Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Mader 1973 ein extremalproblem des zusammenhangs von graphen

../

examples_p228: Mader's 1973 examples showing that no constant c_n makes (n/2)e(G) + c_n edges force two vertices joined by n internally disjoint paths, for odd n ≥ 5 and even n ≥ 6: from an (n − 2)-regular graph with m cut cliques and a universal vertex, graphs with (n/2)(e − 1) + m(n/2 − 2), or m(n − 5), edges and no two vertices joined by n such paths; the disproof of the vertex-disjoint form of the Bollobás–Erdős conjecture the site records as k_m(n) > (m/2)n + C.

korollar: Mader's exact edge-disjoint threshold: every graph with more than (n/2)(e(G) − 1) edges has two vertices joined by n edge-disjoint paths, and for every m ≥ n ≥ 2 there is a graph on m vertices with [(n/2)(m − 1)] edges and no such pair; in the site's notation ℓ_m(n) = [(m/2)(n − 1)] + 1, which is 1 + n·C(m,2) at the problem's parameters.

satz_1: Mader's theorem that every finite graph G on at least n vertices with more than (n/2)(e(G) − 1) − (1/2)σ_n(G) edges, σ_n(G) the sum over vertices of degree below n − 1 of their degree deficits, contains two vertices joined by n edge-disjoint paths; the edge-disjoint form of the Bollobás–Erdős conjecture for every n.

satz_2: Mader's girth-restricted vertex-disjoint bound: for n ≥ 4, every finite graph G of girth at least n + 2 with at least n + 1 vertices and more than (n/2)(e(G) − (n − 1)) edges contains two vertices joined by n paths that pairwise share only their ends.


W. Mader, Ein Extremalproblem des Zusammenhangs von Graphen, Math. Z. 131 (1973), 223--231 (the header of p. 223 prints "Math. Z. 131, 223--231 (1973)" and "© by Springer-Verlag 1973"; the DOI 10.1007/BF01187240 and the issue number 3 are not printed and come from the Crossref record cited on the problem page); "Eingegangen am 14. November 1972" (received 14 November 1972, p. 231); the author at the "II. Mathematisches Institut der FU", D-1000 Berlin 33, as printed on p. 231 (page image and text layer; FU is the Freie Universität). Cited as [Ma73] on the problem page. The copy read for this card is the publisher's version of record; no preprint or repository version is known here. Its seven references (p. 231) are [1] Bollobás, On graphs with at most three independent paths connecting any two vertices, Studia Sci. Math. Hungar. 1 (1966), 137--140, the problem page's [Bo66] (not held); [2] Erdős and Sachs, Reguläre Graphen gegebener Taillenweite mit minimaler Knotenzahl, Wiss. Z. Martin-Luther-Univ. Halle-Wittenberg, math.-naturw. R. 12 (1963), 251--258; [3] Harary, Graph Theory (Addison-Wesley, 1969); [4] Leonard, On graphs with at most four line-disjoint paths connecting any two vertices, J. Combinat. Theory Ser. B 13 (1972), 242--250, filed as leonard_1972_graphs_at_most_four_line_disjoint_paths_connecting_any_two_vertices; [5] Mader, Existenz gewisser Konfigurationen in nn-gesättigten Graphen und in Graphen genügend großer Kantendichte, Math. Ann. 194 (1971), 295--312; [6] Mader, Kantendisjunkte Wege in Graphen, "Eingereicht bei den Monatsh. Math." (submitted); and [7] Wagner, Graphentheorie (Bibliographisches Institut, 1970). The paper is reference [9] of the filed sorensen_thomassen_1974_k_rails_graphs, which reports both of its results for the problem on p. 143, and the value of its Korollar is the formula that the filed Leonard 1972 proves for r≤5r\le5 and leaves open for r>5r>5 on p. 250; the filed leonard_1973_graphs_ways is the n=6n=6 proof that footnote 1 of p. 223 reports from an oral communication.

