Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Velammal 1995 is binomial coefficient squarefree

../

main_theorem: Velammal's proof of the Erdős conjecture that the binomial coefficient of 2n choose n is not squarefree for any n greater than 4.

theorem_2: Velammal's digit criterion: if at least two base-P digits of n are at least (P+1)/2, for a prime P, then P^2 divides the binomial coefficient of 2n choose n.

theorem_p24: Velammal's explicit form of Sárközy's theorem: for every n at least 2^8000 the binomial coefficient of 2n choose n is not squarefree.


Velammal, G., Is the binomial coefficient {(2nn)\binom {2n}n} squarefree?. Hardy-Ramanujan J. 18 (1995), 23--45. DOI 10.46298/hrj.1995.132. No notice is printed in the scan (its first page, p. 23, carries only the header "Hardy-Ramanujan Journal Vol.18 (1995) 23-45"); the article's page shows only "Hal authorisation v1", a deposit authorization and not a reuse grant (https://hrj.episciences.org/132, read 2026-10-02); the journal's home page offers the collection free of charge and names no license (https://hrj.episciences.org/, read 2026-10-02), and its publishing-policies page states Diamond Open Access under "Creative Commons - Attribution - CC BY 4.0" for published articles without stating that the policy covers the digitized back volumes (https://hrj.episciences.org/page/publishing-policies, read 2026-10-02); the term is unstated.

The paper proves Erdős's conjecture that the central binomial coefficient (2nn)\binom{2n}{n} is not squarefree for any n>4n>4. Sárközy had shown this for all sufficiently large nn, using Jutila's estimates for sums ∑p≤xe(2πiθ/p)\sum_{p\le x}e(2\pi i\theta/p) to estimate ∑p≤xlog⁡p e2πiθ/p\sum_{p\le x}\log p\,e^{2\pi i\theta/p}; Velammal instead applies Vaughan's identity and the theory of exponent pairs, which gives better estimates, and computes the constants explicitly. The unnumbered Theorem (p. 24) states that (2nn)\binom{2n}{n} is never squarefree for n≥28000n\ge2^{8000}. Writing (2nn)=(s(n))2q(n)\binom{2n}{n}=(s(n))^2q(n) with q(n)q(n) squarefree, the proof bounds log⁡s(n)\log s(n) below by the sum of log⁡p\log p over primes p∈(n,2n ]p\in(\sqrt n,\sqrt{2n}\,] with {n/p}≥1/2\{n/p\}\ge1/2, each of which divides (2nn)\binom{2n}{n} to at least the second power, and shows that sum positive. The range 4<n<280004<n<2^{8000} is handled by direct methods: Theorem 2 (p. 43) gives P2∣(2nn)P^2\mid\binom{2n}{n} when at least two base-PP digits of nn are at least (P+1)/2(P+1)/2; the paper's P=2P=2 step leaves only n=2jn=2^j, 2<j≤80002<j\le8000, and a computer check finds a prime P<100P<100 meeting the hypothesis of Theorem 2 for each such jj except j=4j=4, where 32∣(3216)3^2\mid\binom{32}{16} is recorded directly. A postscript (p. 45) records that J. W. Sander, J. Number Theory 46 (1994), 372--384, points out that G. Velammal, A. Granville and O. Ramaré proved the conjecture independently of each other.

Source: https://hrj.episciences.org/132.

Bears on. #175: the main theorem (abstract, p. 23; proof completed p. 43) is the problem's statement, that (2nn)\binom{2n}{n} is not squarefree for any n≥5n\ge5, proved for every such nn; the Theorem (p. 24) proves it for n≥28000n\ge2^{8000} and Theorem 2 (p. 43), with the computation reported after it, is the paper's means for the range 4<n<280004<n<2^{8000}.

Results.

  • Main theorem (abstract, p. 23; proof completed p. 43): (2nn)\binom{2n}{n} is not squarefree for any n>4n>4.
  • Theorem (p. 24): for n≥28000n\ge2^{8000}, (2nn)\binom{2n}{n} is never squarefree.
  • Theorem 2 (p. 43): if at least two base-PP digits of nn are at least (P+1)/2(P+1)/2, for a prime PP, then P2∣(2nn)P^2\mid\binom{2n}{n}.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.