Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Chojecki 2026 second term strongly 2 primitive sets

../

lemma_2_1: If every member of a strongly 2-primitive set A is written as a product of two members of a set B, then A has at most as many elements as B; the combinatorial step of the manuscript's upper bound for Problem 793.

lemma_2_2: The integers up to n^(3/5), the primes in (n^(3/5), n], the products of two primes up to n^(1/3), and the products qr of primes with n^(1/3) < q <= n^(2/5) and r <= n/q^2 together form a set of which every integer up to n is a product of two members.

lemma_2_3: As n tends to infinity, the sum of pi(n/q^2) over the primes q with n^(1/3) < q <= n^(2/5) is (9 + o(1)) n^(2/3)/(log n)^2, which is the count of the fourth basis class in the manuscript's upper bound.

lemma_3_1: For a linear family of triples of distinct primes, each with product at most n, the primes up to n outside the triples together with the triple products form a strongly 2-primitive set of size pi(n) minus the number of primes used plus the number of triples.

lemma_3_2: For every h > 0 the weight series over the index cells of the manuscript's lower-bound construction sums exactly to e^(-h) + e^(-2h)/2, which tends to 3/2 as h tends to 0.

lemma_3_3: For a fixed h and a finite set of index cells, the family of prime triples built from proper edge-colorings between logarithmic prime bins is linear, and its size divided by (n^(1/3)/log n)^2 tends to nine times the chosen cells' weight.

proposition_2_4: The upper half of the manuscript's theorem: every subset of one through n in which no member divides the product of two others has at most pi(n) + (27/2 + o(1)) n^(2/3)/(log n)^2 elements.

proposition_3_4: The lower half of the manuscript's theorem: there are subsets of one through n in which no member divides the product of two others with at least pi(n) + (27/2 - o(1)) n^(2/3)/(log n)^2 elements.

theorem_1_1: The second-order asymptotic for the largest subset of one through n in which no member divides the product of two others; the site's accepted resolution of Problem 793, from a manuscript whose author declares AI assistance.


Przemek Chojecki, The second term for strongly 2-primitive sets. A five-page manuscript hosted at https://www.ulam.ai/research/erdos793.pdf (2026), also posted as arXiv:2607.15306 (one version, submitted 14 July 2026, with the same title, author and abstract; abstract page read). The byline names Przemek Chojecki with the affiliation ulam.ai; the text carries no date, no arXiv identifier and no journal; the PDF metadata gives a creation date of 13 July 2026, and its reference [1] records the site's Problem 793 page as "accessed". The site's Problem 793 page accepted the manuscript as the resolution on 14 July 2026 (the page's last edit) after a thread comment of 13 July 2026 by the author linked it.

The copy read for this card is the PDF at that URL, five A4 pages produced by pdfTeX with a complete text layer, read in the text layer and on the page images of pp. 1--5. Provenance: retrieved from the URL above (HTTP 200, one request); 287,546 bytes. That copy, retrieved from the hosting organization's site (https://www.ulam.ai/research/erdos793.pdf), carries no arXiv stamp and prints only the "ulam.ai" affiliation and no notice; the arXiv abstract page of the same paper, its only version with the same title and author, names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15306, read 2026-10-02), and the site's footer reads "© 2017-2026 ULAM" (read 2026-10-02), every other right reserved.

Attribution as the manuscript states it: the footnote to the byline (p. 1) reads "AI assistance was used in exploring the argument and in writing this text." The site's commentary attributes the solution to an AI model prompted by the author; the author's thread comment of 13 July 2026 says a model "gave me a nice solution". The card records these declarations as the source's and the site's own provenance and claims no independent check of the argument. This is a source-supported solution accepted by the site, distinct from a claim of journal refereeing; the arXiv posting is not refereeing. One external Lean development read statically at a pinned commit is listed under Formal artifacts below; it was not built here.

Read status: claims checked for Theorem 1.1, Lemmas 2.1--2.3, Proposition 2.4, Lemmas 3.1--3.3 and Proposition 3.4 (statements read clause by clause in the text layer and on the page images of pp. 1--5); the proofs (pp. 2--5) were read for their structure and not checked step by step; nothing here is independently reviewed.

