Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Inverse zero-sum problems and algebraic invariants

../

proposition_2_3: Girard's proposition that the paper's Conjecture 1.2, that a zero-sumfree sequence of length at least d*(G) in G = C_{n_1} ⊕ ... ⊕ C_{n_r} has cross number at most the sum of (n_i - 1)/n_i, holds when G is a finite cyclic group or a finite abelian p-group.

theorem_2_4: Girard's theorem that in G = C_m ⊕ C_mn, for all positive integers m and n, every zero-sumfree sequence of length at least d*(G) = m + mn - 2 has cross number at most (m-1)/m + (mn-1)/(mn), so less than 2, which is the paper's Conjecture 1.2 for every finite abelian group of rank two.

theorem_2_5: Girard's theorem that in G = C_m ⊕ C_mn, for all positive integers m and n, a zero-sumfree sequence of length d(G) = m + mn - 2 has at least mn - 1 elements of order mn when n is a prime power, and at least the ceiling of 4mn/5 + (n-5)/5 such elements otherwise.

theorem_7_2: Girard's theorem that when the positive integer n is not a prime power, every zero-sumfree sequence in C_n with cross number at least k*(C_n) has length at most the floor of n/2, the cyclic evidence for his Conjecture 7.1.


Source

Benjamin Girard, Inverse zero-sum problems and algebraic invariants, Acta Arithmetica 135 (3) (2008), 231–246, DOI 10.4064/aa135-3-3. The copy read for this card is arXiv:0806.3676v2, revised 18 October 2010. The journal record is available through EuDML. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:0806.3676), every other right reserved.

Definitions and invariants

A sequence S=(g1,…,gℓ)S=(g_1,\ldots,g_\ell) in a finite abelian group GG is zero-sumfree when no nonempty subsum is zero. If G≃Cn1⊕⋯⊕CnrG\simeq C_{n_1}\oplus\cdots\oplus C_{n_r} with 1<n1∣⋯∣nr1<n_1\mid\cdots\mid n_r, the paper writes

D∗(G)=1+∑i=1r(ni−1),d∗(G)=D∗(G)−1.D^*(G)=1+\sum_{i=1}^r(n_i-1),\qquad d^*(G)=D^*(G)-1.

For a sequence SS in GG, its cross number is

k(S)=∑g∈S1ord⁡(g),k(S)=\sum_{g\in S}\frac1{\operatorname{ord}(g)},

and k(G)k(G) is the maximum of k(S)k(S) over zero-sumfree sequences in GG. If G≃Cν1⊕⋯⊕CνsG\simeq C_{\nu_1}\oplus\cdots\oplus C_{\nu_s}, with every νi>1\nu_i>1, is the longest possible decomposition of GG into cyclic groups, k∗(G)=∑i=1s(νi−1)/νik^*(G)=\sum_{i=1}^s(\nu_i-1)/\nu_i (PDF p. 2).

Main inverse statements

Theorem 1.1 (PDF p. 3) gathers two known exact cases from earlier work. If pp is prime, r≥1r\ge1, and a1≤⋯≤ara_1\le\cdots\le a_r are positive integers, then for

G≃Cpa1⊕⋯⊕Cpar,G\simeq C_{p^{a_1}}\oplus\cdots\oplus C_{p^{a_r}},

one has

D(G)=∑i=1r(pai−1)+1=D∗(G),D(G)=\sum_{i=1}^r(p^{a_i}-1)+1=D^*(G),

and

k(G)=∑i=1rpai−1pai=k∗(G).k(G)=\sum_{i=1}^r\frac{p^{a_i}-1}{p^{a_i}}=k^*(G).

For every m,n≥1m,n\ge1, it also states

D(Cm⊕Cmn)=m+mn−1=D∗(Cm⊕Cmn),D(C_m\oplus C_{mn})=m+mn-1=D^*(C_m\oplus C_{mn}),

so D(Cn)=nD(C_n)=n.

Conjecture 1.2 (PDF p. 3) states that, for every finite abelian G≃Cn1⊕⋯⊕CnrG\simeq C_{n_1}\oplus\cdots\oplus C_{n_r} with 1<n1∣⋯∣nr1<n_1\mid\cdots\mid n_r, every zero-sumfree SS with ∣S∣≥d∗(G)|S|\ge d^*(G) satisfies

k(S)≤∑i=1rni−1ni.k(S)\le\sum_{i=1}^r\frac{n_i-1}{n_i}.