The copy read for this card is the publisher's per-article PDF, a scan of the printed article: 9 pages, printed pp. 223--231 = PDF pp. 1--9 (printed p. nn is PDF p. n−222n-222), generated from a TIFF scan in January 2005 per the file's metadata (creator "304232005.TIF", producer PageGenie PDFGenerator), with an OCR text layer that locates passages but garbles the umlauts, the Greek letters of the notation (κ\kappa, λ\lambda, γ\gamma, σ\sigma and μ\mu come out as Latin letters and digits), the inequality signs, the subscripts and every displayed formula. Provenance: the copy was obtained from the publisher on 2026-09-22 as a DRM-free PDF, the DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01187240 resolving to the article; 403,224 bytes. The file prints "© by Springer-Verlag 1973" on its first page (the OCR text layer renders the symbol as "9"), every other right reserved.

Read status: claims checked for the introduction with its footnote 1, the notation and Satz 1 (p. 223), the identities (1) and (2) (p. 224), the Korollar with its proof (pp. 226--227), the definition of type nn (p. 227), the passage on the vertex-disjoint problem with its examples and their edge counts (pp. 228--229), Satz 2 with (X) and footnotes 3 and 4 (p. 229) and the closing remarks (p. 231), each read clause by clause on the page images of PDF pp. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 on 2026-09-22; p. 231 was read on the page image for the reference list, the address and the received date. The proof of Satz 1 (pp. 223--226) was read on the page images of PDF pp. 1--4 for structure (the induction on the number of vertices, the separating edge set TT, the graphs Gˉν\bar G_\nu and Gν′G'_\nu, the assertion (A) and the cases I--III); the structural results (Z) and (Y) with their proofs (pp. 227--228) and the proofs of (X) and of Satz 2 (pp. 230--231) were read on the page images for structure only. None of the steps was checked. The edge counts of the examples of p. 229 were recomputed here (below). Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Contents

