Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Proposition 1.3, pp. 298--299, and its proof in Section 2 (pp. 299--301), of N. Alon and G. Freiman, On sums of subsets of a set of integers, Combinatorica 8 (4) (1988), 297--306, doi:10.1007/BF02189086; the edition read is named on the source card.

Statement

Proposition 1.3 (pp. 298--299). Let A={a1,a2,…,ax}A=\{a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_x\} be a subset of cardinality xx of N={1,2,…,n}N=\{1,2,\ldots,n\}, and put

SA=12∑i=1xai,BA=12(∑i=1xai2)1/2.S_A=\frac12\sum_{i=1}^{x}a_i, \qquad B_A=\frac12\Bigl(\sum_{i=1}^{x}a_i^2\Bigr)^{1/2}.

Suppose x>n2/3+εx>n^{2/3+\varepsilon}, where ε>0\varepsilon>0 and n>n0(ε)n>n_0(\varepsilon), and suppose that, as in (1.6),

∣{i:ai≡0(modq)}∣≤x−n2/3for all q≥2.\bigl|\{i: a_i\equiv0\pmod q\}\bigr|\le x-n^{2/3} \quad\text{for all }q\ge2 .

Then every integer MM with ∣M−SA∣≤BA|M-S_A|\le B_A (1.7) belongs to A∗A^*, the set of subset sums of AA. Moreover the number of representations of MM as ∑i=1xεiai\sum_{i=1}^{x}\varepsilon_ia_i with εi∈{0,1}\varepsilon_i\in\{0,1\} is, as in (1.8),

(1+o(1)) 2x2πBA2 e−(M−SA)2/(2BA2).(1+o(1))\,\frac{2^x}{\sqrt{2\pi B_A^2}}\, e^{-(M-S_A)^2/(2B_A^2)} .

The paper calls the proposition "somewhat technical" (p. 298) and derives from it the upper bounds (1.3) and (1.5) and Theorem 1.2.

Proof pointer

Section 2 (pp. 299--301), by the circle method. The count is 2x∫01∏j12(1+e2πiαaj)e−2πiαM dα2^x\int_0^1\prod_j\frac12(1+e^{2\pi i\alpha a_j})e^{-2\pi i\alpha M}\,d\alpha; with L=⌈n1+ε⌉L=\lceil n^{1+\varepsilon}\rceil the paper splits the circle into the major arc [−1/L,1/L][-1/L,1/L] and the minor arc [1/L,1−1/L][1/L,1-1/L]. The integrand is bounded by 1/n31/n^3 on the minor arc, in three cases by the denominator qq of a rational approximation to α\alpha, hypothesis (1.6) entering in the case q<10n/xq<10n/x; on the major arc a Taylor expansion reduces the integral to a Gaussian integral, which gives (1.8).

Read depth

Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause on the page images of the print, and the proof of Section 2 was followed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on

No problem directly. The proposition is the tool behind Theorem 1.2 (Problem 771) and Proposition 1.1 (Problem 587).