Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Hancl 2005 irrationality factorial series
corollary_3_1: States that the sum of P(N) over N factorial, for an integer polynomial P, is rational exactly when the coefficients of P weighted by Bell numbers sum to zero, and is irrational when the leading coefficient is positive and the others nonnegative.
corollary_3_4: States that for a real polynomial P with nonnegative coefficients and positive leading coefficient the sum of the integer part of P(N) over N factorial is irrational.
corollary_3_5: States that for every real alpha at least zero and every positive real gamma the sum over N of the integer part of gamma N to the alpha divided by N factorial is irrational.
corollary_4_1: States that the numbers 1, e and the sums over n of the integer part of n to the alpha divided by n factorial, for all positive non-integral real alpha, are linearly independent over the rationals.
theorem_3_1: States that for an integer polynomial P the sum of P(N) over the product of an plus b for n up to N is rational exactly when an explicit finite Stirling-type sum of the coefficients of P vanishes.
theorem_3_2: States that if an integer sequence f(N) equals a rational polynomial P(N) plus o(N) and the sum of f(N) over the products of an plus b is rational, then f(N) equals P(N) minus the constant Q_1 of Lemma 3.1.
theorem_3_3: States that if an integer sequence f(N) equals (aN+b)P(N)+O(1) for a real polynomial P and the sum of f(N) over the products of an plus b is rational, then every coefficient of P is rational.
theorem_3_4: States that the sum of f(N) over the products of an plus b is irrational when f(N) equals (aN+b)F(N)+O(1) for a positive function F whose derivatives up to order K satisfy the Taylor, size and limit conditions (18) to (21).
theorem_3_5: States that the sum of f(N) over the products of an plus b is irrational when f(N) equals (aN+b)F(N)+O(1) for a positive function F with K at least one satisfying the Taylor expansion, uniform derivative bound and limit conditions (22) to (25).
theorem_4_1: States that 1, an irrational sum of P(N) over the products of an plus b, and the sums of f(N) over those products for f(N) equal to (aN+b)F(N)+O(1) with F ranging over a family W of smooth functions with separated growth are linearly independent over the rationals.
Jaroslav Hančl and Robert Tijdeman, On the irrationality of factorial series, Acta Arith. 118 (2005), no. 4, 383--401; doi:10.4064/aa118-4-5; Zbl 1088.11054; MSC 11J72.
Edition read
The copy read for this card is the author-page PostScript preprint hanti3.ps
(dvips 5.92b, 2002, Type 1 fonts), fetched from
https://pub.math.leidenuniv.nl/~tijdemanr/hanti3.ps on 2026-09-17
(UTC), 341,997 bytes, and rendered to PDF with ps2pdf (Ghostscript 10.07.1);
the rendering, not a separately fetched edition, has 18 pages. Its title page
reads "On the
irrationality of factorial series, Jaroslav Hančl and Robert Tijdeman", with the
grant note and the MSC. Page numbers and labels below are the preprint's; the
journal version (Acta Arithmetica, IMPAN) was not fetched and may differ. The
text layer is reliable for prose; the statements were checked on the rendered
pages 1--3 and 6--17. The preprint carries no document copyright or license line
(its only copyright strings are the embedded AMS font programs' notices, which
concern the fonts, not the text), and the author's page it was fetched from
(https://pub.math.leidenuniv.nl/~tijdemanr/, read 2026-10-02) states no
copyright, license or terms; the term is unstated. The PDF rendering of the
preprint, the authors' text rather than the journal edition, prints no copyright
or license line on any page; the same author page states no terms, and the
journal's record speaks for the publisher's edition, not this preprint; the term
is unstated.
Contents
Notation (p. 3): and integers with for all ; (1), with the case , ; Lemma 2.1: if then for all ; Lemma 2.2 (Oppenheim, Theorem 8): if for and , then exactly when vanishes for every ; Lemma 2.3: the Stirling numbers of the second kind , with for , and for .
- Theorem 3.1 (p. 8): for , is rational if and only if an explicit finite sum of the coefficients of vanishes (formula (17)).
- Corollary 3.1 (p. 8): is rational if and only if ; if the leading coefficient is positive and the others nonnegative, the sum is irrational.
- Theorem 3.2 (p. 8): for integer numerators with , a rational sum forces (printed "for all "; the proof gives all large ).
- Theorem 3.3 (p. 9): numerators with give a rational sum only if every coefficient of is rational; hence Corollary 3.4 (p. 10), for real with nonnegative coefficients and positive leading coefficient.
- Theorem 3.4 (p. 10) and Theorem 3.5 (pp. 11--12): integer numerators with positive and smooth, under the derivative conditions (18)--(21) and (22)--(25) respectively, give an irrational sum whenever it converges absolutely. Corollaries 3.5--3.8 (pp. 11--13) give, for instance, Corollary 3.5, for , , and the series and named on p. 2.
- Section 4 (pp. 14--17): Theorem 4.1 (p. 14) proves linear independence over the rationals of , an irrational polynomial series and series with smooth numerators from a family of separated growth; for example Corollary 4.1 (p. 16): , and the numbers for all together (the introduction, p. 2, states it so).
The paper on the prime power factorial series and on problem 252
The introduction (p. 2) places the paper's results as generalizations of Erdős's theorem [3] that , with the primes in increasing order, and records Erdős's claim that is irrational for every , adding "but unfortunately he proved only the case ". The same page surveys the divisor-function series: Oppenheim [12] proved that , and are irrational for every choice of signs , where , and are the number of divisors, the sum of divisors and Euler's function of ; a special case is due to Erdős and Kac [4]; and Erdős and Straus [5] proved that , , and are linearly independent over whenever for all large and for infinitely many . The paper notes that most of the results it mentions were stated more generally in the original papers. Reference [3] is Erdős 1958, [4] is Erdős–Kac, Problem 4518, Amer. Math. Monthly 61 (1954), and [5] is Erdős–Straus 1974.
The paper's theorems take numerators that are polynomials, within of a polynomial, or of the form with smooth of polynomial growth (p. 2). Neither nor is given in any of these forms, and the paper applies no result to them, so no result here bears directly on or on for .
Compiled scope
Statements read on the rendered pages; Theorem 3.1 and Corollary 3.1 with their one-line proofs read in full; Theorems 3.2--3.5 and 4.1 and the corollaries with result pages read clause by clause as statements, their proofs for structure only. No proof is rewritten and none has been independently reviewed.
Bears on. #252 (context: the exact rationality test for factorial series with polynomial numerators, Corollary 3.1, which does not reach , and the p. 2 survey of what is known for ), #251 (mention: the p. 2 record that Erdős proved the factorial theorem cited on the problem page for only).
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.