  • Introduction and notation (p. 223, page image). The paper opens with its question: how many edges a graph with a given number of vertices can have without containing two vertices joined by nn edge-disjoint paths ("kantendisjunkte Wege"). Conventions, quoted: "Sei e(G)e(G) die Anzahl der Ecken, κ(G)\kappa(G) die Anzahl der Kanten des endlichen, ungerichteten, schlingenlosen Graphen GG ohne mehrfache Kanten" (e(G)e(G) the number of vertices, Ecken, and κ(G)\kappa(G) the number of edges, Kanten, of a finite undirected loopless graph without multiple edges). The announcement, quoted: "Es wird bewiesen, daß in jedem Graphen GG mit κ(G)>n2(e(G)−1)\kappa(G)>\frac n2(e(G)-1) zwei Ecken existieren, die durch nn kantendisjunkte Wege verbunden sind, und diese Abschätzung ist bestmöglich" (it is proved that in every graph GG with κ(G)>n2(e(G)−1)\kappa(G)>\frac n2(e(G)-1) two vertices exist that are joined by nn edge-disjoint paths, and this estimate is best possible). The next sentence attributes the case n=4n=4 to [1] and the case n=5n=5 to [4], and footnote 1 adds that, by an oral communication of Bollobás, Leonard has proved the inequality for n=6n=6 as well. The paper also derives properties of the extremal graphs and closes with the analogous question for vertex-disjoint paths ("eckendisjunkte Wege"). Notation: E(G)E(G) and K(G)K(G) the vertex and edge sets; [x,y]=[y,x][x,y]=[y,x] the edge between xx and yy; λ(x,y;G)\lambda(x,y;G) the maximum number of edge-disjoint paths between x≠yx\ne y in GG; γ(x,G)\gamma(x,G) the degree of xx; and, displayed, λˉ(G):=max⁡x≠yλ(x,y;G)\bar\lambda(G):=\max_{x\ne y}\lambda(x,y;G), Em(G):={x∈E(G)∣γ(x,G)≤m}E_m(G):=\{x\in E(G)\mid\gamma(x,G)\le m\}, em(G):=∣Em(G)∣e_m(G):=|E_m(G)| and $\sigma_n(G):=e_0(G)+e_1(G)+\cdots+e_{n-2}(G) =\sum_{x\in E_{n-1}(G)}(n-1-\gamma(x,G))$, nn a natural number. A filing note: a vertex of degree d≤n−1d\le n-1 is counted by ed,…,en−2e_d,\ldots,e_{n-2}, that is n−1−dn-1-d times, so the two forms of σn\sigma_n agree; em(G)e_m(G) counts vertices of degree at most mm, as the site's thread reads it, not of degree exactly mm.
  • Satz 1 and its proof (pp. 223--226; the statement on the page image of PDF p. 1, the proof on the page images of PDF pp. 1--4 for structure), paged at satz_1. Quoted: "Satz 1. Jeder endliche Graph GG mit κ(G)>n2(e(G)−1)−12σn(G)\kappa(G)>\frac n2(e(G)-1)-\frac12\sigma_n(G) und e(G)≥ne(G)\ge n enthält zwei Ecken xx und yy mit λ(x,y;G)≥n\lambda(x,y;G)\ge n." The proof first counts edges by degrees: if En−1(G)=E(G)E_{n-1}(G)=E(G) then (1) κ(G)=n−12e(G)−12σn(G)\kappa(G)=\frac{n-1}2e(G)-\frac12\sigma_n(G), and if exactly one vertex has degree at least nn then (2) κ(G)≤n2(e(G)−1)−12σn(G)\kappa(G)\le\frac n2(e(G)-1)-\frac12\sigma_n(G) (p. 224). Then induction on the number of vertices, supposing λˉ(G)<n\bar\lambda(G)<n: since n−12e(G)≤n2(e(G)−1)\frac{n-1}2e(G)\le\frac n2(e(G)-1) for e(G)≥ne(G)\ge n, (1) and (2) give two vertices a1a_1, a2a_2 of degree at least nn; Menger's theorem (cited to Wagner [7], Satz 9.3) gives a set TT of edges separating them with ∣T∣=λ(a1,a2;G)<n|T|=\lambda(a_1,a_2;G)<n, G−TG-T the disjoint union of G1∋a1G_1\ni a_1 and