The stated consequence is k(S)<rk(S)<r.

Proposition 2.3 (PDF p. 4) proves Conjecture 1.2 for finite cyclic groups and for finite abelian pp-groups. Propositions 2.1 and 2.2 (PDF p. 4) draw consequences of the conjecture where it holds: for CnrC_n^r it gives D(Cnr)=r(n−1)+1D(C_n^r)=r(n-1)+1 with every zero-sumfree sequence of length r(n−1)r(n-1) made of elements of order nn, and in general it gives D(G)≤∑i=1r(nr/ni)(ni−1)+1D(G)\le\sum_{i=1}^r(n_r/n_i)(n_i-1)+1.

Rank-two results

Proposition 1.3 (PDF p. 3), which the paper attributes to W. Gao and A. Geroldinger, concerns G≃Cm⊕CmnG\simeq C_m\oplus C_{mn} and a zero-sumfree sequence SS of length d(G)=m+mn−2d(G)=m+mn-2. It states that every g∈Sg\in S satisfies m∣ord⁡(g)∣mnm\mid\operatorname{ord}(g)\mid mn, and that at least

m+mn−n(2m−2P−(n)+1)−1≥m−1m+mn-n\left(\frac{2m-2}{P^-(n)}+1\right)-1\ge m-1

elements of SS have order mnmn, where P−(n)P^-(n) is the smallest prime divisor of nn.

The paper defines Property B by saying that n≥2n\ge2 has Property B when every zero-sumfree sequence of length 2n−22n-2 in Cn⊕CnC_n\oplus C_n contains an element with multiplicity at least n−2n-2 (PDF pp. 3–4); it records the conjecture that every n≥2n\ge2 has this property.

Theorem 2.4 (PDF p. 5) proves Conjecture 1.2 for every rank-two group Cm⊕CmnC_m\oplus C_{mn}, m,n≥1m,n\ge1: if SS is zero-sumfree and ∣S∣≥d∗(G)=m+mn−2|S|\ge d^*(G)=m+mn-2, then

k(S)≤m−1m+mn−1mn<2.k(S)\le\frac{m-1}{m}+\frac{mn-1}{mn}<2.

Theorem 2.5 (PDF p. 5) gives the corresponding order concentration for a sequence of length m+mn−2m+mn-2. If nn is a prime power, at least mn−1mn-1 elements have order mnmn. If nn is not a prime power, at least

⌈45mn+n−55⌉\left\lceil\frac45mn+\frac{n-5}{5}\right\rceil

elements have order mnmn.

Longest cyclic decompositions

Conjecture 7.1 (PDF p. 15) states that, for a longest cyclic decomposition G≃⨁iCνiG\simeq\bigoplus_i C_{\nu_i}, a zero-sumfree SS with k(S)≥k∗(G)k(S)\ge k^*(G) must satisfy

∣S∣≤∑i(νi−1).|S|\le\sum_i(\nu_i-1).

Theorem 7.2 (PDF p. 15) gives a cyclic case: if nn is not a prime power and SS is zero-sumfree in CnC_n with k(S)≥k∗(Cn)k(S)\ge k^*(C_n), then

∣S∣≤⌊n2⌋.|S|\le\left\lfloor\frac n2\right\rfloor.

Read status

Claims checked for Theorem 1.1, Conjecture 1.2, Propositions 1.3 and 2.1 to 2.3, Theorems 2.4, 2.5 and 7.2 and Conjecture 7.1, read clause by clause on the page images of the edition named above, with the proofs of Sections 3, 5, 6 and 7 followed. Theorem 1.1, Proposition 1.3, Proposition 4.2, the Geroldinger--Halter-Koch theorem used for Proposition 2.3 (i) and the Savchev--Chen theorem used for Theorem 7.2 are cited by the paper and were not read in their sources. Nothing here is independently reviewed. Result pages: Proposition 2.3, Theorem 2.4, Theorem 2.5 and Theorem 7.2.

Bears on. None: the paper is a zero-sum source on the Davenport constant and the cross number of finite abelian groups, and it mentions no Erdős problem.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.