Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Alford 1994 infinitely many carmichael numbers

../

theorem_1: The paper's main theorem: for each E in the set of smooth-shifted-prime exponents and each B in the set of admissible progression exponents, the number of Carmichael numbers up to x is at least x to the EB for all large x; with the known members of the two sets this gives more than x to the 2/7 Carmichael numbers up to x for all large x.

theorem_3: Every exponent B admissible for primes in arithmetic progressions yields smooth shifted primes: the whole interval (0,B) lies in the set of exponents E for which a positive proportion of primes p up to x have p-1 free of prime factors above x to the 1-E; so B = (0,1) alone would give C(x) = x^{1-o(1)} through Theorem 1.

theorem_4: A conditional result: if for some epsilon the primes up to x congruent to 1 modulo d number at least half their expected count for every d up to x to the 1-epsilon once x is large, then C(x) is at least x to the 1-2epsilon for large x; if this holds for every epsilon, then C(x) = x^{1-o(1)}.

theorem_5: The effective form of the infinitude of Carmichael numbers: for each alpha strictly between 0 and 25/144, the count C(x) of Carmichael numbers up to x is at least x to the alpha from a computable point x(alpha) on.


W. R. Alford, A. Granville and C. Pomerance, There are infinitely many Carmichael numbers, Ann. of Math. (2) 139 (1994), no. 3, 703--722 (received 11 August 1992). The scan's running head prints "Annals of Mathematics, 140 (1994), 703–722"; the volume is 139 in Crossref's record of DOI 10.2307/2118576, and the problem page's entry gives no volume.

The copy read for this card is an image-only scan of the twenty printed pages (physical p. nn is printed p. 702+n702+n) with no text layer; its identity was confirmed on the page images of the title page, p. 704 and the reference list (pp. 721--722). The statements below were read on the page images of pp. 703--712 and 715--721. Provenance: the copy came from the survey download set of September 2026; the download URL was not recorded. 1,777,857 bytes. No notice is printed in the image-only scan (pages 1 and 20 rendered); the journal's article page, which files the paper under volume 139, issue 3, shows only the footer "Copyright © 2026 Annals of Mathematics" and names no license (https://annals.math.princeton.edu/1994/193-3/p06, the site's own path, read 2026-10-07), and the JSTOR page for DOI 10.2307/2118576 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118576) did not render on 2026-10-02, every other right reserved.

Read status: claims checked for Theorems 1, 3, 4 and 5 and the consequence C(x)>x2/7C(x)>x^{2/7} (pp. 705--708), each recorded on its result page; the proofs (pp. 709--721) were located but not checked.

Contents

C(x)C(x) counts the Carmichael numbers up to xx: composite nn with an≡a(modn)a^n\equiv a\pmod n for all integers aa, equivalently (Korselt's criterion, p. 703) composite squarefree nn with p−1∣n−1p-1\mid n-1 for every prime p∣np\mid n.