G2∋a2G_2\ni a_2, and CνC_\nu the set of endpoints of TT in GνG_\nu. The induction hypothesis applied to Gˉν:=(E(G)−Rν,K(G)−K(Gν))\bar G_\nu:=(E(G)-R_\nu,K(G)-K(G_\nu)) gives (3) ∣C1∣+∣C2∣>n|C_1|+|C_2|>n (pp. 224--225). For the graphs Gν′G'_\nu obtained from GG by identifying the vertices outside GνG_\nu to one vertex AνA_\nu, the assertion (A) λ(x,y;Gν′)≤λ(x,y;G)\lambda(x,y;G'_\nu)\le\lambda(x,y;G) for x,y∈E(Gν)x,y\in E(G_\nu) is proved by rerouting a path through AνA_\nu along two of the a1a_1--a2a_2 paths, so λˉ(Gν′)<n\bar\lambda(G'_\nu)<n (p. 225); and the induction hypothesis, or (1) for a Gν′G'_\nu with e(Gν′)≤ne(G'_\nu)\le n, applied to G1′G'_1, G2′G'_2 in three cases (I, e(G1′)≥ne(G'_1)\ge n and e(G2′)≥ne(G'_2)\ge n; II, e(G1′)≤ne(G'_1)\le n and e(G2′)≥ne(G'_2)\ge n; III, e(G1′)≤ne(G'_1)\le n and e(G2′)≤ne(G'_2)\le n) gives (4) ∣C1∣+∣C2∣<n|C_1|+|C_2|<n through the displayed inequalities (β\beta), (γ\gamma), (δ\delta), the identity (β′\beta') from (1) and the sharpenings (γ′\gamma'), (γ′′\gamma'') of (γ\gamma), against (3) (pp. 225--226). Footnote 2 (p. 225) defines W[a,b]W[a,b] as the subpath of a path WW between aa and bb.
  • Korollar and its proof (pp. 226--227, page images), paged at korollar. Quoted: "Korollar. Für jeden Graphen GG mit κ(G)>n2(e(G)−1)\kappa(G)>\frac n2(e(G)-1) gilt λˉ(G)≥n\bar\lambda(G)\ge n. Zu jeder ganzen Zahl m≥n≥2m\ge n\ge2 existiert ein Graph GG mit e(G)=me(G)=m, κ(G)=[n2(e(G)−1)]\kappa(G)=\bigl[\frac n2(e(G)-1)\bigr] und λˉ(G)<n\bar\lambda(G)<n." Proof: e(G)>ne(G)>n follows from the edge count, so the first claim is Satz 1; for the second, when mm is odd or nn even there is (by the Erdős--Gallai criterion, Harary [3], Satz 6.2, or by factorizations of complete graphs) a graph on mm vertices with one vertex of degree m−1m-1 and all others of degree n−1n-1, and when mm is even and nn odd one with one vertex of degree m−1m-1, one of degree n−2n-2 and all others of degree n−1n-1; it has [n2(e(G)−1)]\bigl[\frac n2(e(G)-1)\bigr] edges "und es ist offensichtlich λˉ(G)<n\bar\lambda(G)<n" (and obviously λˉ(G)<n\bar\lambda(G)<n).
  • The extremal graphs (pp. 227--228; the definition on the page image, the rest for structure). A graph with one vertex of degree e(G)−1e(G)-1 and all others of degree less than nn is "vom Typ nn" (of type nn). The paper contrasts the cases: by [1], for n=4n=4 every 2-connected graph GG with κ(G)=n2(e(G)−1)\kappa(G)=\frac n2(e(G)-1) and λˉ(G)<n\bar\lambda(G)<n is of type nn, whereas for every n≥5n\ge5 there are, the paper says, easily given 2-connected extremal graphs with arbitrarily many vertices that are not of type nn (no construction is printed). For GG with e(G)>n≥2e(G)>n\ge2, κ(G)=n2(e(G)−1)−12σn(G)\kappa(G)=\frac n2(e(G)-1)-\frac12\sigma_n(G) and λˉ(G)<n\bar\lambda(G)<n and two vertices of degree at least nn: ∣C1∣+∣C2∣=n|C_1|+|C_2|=n, ∣T∣=n−1|T|=n-1 and equality in (δ\delta), (β\beta) and (γ\gamma) (or (γ′\gamma'), (γ′′\gamma'')); (Z) at most one vertex of C1C_1, and of C2C_2, is incident with two or more edges of TT; the graph H:=(C1∪C2,T)H:=(C_1\cup C_2,T) is a tree with at least e(H)−2e(H)-2 leaves; and (Y) there are y1∈C1y_1\in C_1, y2∈C2y_2\in C_2 