Satz 1 with the remark that it is non-trivial only when f(n)≥n/c1f(n)\ge n/c_1.
  • P. 14: the pyramids Cm(k)C_m^{(k)} (Cm(2)C_m^{(2)} is a saturated planar graph with m+2m+2 vertices) and the notation PmP_m; Satz 2 (every G(n;[n2/4]+f(n))G(n;[n^2/4]+f(n)) contains a Cm(k)C_m^{(k)} with m>ck′f(n)/nm>c_k'f(n)/n, sharp apart from the value of ck′c_k'); Lemma 1 (every G(n;[n2/4]+1)G(n;[n^2/4]+1) has an edge (x1,x2)(x_1,x_2) and m>c2nm>c_2n further vertices y1,…,ymy_1,\dots,y_m each joined to both x1x_1 and x2x_2), "bekannt [1]" (the 1962 Rademacher--Turán paper, Lemma 2, p. 124); the proof of Satz 2 with display (1); the start of the sharpness construction.
  • Pp. 15--16: the sharpness construction completed (Gallai's argument that a PmP_m contains no two yy's from different index intervals; Euler's formula), ending "also ist Satz 1 scharf".
  • P. 16: Satz 3 ("Zu jedem ε>0\varepsilon>0 existiert ein δ=δ(ε)\delta=\delta(\varepsilon) so, daß jeder G(n;n24(1+ε))G(n;\tfrac{n^2}4(1+\varepsilon)) für jedes m<δnm<\delta n m≠4m\ne4, m≠5m\ne5 und m≠7m\ne7 ein PmP_m enthält"), with remarks on its proof and on the absence of three-chromatic P4P_4, P5P_5, P7P_7; Satz 4 ("Für jedes kk und n>n0(k)n>n_0(k) enthält jeder G(n;[n24+n(1+ε)])G(n;[\tfrac{n^2}4+n(1+\varepsilon)]) für irgendein mm ein Cm(k)C_m^{(k)}", as printed, its proof deferred to another occasion, with "Vielleicht gilt Satz 4 schon für alle G(n;[n24]+f(k))G(n;[\tfrac{n^2}4]+f(k))").
  • Pp. 16--17: the example G(n;[n24]+[n−12])G(n;[\tfrac{n^2}4]+[\tfrac{n-1}2]) with no PmP_m, m>3m>3, and the conjecture for [n24]+[n+12][\tfrac{n^2}4]+[\tfrac{n+1}2] edges, paged at conjecture_p17.
  • P. 17: Satz 5 (for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 and mm there is δ=δ(ε,m)\delta=\delta(\varepsilon,m) such that every G(n;n24(1+ε))G(n;\tfrac{n^2}4(1+\varepsilon)) contains a Cm[δn]C_m^{[\delta n]}), stated without proof, sharp in the sense that δ(ε,m)→0\delta(\varepsilon,m)\to0 as m→∞m\to\infty for every ε<14\varepsilon<\tfrac14, provable "mit den Methoden von [5]" ([5] is Erdős, On extremal problems of graphs and generalized graphs, Israel J. Math. 2 (1964), 183--190, the site's key Er64f; the paper's reference list spells the title with an s); the reference list [1]--[7].

Compiled scope

All five pages were read on the page images; the statements of Satz 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Lemma 1 and the pp. 16--17 passage were read clause by clause, and the proofs were read for structure only. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #1019: the site's key Er69c. Satz 1 (p. 13, page image) is the site's "every graph with nn vertices and ⌊n2/4⌋+k\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+k edges contains a saturated planar graph on ≫k/n\gg k/n vertices, answering a question of Dirac", the paper's partial result, whose unspecified c1c_1 does not settle the problem's threshold; pp. 16--17 (page images) construct the site's example with ⌊n2/4⌋+⌊n−12⌋\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+\lfloor\frac{n-1}2\rfloor edges and state the site's question for ⌊n2/4⌋+⌊n+12⌋\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor+\lfloor\frac{n+1}2\rfloor edges as a "Vielleicht", the origin of the problem, restated in the 1971 list's item 13 (item_13). Satz 2 (p. 14) is the route to Satz 1 and likewise leaves its constant ck′c_k' unspecified; Satz 3, Satz 4 and Satz 5 (pp. 16--17) need an excess over [n2/4][n^2/4] of order nn or more, Satz 4 and Satz 5 being stated without proof, so none of them decides the problem's threshold.

Bears on (Lemma 1). #905: Lemma 1 (p. 14), cited from the 1962 Rademacher--Turán paper, gives an edge on more than c2nc_2n triangles in every graph with nn vertices and [n2/4]+1[n^2/4]+1 edges, c2c_2 unspecified; the problem asks for an edge on at least n/6n/6 triangles once the edges exceed n2/4n^2/4, which the lemma does not give.

Results.

  • Satz 1 (p. 13): for any positive function f(n)f(n), every graph on nn vertices with [n2/4]+f(n)[n^2/4]+f(n) edges contains a saturated planar subgraph on more than c1f(n)/nc_1f(n)/n vertices, sharp apart from the value of c1c_1.
  • Satz 2 (p. 14): every graph on nn vertices with [n2/4]+f(n)[n^2/4]+f(n) edges contains a kk-fold pyramid Cm(k)C_m^{(k)} over a circuit with m>ck′f(n)/nm>c_k'f(n)/n, sharp apart from the value of ck′c_k'; the sharpness construction (pp. 14--16), a near-balanced complete bipartite graph on [n/2][n/2] and [(n+1)/2][(n+1)/2] vertices with extra edges inside one class, is described on that page.
  • Lemma 1 (p. 14): every graph on nn vertices with [n2/4]+1[n^2/4]+1 edges has an edge ee whose triangle-neighbourhood S(e)S(e) has more than c2nc_2n vertices; the paper applies it to obtain, in a graph with [n2/4]+f(n)[n^2/4]+f(n) edges, at least f(n)f(n) such edges.
  • Satz 3 (p. 16): every G(n;n24(1+ε))G(n;\tfrac{n^2}4(1+\varepsilon)) contains a PmP_m for every m<δ(ε)nm<\delta(\varepsilon)n other than 44, 55 and 77; the proof is sketched.
  • Satz 4 (p. 16): for every kk and n>n0(k)n>n_0(k), every G(n;[n24+n(1+ε)])G(n;[\tfrac{n^2}4+n(1+\varepsilon)]) contains a Cm(k)C_m^{(k)} for some mm; stated without proof.
  • Satz 5 (p. 17): every G(n;n24(1+ε))G(n;\tfrac{n^2}4(1+\varepsilon)) contains a Cm[δn]C_m^{[\delta n]}, with δ=δ(ε,m)\delta=\delta(\varepsilon,m); stated without proof.
  • Example and conjecture (pp. 16--17): the graph on x1,…,x[(n+1)/2]x_1,\dots,x_{[(n+1)/2]} and y1,…,y[n/2]y_1,\dots,y_{[n/2]} with all edges xiyjx_iy_j and x1x_1 joined to every xix_i has [n2/4]+[(n−1)/2][n^2/4]+[(n-1)/2] edges and no saturated planar subgraph on more than three vertices; "Vielleicht aber enthält jeder G(n;[n24]+[n+12])G(n;[\tfrac{n^2}4]+[\tfrac{n+1}2]) ein PmP_m mit m>3m>3" (Problem 1019).

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.