Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Mubayi 2024 order erdos rogers functions
equation_1: The known lower bound for the Erdős–Rogers function, deduced in the introduction from Shearer's independent-set bound for K_{s+1}-free graphs of given maximum degree applied to a vertex neighborhood; Shearer's paper is not held and the bound is recorded here second-hand.
theorem_1: The Erdős–Rogers function f_s(n), the largest m such that every n-vertex K_{s+1}-free graph has m vertices spanning no K_s, is at most a constant depending only on s times root n log n for each fixed s at least 3; the proof gives the explicit constant 2 to the 100 s.
Dhruv Mubayi, Jacques Verstraete, On the order of Erdős-Rogers functions. arXiv:2401.02548 (2024); published as "On the order of the classical Erdős–Rogers functions", Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 57 (2025), no. 2, 582--598, doi:10.1112/blms.13214 (published online 20 December 2024; Crossref record read).
Retained artifact. The folder-name PDF is arXiv:2401.02548v2 (8 February 2024; title page dated February 12, 2024), 14 pages with a text layer; v1 is of 4 January 2024. Page numbers here are the preprint's; the journal text is not held and was not compared. The paper spells Wolfovitz's name "Wolfovits" (p. 1). Its definition of f_s(n) says "K_s-free subgraph with m vertices" (p. 1) while the construction of Section 4 (p. 4) is stated for induced subgraphs ("every induced subgraph of H with subtantially more than about sqrt(n) log n vertices contains a copy of K_s"), the reading under which the function is nontrivial and the one Problem 620 uses. The arXiv record (https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02548, read 2026-10-02) names the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
Read status: claims checked for the definition, equation (1) and Theorem 1 with the paragraph giving the constant 2^{100s} (p. 1), Propositions 1-3 (p. 2) and the Section 4 plan (p. 4), read clause by clause on the page images; the proof (Sections 3-5 and the appendix) was not read.
The Erdős-Rogers function f_s(n) is the largest m such that every n-vertex K_{s+1}-free graph contains a K_s-free subgraph on m vertices. Shearer's independence-number bound gives f_s(n) = Omega(sqrt(n log n)/log log n) for all s >= 3, while the earlier upper bounds were f_3(n) = O(sqrt n (log n)^{120}) by Wolfovitz (the paper's [21], Combinatorica 33 (2013), 623--631, on p. 14 of the preprint, text layer; filed as Theorem 1.1, which states f_{3,4}(n) <= n^{1/2} (ln n)^{120} for all large n on printed p. 623, PDF p. 1, read on the page image) and f_3(n) = O(sqrt n (log n)^{32}) and f_s(n) = O(sqrt n (log n)^{2(s+1)^2}) by Dudek, Retter and Rödl. Theorem 1 proves f_s(n) = O(sqrt n log n) for each fixed s >= 3, cutting the polylogarithmic gap to a single logarithm and giving f_s(n) = n^{1/2 + o(1)} for s = o(log n); the proof yields the explicit constant 2^{100s} in the bound f_s(n) <= 2^{100s} sqrt n log n for n >= 2. The method combines the ideas of Wolfovitz and of Dudek, Retter and Rödl with the Mattheus-Verstraete construction, using only Chernoff bounds, a Janson-type estimate for K_s-freeness of random s-partite graphs (Proposition 2), and the Lovász local lemma, deliberately avoiding the container method. This is the state-of-the-art upper bound for the Erdős-Rogers problem recorded as Problem 620.
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02548.
Bears on. #620
Results to transcribe.
- Theorem 1: For each fixed s >= 3, f_s(n) = O(sqrt(n) log n); the proof gives f_s(n) <= 2^{100s} sqrt(n) log n for n >= 2, hence f_s(n) = n^{1/2+o(1)} when s = o(log n) (page theorem_1).
- Equation (1): The known lower bound f_s(n) = Omega(sqrt(n log n)/log log n) for all s >= 3, derived from Shearer's independent-set bound for K_{s+1}-free graphs; Shearer's paper is not held and the bound is second-hand here (page equation_1).
- Proposition 2: Janson-inequality bound: for s >= 3, n >= 2^{40s} and rho = (8s/n)^{2/s}, a random s-partite graph on color classes of size at least n/2s contains K_s except with probability exp(-2^{2s-4} n).
- Proposition 3: The Lovász local lemma in the form used for the construction.