with [y1,y2]∈T[y_1,y_2]\in T such that every edge of TT is incident with y1y_1 or y2y_2, so GG splits "längs [y1,y2][y_1,y_2]" (along that edge) into two extremal graphs G1′G'_1, G2′G'_2. For 2-connected GG, by Satz 1 of [6] the set TT can be chosen so that one component has exactly one vertex of degree at least nn, which is y1y_1, and G1′G'_1 is of type nn. Remarks (p. 228): with the hypothesis weakened to degree at least n−1n-1 the same holds for TT, so GG is (n−1)(n-1)-edge-connected when σn(G)=0\sigma_n(G)=0; and in a graph GG with κ(G)=n2(e(G)−1)−12\kappa(G)=\frac n2(e(G)-1)-\frac12, σn(G)=0\sigma_n(G)=0 and λˉ(G)<n\bar\lambda(G)<n a smallest edge set separating two vertices of degree at least nn need not have the form (Y), and ∣T∣=n−2|T|=n-2 can occur.
  • The vertex-disjoint problem (pp. 228--229, page images), paged at examples_p228. Notation: μ(a,b;G)\mu(a,b;G) the maximum number of paths between a≠ba\ne b that pairwise share only aa and bb, μˉ(G)=max⁡a≠bμ(a,b;G)\bar\mu(G)=\max_{a\ne b}\mu(a,b;G), and τ(G)\tau(G) the girth ("Taille"). The question: how many edges a graph with e(G)=me(G)=m and μˉ(G)<n\bar\mu(G)<n can have. For n≤4n\le4 the extremal graphs are the same as for edge-disjoint paths, by [1]; for n≥5n\ge5 the paper says the problem seems "keine einfache Lösung zuzulassen" (to admit no simple solution); the related problem of the maximal number of edges without two adjacent vertices aa, bb with μ(a,b;G)≥n\mu(a,b;G)\ge n was solved in [5]. Then, quoted: "Die folgenden Beispiele zeigen, daß keine Konstante cnc_n mit der Eigenschaft existiert, daß für jeden endlichen (2-fach zusammenhängenden) Graphen GG mit κ(G)≥n2e(G)+cn\kappa(G)\ge\frac n2e(G)+c_n gilt μˉ(G)≥n\bar\mu(G)\ge n" (the following examples show that no constant cnc_n exists such that every finite, 2-connected, graph GG with κ(G)≥n2e(G)+cn\kappa(G)\ge\frac n2e(G)+c_n has μˉ(G)≥n\bar\mu(G)\ge n). The construction, for odd n≥5n\ge5 (in parentheses, even n≥6n\ge6): a connected graph G′G', regular of degree n−2n-2, containing mm disjoint complete graphs H1,…,HmH_1,\ldots,H_m with e(Hμ)=n−2e(H_\mu)=n-2 (resp. n−3n-3) such that G′−K(Hμ)G'-K(H_\mu) falls into n−2n-2 (resp. n−3n-3) components for every μ\mu; "Solche Graphen lassen sich ohne Schwierigkeit angeben" (such graphs can be given without difficulty), with footnote 3 that for even nn no graphs of the first kind exist and for odd n≥7n\ge7 the second construction also works. GG is G′G' with a new vertex AA joined to every vertex of G′G'; then κ(G)=n2(e(G)−1)\kappa(G)=\frac n2(e(G)-1) and μ(a,b;G)=n−2\mu(a,b;G)=n-2 (resp. n−3n-3) for a≠ba\ne b in E(Hν)E(H_\nu). Gˉ\bar G adds, for odd nn, a new vertex xμx_\mu joined to every vertex of HμH_\mu for each μ\mu, and for even nn two new vertices xμ1x^1_\mu, xμ2x^2_\mu each joined to every vertex of HμH_\mu and to each other. Quoted: "Dann ist auch noch μˉ(Gˉ)<n\bar\mu(\bar G)<n und es gilt κ(Gˉ)=n2(e(Gˉ)−1)+m(n2−2)\kappa(\bar G)=\frac n2(e(\bar G)-1)+m(\frac n2-2) (bzw. κ(Gˉ)=n2(e(Gˉ)−1)+m(n−5)\kappa(\bar G)=\frac n2(e(\bar G)-1)+m(n-5))." Edge counts recomputed here: κ(G)=n−22e(G′)+e(G′)=n2(e(G)−1)\kappa(G)=\frac{n-2}2e(G')+e(G')=\frac n2(e(G)-1); for