  • Introduction (pp. 703--704): Carmichael's 1910 examples and his hope that the list "might be indefinitely extended"; Chernick's form (6m+1)(12m+1)(18m+1)(6m+1)(12m+1)(18m+1), Carmichael whenever the three factors are prime, hence infinitely often under the prime kk-tuples conjecture; Pinch's counts (8,2418{,}241 up to 101210^{12}, 19,27919{,}279 up to 101310^{13}, 44,70644{,}706 up to 101410^{14}, 105,212105{,}212 up to 101510^{15}); the best upper bound C(x)≤x1−{1+o(1)}log⁡log⁡log⁡x/log⁡log⁡xC(x)\le x^{1-\{1+o(1)\}\log\log\log x/\log\log x} (Pomerance, Selfridge and Wagstaff [PSW]; Pomerance [Po], filed as pomerance_1989_two_methods_elementary_analytic_number_theory), which the authors believe gives the true size of C(x)C(x), on the heuristic of [Po] based on Erdős's ideas in [Er2] (Erdős 1956, filed as erdos_1956_pseudoprimes_carmichael_numbers).
  • The constants (pp. 704--705): π(x,y)\pi(x,y) counts the primes p≤xp\le x with p−1p-1 free of prime factors exceeding yy; E\mathcal E is the set of E∈(0,1)E\in(0,1) for which some x1(E)x_1(E) and γ1(E)>0\gamma_1(E)>0 give π(x,x1−E)≥γ1(E)π(x)\pi(x,x^{1-E})\ge\gamma_1(E)\pi(x) for all x≥x1(E)x\ge x_1(E) (0.1). Erdős [Er1] (1935) proved E\mathcal E nonempty; Friedlander [Fr] gives every E<1−(2e)−1E<1-(2\sqrt e)^{-1}; Erdős conjectured E=(0,1)\mathcal E=(0,1). B\mathcal B is the set of B∈(0,1)B\in(0,1) for which primes in progressions satisfy π(y;d,a)≥π(y)/(2φ(d))\pi(y;d,a)\ge\pi(y)/(2\varphi(d)) (0.3) for x≥x2(B)x\ge x_2(B), (a,d)=1(a,d)=1 and 1≤d≤min⁡{xB,y/x1−B}1\le d\le\min\{x^B,y/x^{1-B}\}, except for dd divisible by a member of an exceptional set of at most DBD_B integers exceeding log⁡x\log x; (0,5/12)⊂B(0,5/12)\subset\mathcal B follows from the Huxley--Jutila zero-density bounds (section 2).
  • Theorem 1 (p. 705): for each E∈EE\in\mathcal E and B∈BB\in\mathcal B there is x0=x0(E,B)x_0=x_0(E,B) such that C(x)≥xEBC(x)\ge x^{EB} for all x≥x0x\ge x_0. Hence C(x)≥xβ−εC(x)\ge x^{\beta-\varepsilon} for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 and all large xx, with β=(1−(2e)−1)⋅5/12=0.290306…\beta=(1-(2\sqrt e)^{-1})\cdot5/12=0.290306\ldots, and in particular C(x)>x2/7C(x)>x^{2/7} for all large xx (p. 705).
  • Method (p. 706): following Erdős's heuristic [Er2], find LL with many primes pp such that p−1∣Lp-1\mid L; a product of distinct such primes congruent to 11 modulo LL is Carmichael by Korselt's criterion, and Theorem 2 (p. 706; due to van Emde Boas and Kruyswijk, extending a theorem due independently to Kruyswijk and Olson) supplies such products: in a finite abelian group GG whose maximal element order is mm, any sequence of at least m(1+log⁡(∣G∣/m))m(1+\log(|G|/m)) elements has a nonempty subsequence whose product is the identity. The construction of LL adapts Prachar's construction of integers with many divisors of the form p−1p-1 (p. 706).
  • Theorem 3 (p. 707): for each B∈BB\in\mathcal B, (0,B)⊂E(0,B)\subset\mathcal E; so the assumption B=(0,1)\mathcal B=(0,1) alone would give, through Theorem 1, Erdős's conjecture C(x)≥x1−εC(x)\ge x^{1-\varepsilon} for large xx.
  • Theorem 4 (p. 707): if for some ε>0\varepsilon>0 the bound π(x;d,1)≥π(x)/(2φ(d))\pi(x;d,1)\ge\pi(x)/(2\varphi(d)) holds for all positive integers d≤x1−εd\le x^{1-\varepsilon} once x≥xεx\ge x_\varepsilon, then C(x)≥x1−2εC(x)\ge x^{1-2\varepsilon} for large xx; if it holds for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, then C(x)=x1−o(1)C(x)=x^{1-o(1)}.
  • Theorem 5 (p. 708): for each α\alpha with 0<α<25/1440<\alpha<25/144 there is a computable x(α)x(\alpha) with C(x)≥xαC(x)\ge x^\alpha for all x≥x(α)x\ge x(\alpha). The paper also notes (p. 708) that Theorem 1 settles Duparc's problem on numbers that are pseudoprimes to both bases 22 and 33.
  • Section 1 (pp. 709--711): Theorem 1.1 (p. 709) restates Theorem 2 as n(G)<m(1+log⁡(∣G∣/m))n(G)<m(1+\log(|G|/m)), and Proposition 1.2 (p. 711) counts subsequences with product the identity. Section 2 (pp. 711--715): Theorem 2.1 (p. 712), a prime number theorem for progressions outside a bounded set of exceptional moduli, giving (0,5/12)⊂B(0,5/12)\subset\mathcal B. Section 3 (pp. 715--717): Theorem 3.1 (p. 715), the modification of Prachar's theorem. Section 4 (pp. 717--719): Theorem 4.1 (p. 717), C(x)≥xEB−εC(x)\ge x^{EB-\varepsilon} for large xx. Section 5 (pp. 719--721): Proposition 5.1 (p. 719), E=(0,E0)\mathcal E=(0,E_0) for some 0<E0≤10<E_0\le1, which with Theorem 4.1 gives Theorem 1 (p. 717), and the proof of Theorem 3 (pp. 720--721).

Result pages: Theorem 1, Theorem 3, Theorem 4, Theorem 5.

Compiled scope

Pages 703--712 and 715--722 were read on the page images for the statements, labels and section ranges above; no proof was checked and nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #1057: the first proof that C(x)→∞C(x)\to\infty, with C(x)>x2/7C(x)>x^{2/7} for large xx; by the statement of Theorem 1 the problem's C(x)=x1−o(1)C(x)=x^{1-o(1)} would follow if EE and BB could both be taken arbitrarily close to 11, of which E=(0,1)\mathcal E=(0,1) is Erdős's conjecture recorded on p. 704; by Theorem 3 (p. 707) the conjecture B=(0,1)\mathcal B=(0,1) alone would suffice, and Theorem 4 (p. 707) derives C(x)=x1−o(1)C(x)=x^{1-o(1)} from a lower bound for primes ≡1 mod d\equiv1\bmod d uniformly for d≤x1−εd\le x^{1-\varepsilon}, for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, which the paper does not prove; Theorem 5 (p. 708) gives the effective bound C(x)≥xαC(x)\ge x^\alpha for α<25/144\alpha<25/144. None of these decides the problem. The paper also records the proved upper bound of [PSW] and [Po] and the authors' belief that it gives the true size of C(x)C(x).

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.