Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Erdos 1997 size largest bipartite subgraphs
corollary_3: Shows that every connected graph contains a forest of induced stars covering all of its vertices except at most one.
lemma_1: Shows that edges captured inside bipartite blocks contribute fully while half of all remaining edges can also be retained.
proposition_5: Balances a maximum-matching block partition against one obtained from a one-factorization to prove the exact universal max-cut lower bound.
theorem_4: Bounds the largest bipartite subgraph below by half of the size plus one sixth of the order without isolated vertices, and plus a quarter of one less than the order for connected graphs.
Paul Erdős, András Gyárfás, and Yoshiharu Kohayakawa, “The size of the largest bipartite subgraphs,” Discrete Mathematics 177 (1997), 267-271.
The paper gives a constructive alternative to Edwards's original proof. It partitions a multigraph into an independent block and induced bipartite blocks arising from a maximum matching. Lemma 1 converts the total number of edges inside those blocks into a cut surplus. Proposition 5 chooses two partitions: a maximum-matching one maximizing the internal edge count, and a second, with two-vertex blocks, obtained from a one-factorization. Balancing their two lower bounds yields the exact Edwards formula.
The introduction (p. 268) records that the formula gives exactly when , that is the first case where it is not tight ( against the formula's ), and that the resulting question, whether the surplus of over the formula is bounded, has been answered by Alon: for even and the surplus is at least for an absolute constant , while a construction of his bounds it above by for every positive . Theorem 4 (p. 270) also gives, by the same partition method, the bound for graphs of order without isolated vertices and the connected-graph bound , the second of which the paper credits to Edwards (Theorem 6 of his 1973 paper). The connected-graph bound rests on Lemma 2 (p. 269), which for connected chooses the matching partition with at most one vertex outside its blocks; the paper deduces from it Corollary 3 (p. 270), a forest of induced stars covering all vertices but at most one.
The copy read for this card is the final published five-page scan hosted on András Gyárfás's publication site at https://www.renyi.hu/~gyarfas/Cikkek/81_largebip.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-365X(97)00004-6. The file prints "Copyright © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved" on its first page, every other right reserved.
Results.
- Lemma 1 (p. 268): block partitions produce a cut with at least edges.
- [[extremal_graph_theory/erdos_1997_size_largest_bipartite_subgraphs/corollary_3|Corollary 3]] (p. 270), with Lemma 2 (p. 269): connected graphs have a forest of induced stars covering all vertices but at most one.
- [[extremal_graph_theory/erdos_1997_size_largest_bipartite_subgraphs/theorem_4|Theorem 4]] (p. 270): lower bounds in terms of size and order.
- [[extremal_graph_theory/erdos_1997_size_largest_bipartite_subgraphs/proposition_5|Proposition 5]] (p. 271): the min-max lower bound from which the paper deduces the Edwards formula.
Bears on.
- #127: Proposition 5, with Lemma 1, gives a constructive proof of the Edwards lower bound, the baseline over which the problem measures its correction. The paper does not itself address whether the correction is unbounded; it reports Alon's answer.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.