odd nn, e(Gˉ)=e(G)+me(\bar G)=e(G)+m and $\kappa(\bar G)=\kappa(G)+m(n-2) =\frac n2(e(\bar G)-1)-\frac{mn}2+m(n-2)=\frac n2(e(\bar G)-1)+m(\frac n2-2)$; for even nn, e(Gˉ)=e(G)+2me(\bar G)=e(G)+2m and κ(Gˉ)=κ(G)+2m(n−3)+m=n2(e(Gˉ)−1)+m(n−5)\kappa(\bar G)=\kappa(G)+2m(n-3)+m=\frac n2(e(\bar G)-1)+m(n-5), as printed. The absence of nn internally disjoint paths in Gˉ\bar G is asserted, not argued. The passage closes with the remark that if "kleine" (small) cycles are forbidden, in particular the complete graphs VmV_m with m≥3m\ge3, then κ(G)>n2(e(G)−1)\kappa(G)>\frac n2(e(G)-1) does force μˉ(G)≥n\bar\mu(G)\ge n.
  • Satz 2 (pp. 229--231; the statement, (X) and the footnotes on the page image of PDF p. 7, the proofs and the closing remarks on the page images of PDF pp. 8--9), paged at satz_2. Quoted: "Satz 2. Jeder endliche Graph GG der Taille τ(G)≥n+2\tau(G)\ge n+2 mit κ(G)>n2(e(G)−(n−1))\kappa(G)>\frac n2(e(G)-(n-1)) und e(G)≥n+1e(G)\ge n+1 enthält zwei Ecken aa und bb mit μ(a,b;G)≥n\mu(a,b;G)\ge n, falls n≥4n\ge4 ist" (every finite graph of girth at least n+2n+2 with more than n2(e(G)−(n−1))\frac n2(e(G)-(n-1)) edges and at least n+1n+1 vertices contains two vertices joined by nn internally disjoint paths, for n≥4n\ge4), with footnote 4 that by a theorem of Erdős and Sachs [2] graphs satisfying these hypotheses exist. (X): every graph with e(G)≥n+1e(G)\ge n+1, τ(G)≥n+2\tau(G)\ge n+2 and κ(G)>n2(e(G)−(n−1))\kappa(G)>\frac n2(e(G)-(n-1)) contains, for n≥4n\ge4, at least two vertices of degree at least nn; proved (p. 230) by counting edges around a shortest cycle CC and the set NN of vertices adjacent to it, each adjacent to exactly one vertex of CC since τ(G)>4\tau(G)>4. Proof of Satz 2 (pp. 230--231): induction on e(G)e(G); a vertex set TT with ∣T∣=n−1|T|=n-1 whose removal leaves parts G1′G'_1, G2′G'_2 of at least two vertices each gives μˉ(G)≥n\bar\mu(G)\ge n by the induction hypothesis and an edge count; by (X) there are vertices x1≠x2x_1\ne x_2 of degree at least nn, and if μ(x1,x2;G)<n\mu(x_1,x_2;G)<n Menger's theorem supplies such a TT, directly when [x1,x2]∉K(G)[x_1,x_2]\notin K(G) and, when [x1,x2]∈K(G)[x_1,x_2]\in K(G), from a separating set T′T' of G−[x1,x2]G-[x_1,x_2] with ∣T′∣=n−2>0|T'|=n-2>0 enlarged by one of x1x_1, x2x_2, using τ(G)>3\tau(G)>3. Closing remarks (p. 231): Satz 2 also holds for n≤3n\le3, the pentagon being the only exception, for n=3n=3; sharpenings hold, for instance μˉ(G)≥4\bar\mu(G)\ge4 for every graph with κ(G)>2(e(G)−3)\kappa(G)>2(e(G)-3), e(G)≥6e(G)\ge6 and τ(G)≥5\tau(G)\ge5 up to one exception, and μˉ(G)≥8\bar\mu(G)\ge8 for every graph with κ(G)>4(e(G)−7)\kappa(G)>4(e(G)-7), e(G)≥10e(G)\ge10 and τ(G)≥6\tau(G)\ge6; Satz 2 "legt die Vermutung nahe" (suggests the conjecture) that every graph with κ(G)>n2(e(G)−1)\kappa(G)>\frac n2(e(G)-1) and μˉ(G)<n\bar\mu(G)<n must contain triangles, though such a graph need not contain a V4V_4 (a complete graph on four vertices), by identifying two suitable graphs H1H_1, H2H_2 along an edge, for n≥5n\ge5. No argument is printed for the remarks.
  • References (p. 231, page image), the seven items listed above; the address and the received date.

