Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Furedi 2006 turan number hexagon
theorem_1_1: Gives an infinite family of hexagon-free graphs above the one-half leading constant and a universal upper bound with coefficient lambda.
theorem_1_2: Bounds the edges of hexagon-free bipartite graphs with prescribed part sizes and gives an asymptotically sharp construction at part ratio two.
theorem_1_3: Every hexagon-free graph has a subgraph of girth at least five with at least half its edges, and half is the best possible exactly for edge-disjoint unions of complete graphs on four or five vertices.
Zoltan Füredi, Assaf Naor, and Jacques Verstraëte, On the Turán Number for the Hexagon. Advances in Mathematics 203(2) (2006), 476--496, DOI 10.1016/j.aim.2005.04.011. The Princeton publication record and Naor's publication list identify the published article.
Edition read
The copy read for this card is the author's 20-page manuscript with printed pages 1--20, not the 21-page journal layout. It has no printed revision date; its PDF metadata records 21 April 2005. The author-hosted manuscript link is a source location. Only that manuscript was used for mathematical reading; neither a fresh download nor a line-by-line comparison with the published version was made. Result labels and locators below refer to that manuscript, not journal pages 476--496. That manuscript is the one at the author-hosted address https://web.math.princeton.edu/~naor/homepage%20files/final-hexagons.pdf, not the publisher's article; no copyright or license line is printed on any of its pages, and no record stating terms for it was read; the term is unstated.
Results and relation to Problem 574
Theorem 1.1, on p. 2, concerns a single forbidden . For infinitely many orders , it gives hexagon-free graphs with at least
edges for sufficiently large orders in that sequence. It also states the all-order upper bound , where , and hence an upper bound for sufficiently large . The lower bound refutes the single-cycle conjecture at . The source's discussion of earlier quadrilateral and results is historical; those proofs have not been checked here.
The direct interface to Problem 574 is instead Theorem 1.2, also on p. 2. It gives for every pair of positive part sizes. When , the value is for infinitely many , and as through all positive integers. Section 2's bipartite construction on p. 3 has total order , avoids as well as , and yields leading coefficient . The resulting disproof of the catalog's formula is a deduction by this compilation. Theorem 1.1's nonbipartite construction does not assert -freeness, so its larger coefficient is not the lower bound used for the two-cycle catalog question.
Theorem 1.3, also on p. 2, is the paper's third main result: every hexagon-free graph has a subgraph of girth at least five containing at least half its edges, with equality exactly when the graph is a union of edge-disjoint complete graphs of order four or five. Its proof, in Section 3.1, pp. 6--7, is located but not audited. It bears on no Erdős problem in the corpus.
Reading and proof coverage
Complete rendered pp. 1--8, 12--13, and 17--20 were inspected for identity, definitions, statements, the two distinct constructions, proof locations, and the concluding limitations. Reading depth is claims checked, with the construction descriptions read. The all-order interpolation paragraph on p. 3 prints an error , with , which is not lower order than its main term. This apparent printed inconsistency is recorded on the Theorem 1.2 page without repair; the infinite-sequence exact construction used for E0574 does not rely on that interpolation.
The upper proofs and their dependencies were not audited or reconstructed. Section 7, p. 13, contains apparent printed mismatches in its cubic calculation, recorded on the Theorem 1.2 page. No local repair or published-version comparison is claimed. These issues lie in the upper proof, outside the lower construction used for E0574.
The source uses incidence geometries for the constructions and path-counting and matrix inequalities for the upper bounds. No complete source-proof reconstruction, independent proof review, numerical experiment, or Lean verification is recorded here. Theorem 1.1's subsequential lower bound does not determine a limiting constant; the source explicitly discusses this distinction on p. 18. The bounds are attributed to this source, without an unqualified claim that they are the latest bounds.
Bears on. #574: the bipartite construction of Section 2 (p. 3), which gives the lower bound of Theorem 1.2, has parts of sizes and , where for a prime power , and edges, with no and, being bipartite, no ; along the orders this exceeds the problem's proposed by a constant factor, so it contradicts the case. The paper itself states no result about ; the comparison is the corpus's deduction. Theorem 1.1 concerns alone and is context only.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.