Contents

  • Section 1, Introduction (p. 1): a set of positive integers is strongly 2-primitive when none of its members divides a product of two members other than itself, "where the latter two need not be distinct", that is, display (1) a∤bca\nmid bc for a,b,c∈Aa,b,c\in A with a≠ba\ne b, a≠ca\ne c; the text notes that "the more recent convention" (its reference [2], Chan, Lichtman and Pomerance, Combinatorica 42 (2022), 729--747) requires bb and cc to be distinct. Erdős [3] (the 1938 Tomsk paper) proved π(n)+c1n2/3/(log⁡n)2≤F(n)≤π(n)+c2n2/3/(log⁡n)2\pi(n)+c_1n^{2/3}/(\log n)^2\le F(n)\le\pi(n)+c_2n^{2/3}/(\log n)^2 with absolute constants c1,c2>0c_1,c_2>0, and later asked [4] (the 1969 Kalamazoo paper) whether (F(n)−π(n))(log⁡n)2/n2/3(F(n)-\pi(n))(\log n)^2/n^{2/3} tends to a constant; "this is also Erdős Problem 793 [1]". Theorem 1.1: as n→∞n\to\infty, F(n)=π(n)+(272+o(1)) n2/3/(log⁡n)2F(n)=\pi(n)+(\tfrac{27}{2}+o(1))\,n^{2/3}/(\log n)^2. Notation (2): y=n1/3y=n^{1/3}, M=y/log⁡nM=y/\log n, S=M2=n2/3/(log⁡n)2S=M^2=n^{2/3}/(\log n)^2; all logarithms natural; the prime number theorem is used throughout.
  • Section 2, The upper bound (pp. 2--3). Lemma 2.1 (Private factor): if every a∈Aa\in A has a chosen factorization a=uva=uv with u,v∈Bu,v\in B and AA is strongly 2-primitive, then ∣A∣≤∣B∣|A|\le|B| (an injection A→BA\to B built from a factor of strictly larger multiplicity). The basis B=B0∪B1∪B2∪B3B=B_0\cup B_1\cup B_2\cup B_3 with B0=[1,n3/5]B_0=[1,n^{3/5}], B1B_1 the primes in (n3/5,n](n^{3/5},n], B2={pq:p,q≤y prime}B_2=\{pq:p,q\le y\text{ prime}\}, B3={qr:y<q≤n2/5, r≤n/q2 prime}B_3=\{qr:y<q\le n^{2/5},\ r\le n/q^2\text{ prime}\}; Lemma 2.2 (Multiplicative basis): every m≤nm\le n is a product of two members of BB. Lemma 2.3: ∑y<q≤n2/5π(n/q2)=(9+o(1))S\sum_{y<q\le n^{2/5}}\pi(n/q^2)=(9+o(1))S, the sum over primes qq. Proposition 2.4: every strongly 2-primitive A⊆[1,n]A\subseteq[1,n] satisfies ∣A∣≤π(n)+(27/2+o(1))S|A|\le\pi(n)+(27/2+o(1))S, from ∣B2∣=(9/2+o(1))S|B_2|=(9/2+o(1))S, ∣B3∣=(9+o(1))S|B_3|=(9+o(1))S and ∣B0∣+∣B1∣=π(n)+o(S)|B_0|+|B_1|=\pi(n)+o(S). These four classes are the classes (a)--(d) of Lemma II of the 1938 paper (printed p. 75).
  • Section 3, The lower bound (pp. 3--5). Lemma 3.1 (Linear triples): for a linear family HH of triples of distinct primes with products at most nn, the set AHA_H of primes up to nn not in V(H)V(H) together with the triple products is strongly 2-primitive and ∣AH∣=π(n)−∣V(H)∣+∣H∣|A_H|=\pi(n)-|V(H)|+|H|. Index cells (5)--(7), Lemma 3.2 (Cell weight, display (8), value e−h+12e−2he^{-h}+\tfrac12e^{-2h}), prime bins Pr={p:yerh<p≤ye(r+1)h}P_r=\{p:ye^{rh}<p\le ye^{(r+1)h}\} with mr=(3+o(1))MΔrm_r=(3+o(1))M\Delta_r (9), proper edge-colorings of the complete bipartite graph between two bins, or of the complete graph on one bin, with colors injected into a higher bin, Lemma 3.3 (HnH_n is linear; the limit (12) of ∣Hn∣/M2|H_n|/M^2). Proposition 3.4: there are strongly 2-primitive A⊆[1,n]A\subseteq[1,n] with ∣A∣≥π(n)+(27/2−o(1))S|A|\ge\pi(n)+(27/2-o(1))S, since the cell-weight series tends to 3/23/2 as h→0h\to0 and ∣V(Hn)∣=o(S)|V(H_n)|=o(S). "Propositions 2.4 and 3.4 prove Theorem 1.1." (p. 5).
  • References [1]--[4] (p. 5): the site's page; Chan, Lichtman and Pomerance 2022; Erdős 1938; Erdős 1969.

Compiled scope

The whole manuscript was read (five pages). Theorem 1.1 and the eight lemmas and propositions above are compiled as statements with proof pointers; no proof was reconstructed and no step was checked. The upper bound is the 1938 argument with its constants tracked (the site's maintainer says the same in the thread on 14 July 2026); the lower bound refines the 1938 construction, which used only the primes up to n1/3n^{1/3} and gave the constant 1/801/80.