Compiled scope

The paper is compiled at statement depth for the results Problem 915 consumes: Satz 1 (p. 223) with the Korollar (p. 226), the edge-disjoint reading's threshold, and the examples of pp. 228--229, the vertex-disjoint reading's unbounded excess, read on the page images, quoted above and paged at satz_1, korollar and examples_p228. Satz 2 (p. 229), which the problem page lists, is paged at satz_2. The structural results (Z) and (Y) and Satz 2 are recorded as statements read on the page images with their proofs read for structure. A filing observation, not a review verdict: the site and the filed Sørensen--Thomassen paper report the vertex-disjoint bound for m≥6m\ge6 (k>5k>5), while the printed examples are stated "für ungerades n≥5n\ge5 (bzw. gerades n≥6n\ge6)", so the printed range includes n=5n=5, where the excess is m(52−2)=m2m(\frac52-2)=\frac m2. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #915: the site's key Ma73 and the source of both of the page's readings of "disjoint". Under the edge-disjoint reading, Satz 1 (printed p. 223, PDF p. 1), "Jeder endliche Graph GG mit κ(G)>n2(e(G)−1)−12σn(G)\kappa(G)>\frac n2(e(G)-1)-\frac12\sigma_n(G) und e(G)≥ne(G)\ge n enthält zwei Ecken xx und yy mit λ(x,y;G)≥n\lambda(x,y;G)\ge n", is the theorem the site records as "if a graph with nn vertices has >m2(n−1)−12(e0(G)+⋯+em−2(G))>\frac m2(n-1)-\frac12(e_0(G)+\cdots+e_{m-2}(G)) edges then GG contains two vertices connected by mm edge-disjoint paths", and its Korollar (printed p. 226, PDF p. 4), "Für jeden Graphen GG mit κ(G)>n2(e(G)−1)\kappa(G)>\frac n2(e(G)-1) gilt λˉ(G)≥n\bar\lambda(G)\ge n. Zu jeder ganzen Zahl m≥n≥2m\ge n\ge2 existiert ein Graph GG mit e(G)=me(G)=m, κ(G)=[n2(e(G)−1)]\kappa(G)=\bigl[\frac n2(e(G)-1)\bigr] und λˉ(G)<n\bar\lambda(G)<n", is the site's ℓm(n)=⌊m2(n−1)+1⌋\ell_m(n)=\lfloor\frac m2(n-1)+1\rfloor for every m≥2m\ge2; at the problem's parameters, a graph on 1+n(m−1)1+n(m-1) vertices with 1+n(m2)1+n\binom m2 edges has more than m2⋅n(m−1)=n(m2)\frac m2\cdot n(m-1)=n\binom m2 edges and at least mm vertices, so the answer is yes for every m≥2m\ge2 under that reading, and the extremal graphs of the Korollar's proof at e(G)=1+n(m−1)e(G)=1+n(m-1), a universal vertex over an (m−2)(m-2)-regular graph, have exactly n(m2)n\binom m2 edges, one short (an arithmetic check made here). Under the vertex-disjoint reading, the examples of pp. 228--229 (PDF pp. 6--7) show "daß keine Konstante cnc_n mit der Eigenschaft existiert, daß für jeden endlichen (2-fach zusammenhängenden) Graphen GG mit κ(G)≥n2e(G)+cn\kappa(G)\ge\frac n2e(G)+c_n gilt μˉ(G)≥n\bar\mu(G)\ge n", for odd n≥5n\ge5 and even n≥6n\ge6: the site's "for all m≥6m\ge6 and any C>0C>0, there exists an nn such that km(n)>m2n+Ck_m(n)>\frac m2n+C", which the site and Sørensen--Thomassen report as disproving the conjectured km(1+(m−1)n)=1+(m2)nk_m(1+(m-1)n)=1+\binom m2n for every such mm; the paper prints no statement about the conjecture itself under this reading and does not name Bollobás and Erdős. The paper settles nothing the page leaves open: the page's status is the site's label attached to the vertex-disjoint disproof, which is recorded through Sørensen and Thomassen's Theorem 4 and Leonard's counterexample, and this card records the edge-disjoint reading's status-defining theorem first-hand and adds the third first-hand vertex-disjoint disproof. Satz 2 (printed p. 229, PDF p. 7) does not decide the vertex-disjoint reading; it gives the conjectured conclusion only for graphs of girth at least m+2m+2, m≥4m\ge4 (an arithmetic check made on its page). The problem page reads Satz 1, the Korollar and the examples on the page images at statement depth; no proof was checked.

Results.

  • Satz 1 (p. 223): every finite graph GG with e(G)≥ne(G)\ge n and κ(G)>n2(e(G)−1)−12σn(G)\kappa(G)>\frac n2(e(G)-1)-\frac12\sigma_n(G) contains two vertices joined by nn edge-disjoint paths; by induction on the number of vertices through Menger's theorem (pp. 223--226).
  • Korollar (p. 226): more than n2(e(G)−1)\frac n2(e(G)-1) edges force λˉ(G)≥n\bar\lambda(G)\ge n, and for every m≥n≥2m\ge n\ge2 some graph on mm vertices with [n2(m−1)]\bigl[\frac n2(m-1)\bigr] edges has λˉ(G)<n\bar\lambda(G)<n; the exact edge-disjoint threshold.
  • Examples (pp. 228--229): for odd n≥5n\ge5 and even n≥6n\ge6, graphs Gˉ\bar G with κ(Gˉ)=n2(e(Gˉ)−1)+m(n2−2)\kappa(\bar G)=\frac n2(e(\bar G)-1)+m(\frac n2-2), or +m(n−5)+m(n-5), and μˉ(Gˉ)<n\bar\mu(\bar G)<n, so no constant cnc_n makes n2e(G)+cn\frac n2e(G)+c_n edges force two vertices joined by nn internally disjoint paths.
  • Satz 2 (p. 229): for n≥4n\ge4, every finite graph GG with τ(G)≥n+2\tau(G)\ge n+2, e(G)≥n+1e(G)\ge n+1 and κ(G)>n2(e(G)−(n−1))\kappa(G)>\frac n2(e(G)-(n-1)) has μˉ(G)≥n\bar\mu(G)\ge n; through the auxiliary statement (X) and induction with Menger's theorem (pp. 229--231).

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.