Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
On sums of subsets of a set of integers
proposition_1_1: Alon and Freiman's estimates for p(n,r), the largest subset of {1,...,n} no subset sum of which is an r-th power: the asymptotic (1+o(1)) 2^{1/(r+1)} n^{(r-1)/(r+1)} for fixed r >= 6, and an upper bound n^{2/3+eps} for 2 <= r <= 5.
proposition_1_3: Alon and Freiman's analytic proposition that a subset of {1,...,n} with more than n^{2/3+eps} elements, no residue class 0 mod q holding more than x - n^{2/3} of them, has every integer within B_A of S_A as a subset sum, with (1+o(1)) 2^x e^{-(M-S_A)^2/2B_A^2}/sqrt(2 pi B_A^2) representations.
theorem_1_2: Alon and Freiman's theorem that, for every eps > 0, n > n(eps) and every m with 3n^{5/3+eps} < m < n^2/(20 log^2 n), the largest subset of {1,...,n} with no subset summing to m has floor(n/s) + s - 2 elements, where s is the least integer not dividing m.
Alon, N. and Freiman, G., On sums of subsets of a set of integers. Combinatorica 8 (4) (1988), 297-306. DOI: 10.1007/BF02189086.
Source: https://web.math.princeton.edu/~nalon/PDFS/publications.html. The scan's header reads "Akadémiai Kiadó — Springer-Verlag" and no copyright line is printed; the scan read for this card comes from the author's publications page (https://web.math.princeton.edu/~nalon/PDFS/publications.html, read 2026-10-02), which states no terms, and the publisher's article page for DOI 10.1007/BF02189086 (read 2026-10-02 through its cookie redirect) offers the PDF behind a paywall with a "Reprints and permissions" link, no Creative Commons or Open Access statement and no article-year copyright line, only the site footer "© 2026 Springer Nature", every other right reserved.
For write for its set of subset sums. The paper's main result, Theorem 1.2 (p. 298), determines , the largest size of an with , as with the least integer not dividing , for every , and ; the lower bound is Lemma 4.1 (p. 304), valid for every sufficiently large and every . Proposition 1.1 (p. 298) bounds , the largest size of an with no -th power in : for fixed , and for and . Both rest on the analytic Proposition 1.3 (pp. 298--299): if , , and no residue class , , holds more than elements of , every integer within of half the total of is a subset sum, with a Gaussian count of representations. Section 5 (p. 306) states, without proof, two results of Erdős and Freiman that Proposition 1.3 can prove (Propositions 5.1 and 5.2: for large every -subset of has a power of 2 in , and for , , a square-free number), and the authors' belief that for every fixed .
Read status: claims checked. The statements of Theorem 1.2, Lemma 4.1 and Propositions 1.1 and 1.3 were read clause by clause on the print and their proofs in Sections 2 to 4 followed; nothing is independently reviewed.
Bears on. #771: with the largest size of a set no subset of which sums to , Theorem 1.2 (p. 298) gives , where is the least integer not dividing , for every , and . The consequence drawn on p. 298, an for every with , with the lower bound for all that the paper credits to Erdős and Graham, verifies their conjecture, as the paper says.
Bears on. #587: Proposition 1.1(ii) with (p. 298), which is (1.3) (p. 297), bounds the largest subset of with no square subset sum by for every and ; the lower bound (1.1), which the paper credits to Erdős, is . The paper does not determine the order.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.