Source. Jaroslav Hančl and Robert Tijdeman, On the irrationality of
factorial series, Acta Arith. 118 (2005), 383--401; Theorem 4.1,
preprint p. 14, proof pp. 14--16; the Remarks on pp. 16 and 17;
Corollaries 4.1--4.3 and Example 4.1, pp. 16--17. Page numbers are those of
the preprint named on the
source card.
Statement
Let a>0 and b be integers with an+b=0 for every n∈N.
Suppose P(x)=∑i=0Taixi∈Z[x] and that
∑N=1∞P(N)/∏n=1N(an+b) is irrational (by
Theorem 3.1,
exactly when Q1=0). Let W be a set of functions
F:R+→R+ with the following properties.
(i) F(N+x)=∑r=0∞r!F(r)(N)xr for x=o(N) as
N→∞. (32)
(ii) F(r)(N)=O(Nrr!F(N)) uniformly for
r=0,1,… as N→∞. (33)
(iii) Either there is a positive integer K with
F(K)(x)=o(1),xK+1F(x)=o(∣F(K)(x)∣),x→∞limx2∣F(K)(x)∣=∞,(34)
or
K=0,x→∞limF(x)=0,x→∞limxF(x)=∞.(35)
(iv) For every pair F,G∈W with corresponding integers K>L,
limx→∞G(k)(x)/F(k)(x)=0 for k=0,1,…,K; for every
pair F,G∈W with F=G and corresponding integers K=L, either
limx→∞G(k)(x)/F(k)(x)=0 for k=0,1,…,K or
limx→∞F(k)(x)/G(k)(x)=0 for k=0,1,…,K.
Suppose that for every F∈W there is a function
f:N→Z such that
∑N=1∞f(N)/∏n=1N(an+b) is absolutely convergent
and f(N)=(aN+b)F(N)+O(1) as N→∞. Then the numbers
∑N=1∞f(N)/∏n=1N(an+b) (f ranging over these
functions, one for each F∈W),
∑N=1∞P(N)/∏n=1N(an+b) and 1 are linearly
independent over the rationals.
The printed statement writes the index set of the first family as
"(f∈W)"; the f are the integer sequences attached to the F∈W.
Remark (p. 16): by repeated use of l'Hôpital's rule, condition (iv) can be
relaxed: if limx→∞F(K)(x)/G(K)(x)=0 and
limx→∞G(K−1)(x)=∞, then
limx→∞F(k)(x)/G(k)(x)=0 for k=0,1,…,K. Remark
(p. 17): conditions (i)--(iii) hold for γxα
(α>−1, α∈/Z, γ∈R+) with
K=[α]+1; for γeβ(logx)α (0<α<1,
β,γ∈R+) with K=1; and for γ(logx)α
and γ(loglogx)α (α=0, γ∈R+)
with K=1 if α>0 and K=0 if α<0.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the Remarks were read
clause by clause on the rendered pages; the proof was read for structure
only. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
pp. 14--16: a rational relation is reduced with Lemma 3.1 to an integer
sequence of tails, ordered by (iv) so that one function FM dominates;
if limsupN∣FM(K)(N)∣=∞ the argument ends as in
Theorem 3.4,
and otherwise as in
Theorem 3.5.
Consequences on pp. 16--17
- Corollary 4.1:
1, e and all ∑[nα]/n! with α∈R+,
α∈/Z.
- Corollary 4.2 (p. 16): let α1,…,αM be positive reals
and P1,…,PM nonzero polynomials with integer coefficients such
that the numbers αmdegPm are distinct and nonintegral. Then
1, e and ∑N≥1[NαmPm(N)]/N! (m=1,…,M) are
linearly independent over the rationals.
- Corollary 4.3 (p. 17): 1 and the numbers
∑n≥1[n(logn)α]/n! (α∈R) are linearly
independent over the rationals.
- Example 4.1 (p. 17): 1, ∑[(logn)1/2]/n! and
∑[e(logn)1/2]/n! are linearly independent over the
rationals.
Bears on. No catalog problem directly.