Formal artifacts (read statically, not built)

  • Woett/Lean-files, the repository the thread comment of 14 July 2026 and the proof-claim of 5 August 2026 link: head of main 17d88dc1f122640d4a0101d1bcf04cb8682f7935 (committer date 2026-09-10T21:21:37Z, read 2026-09-18T05:57Z through the GitHub API; the file fetched at that commit 05:59Z). ErdosProblem793.lean (163,200 bytes, 2,209 lines; last changed at commit e80f01cb of 2026-08-05) declares itself a formalization of this manuscript's result obtained with an automated theorem prover, imports Mathlib, declares one axiom, pi_alt, the prime number theorem in the form π(⌊x⌋)=(1+c(x))x/log⁡x\pi(\lfloor x\rfloor)=(1+c(x))x/\log x with c=o(1)c=o(1) ("stated in the exact form it occurs in" an external Lean project on the prime number theorem, per the thread), defines Strongly2Primitive, F and S, and proves theorem main : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ((F n : ℝ) - Nat.primeCounting n) / ((n : ℝ) ^ ((2:ℝ)/3) / (Real.log n) ^ 2)) atTop (𝓝 (27/2)) through second_order_asymptotic_of_PNT; the file ends with #print axioms main and contains no sorry. A second file, ErdosProblem793General.lean (697,428 bytes), and a "blueprint" PDF in Woett/Miscellaneous (head 40f6aae3, 2026-08-05) concern the kk-fold generalization claimed on the proof-claim tab. The second file's header and its two self-contained corollaries, large_k_upper and large_k_lower, were read as text at its only commit e80f01cb (5 August 2026); the file declares the prime number theorem and a Delcourt--Postle matching theorem as axioms. The blueprint PDF remains unread.

Nothing was built, kernel-checked or audited here; the axiom the file declares is its own record, and no bridging statement between the file's F and the site's F(n)F(n) was checked beyond reading the definitions.

Bears on. #793: Theorem 1.1 is the problem's asymptotic with C=27/2C=27/2, the site's accepted resolution; displays (1) and (2) fix the convention (b=cb=c allowed) and the normalization S=n2/3/(log⁡n)2S=n^{2/3}/(\log n)^2. Proposition 2.4 is the upper bound F(n)≤π(n)+(27/2+o(1))SF(n)\le\pi(n)+(27/2+o(1))S and Proposition 3.4 the lower bound F(n)≥π(n)+(27/2−o(1))SF(n)\ge\pi(n)+(27/2-o(1))S; Lemmas 2.1--2.3 are the steps of the first and Lemmas 3.1--3.3 the steps of the second, none of which answers the problem by itself.

Results.

  • Theorem 1.1 (p. 1): as n→∞n\to\infty, F(n)=π(n)+(272+o(1)) n2/3/(log⁡n)2F(n)=\pi(n)+(\tfrac{27}{2}+o(1))\,n^{2/3}/(\log n)^2, where F(n)F(n) is the largest size of a strongly 2-primitive subset of [1,n][1,n].
  • Lemma 2.1 (Private factor, p. 2): if every member of a strongly 2-primitive AA is uvuv with u,v∈Bu,v\in B, then ∣A∣≤∣B∣|A|\le|B|.
  • Lemma 2.2 (Multiplicative basis, p. 2): every m≤nm\le n is a product of two members of B=B0∪B1∪B2∪B3B=B_0\cup B_1\cup B_2\cup B_3.
  • Lemma 2.3 (p. 2): ∑y<q≤n2/5π(n/q2)=(9+o(1))S\sum_{y<q\le n^{2/5}}\pi(n/q^2)=(9+o(1))S over primes qq.
  • Proposition 2.4 (p. 3): every strongly 2-primitive A⊆[1,n]A\subseteq[1,n] has ∣A∣≤π(n)+(27/2+o(1))S|A|\le\pi(n)+(27/2+o(1))S.
  • Lemma 3.1 (Linear triples, p. 3): for a linear family HH of triples of distinct primes with products at most nn, the unused primes up to nn and the triple products form a strongly 2-primitive set of size π(n)−∣V(H)∣+∣H∣\pi(n)-|V(H)|+|H|.
  • Lemma 3.2 (Cell weight, p. 4): the cell-weight series equals e−h+12e−2he^{-h}+\tfrac12e^{-2h} for every h>0h>0.
  • Lemma 3.3 (p. 5): HnH_n is linear and ∣Hn∣/M2|H_n|/M^2 tends to the limit (12).
  • Proposition 3.4 (p. 5): there are strongly 2-primitive A⊆[1,n]A\subseteq[1,n] with ∣A∣≥π(n)+(27/2−o(1))S|A|\ge\pi(n)+(27/2-o(1))S.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.