Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Alford 1994 infinitely many carmichael numbers
theorem_1: The paper's main theorem: for each E in the set of smooth-shifted-prime exponents and each B in the set of admissible progression exponents, the number of Carmichael numbers up to x is at least x to the EB for all large x; with the known members of the two sets this gives more than x to the 2/7 Carmichael numbers up to x for all large x.
theorem_3: Every exponent B admissible for primes in arithmetic progressions yields smooth shifted primes: the whole interval (0,B) lies in the set of exponents E for which a positive proportion of primes p up to x have p-1 free of prime factors above x to the 1-E; so B = (0,1) alone would give C(x) = x^{1-o(1)} through Theorem 1.
theorem_4: A conditional result: if for some epsilon the primes up to x congruent to 1 modulo d number at least half their expected count for every d up to x to the 1-epsilon once x is large, then C(x) is at least x to the 1-2epsilon for large x; if this holds for every epsilon, then C(x) = x^{1-o(1)}.
theorem_5: The effective form of the infinitude of Carmichael numbers: for each alpha strictly between 0 and 25/144, the count C(x) of Carmichael numbers up to x is at least x to the alpha from a computable point x(alpha) on.
W. R. Alford, A. Granville and C. Pomerance, There are infinitely many Carmichael numbers, Ann. of Math. (2) 139 (1994), no. 3, 703--722 (received 11 August 1992). The scan's running head prints "Annals of Mathematics, 140 (1994), 703–722"; the volume is 139 in Crossref's record of DOI 10.2307/2118576, and the problem page's entry gives no volume.
The copy read for this card is an image-only scan of the twenty printed pages (physical p. is printed p. ) with no text layer; its identity was confirmed on the page images of the title page, p. 704 and the reference list (pp. 721--722). The statements below were read on the page images of pp. 703--712 and 715--721. Provenance: the copy came from the survey download set of September 2026; the download URL was not recorded. 1,777,857 bytes. No notice is printed in the image-only scan (pages 1 and 20 rendered); the journal's article page, which files the paper under volume 139, issue 3, shows only the footer "Copyright © 2026 Annals of Mathematics" and names no license (https://annals.math.princeton.edu/1994/193-3/p06, the site's own path, read 2026-10-07), and the JSTOR page for DOI 10.2307/2118576 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118576) did not render on 2026-10-02, every other right reserved.
Read status: claims checked for Theorems 1, 3, 4 and 5 and the consequence (pp. 705--708), each recorded on its result page; the proofs (pp. 709--721) were located but not checked.
Contents
counts the Carmichael numbers up to : composite with for all integers , equivalently (Korselt's criterion, p. 703) composite squarefree with for every prime .
- Introduction (pp. 703--704): Carmichael's 1910 examples and his hope that the list "might be indefinitely extended"; Chernick's form , Carmichael whenever the three factors are prime, hence infinitely often under the prime -tuples conjecture; Pinch's counts ( up to , up to , up to , up to ); the best upper bound (Pomerance, Selfridge and Wagstaff [PSW]; Pomerance [Po], filed as pomerance_1989_two_methods_elementary_analytic_number_theory), which the authors believe gives the true size of , on the heuristic of [Po] based on Erdős's ideas in [Er2] (Erdős 1956, filed as erdos_1956_pseudoprimes_carmichael_numbers).
- The constants (pp. 704--705): counts the primes with free of prime factors exceeding ; is the set of for which some and give for all (0.1). Erdős [Er1] (1935) proved nonempty; Friedlander [Fr] gives every ; Erdős conjectured . is the set of for which primes in progressions satisfy (0.3) for , and , except for divisible by a member of an exceptional set of at most integers exceeding ; follows from the Huxley--Jutila zero-density bounds (section 2).
- Theorem 1 (p. 705): for each and there is such that for all . Hence for every and all large , with , and in particular for all large (p. 705).
- Method (p. 706): following Erdős's heuristic [Er2], find with many primes such that ; a product of distinct such primes congruent to modulo is Carmichael by Korselt's criterion, and Theorem 2 (p. 706; due to van Emde Boas and Kruyswijk, extending a theorem due independently to Kruyswijk and Olson) supplies such products: in a finite abelian group whose maximal element order is , any sequence of at least elements has a nonempty subsequence whose product is the identity. The construction of adapts Prachar's construction of integers with many divisors of the form (p. 706).
- Theorem 3 (p. 707): for each , ; so the assumption alone would give, through Theorem 1, Erdős's conjecture for large .
- Theorem 4 (p. 707): if for some the bound holds for all positive integers once , then for large ; if it holds for every , then .
- Theorem 5 (p. 708): for each with there is a computable with for all . The paper also notes (p. 708) that Theorem 1 settles Duparc's problem on numbers that are pseudoprimes to both bases and .
- Section 1 (pp. 709--711): Theorem 1.1 (p. 709) restates Theorem 2 as , and Proposition 1.2 (p. 711) counts subsequences with product the identity. Section 2 (pp. 711--715): Theorem 2.1 (p. 712), a prime number theorem for progressions outside a bounded set of exceptional moduli, giving . Section 3 (pp. 715--717): Theorem 3.1 (p. 715), the modification of Prachar's theorem. Section 4 (pp. 717--719): Theorem 4.1 (p. 717), for large . Section 5 (pp. 719--721): Proposition 5.1 (p. 719), for some , which with Theorem 4.1 gives Theorem 1 (p. 717), and the proof of Theorem 3 (pp. 720--721).
Result pages: Theorem 1, Theorem 3, Theorem 4, Theorem 5.
Compiled scope
Pages 703--712 and 715--722 were read on the page images for the statements, labels and section ranges above; no proof was checked and nothing here is independently reviewed.
Bears on. #1057: the first proof that , with for large ; by the statement of Theorem 1 the problem's would follow if and could both be taken arbitrarily close to , of which is Erdős's conjecture recorded on p. 704; by Theorem 3 (p. 707) the conjecture alone would suffice, and Theorem 4 (p. 707) derives from a lower bound for primes uniformly for , for every , which the paper does not prove; Theorem 5 (p. 708) gives the effective bound for . None of these decides the problem. The paper also records the proved upper bound of [PSW] and [Po] and the authors' belief that it gives the true size of .
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.