Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Postelmans 2007 irrationality zeta q 1 zeta q 2

../

theorem_1_1: States that for q the reciprocal of an integer p at least 2 the explicit integers alpha_n, beta_n give nonzero forms beta_n zeta_q(1) - alpha_n whose n^2-th roots tend to at most p^(-3(pi^2-4)/pi^2), so zeta_q(1) is irrational.

theorem_1_2: States that for q the reciprocal of an integer p at least 2 the explicit integers a_n, b_n give nonzero forms b_n zeta_q(2) - a_n whose n^2-th roots tend to at most p^(-3(pi^2-8)/pi^2), so zeta_q(2) is irrational.

theorem_1_3: States that for q the reciprocal of an integer at least 2 the numbers 1, zeta_q(1) and zeta_q(2) are linearly independent over the rationals; at 1/q = 2 the last number is the divisor-sum series of problem 250.


K. Postelmans and W. Van Assche, Irrationality of ζ_q(1) and ζ_q(2), J. Number Theory 126 (2007), no. 1, 119--154, DOI 10.1016/j.jnt.2006.11.011; Zbl 1138.11027 (reviewer W. Zudilin); arXiv:math/0604312.

The copy read for this card is arXiv:math/0604312v1 (stamped 13 April 2006; 34 pages; footer "Preprint submitted to J. Number Theory"), with a text layer; the theorems were also checked on the page images. Provenance: fetched from https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0604312 on 2026-09-17 (UTC), 292,893 bytes. The journal version was not compared; result labels and pages below are those of the arXiv version. The arXiv record carries no license field, so arXiv's assumed license applies (arXiv:math/0604312), every other right reserved.

Contents

The qq-zeta values are ζq(s)=∑n≥1ns−1qn/(1−qn)\zeta_q(s)=\sum_{n\ge1}n^{s-1}q^n/(1-q^n) for ∣q∣<1|q|<1 and s=1,2,…s=1,2,\ldots (1.1), with lim⁡q→1(1−q)sζq(s)=(s−1)! ζ(s)\lim_{q\to1}(1-q)^s\zeta_q(s)=(s-1)!\,\zeta(s) for s≥2s\ge2 (1.2). The introduction (p. 2) records: ζq(1)\zeta_q(1) irrational for q=1/pq=1/p, p>1p>1 an integer; "Results of Nesterenko [12] show that ζq(2)\zeta_q(2) is transcendental for every algebraic number qq with 0<∣q∣<10<|q|<1. Zudilin gave an upper bound for the measure of irrationality of ζq(2)\zeta_q(2) [22] with 1/q∈{2,3,4,… }1/q\in\{2,3,4,\dots\}"; Krattenthaler, Rivoal and Zudilin [11] on ζq(2n)\zeta_q(2n) and ζq(2n+1)\zeta_q(2n+1). Standing convention from p. 2 on: "we only use values of qq for which p=1/q∈N∖{0,1}p=1/q\in\mathbb N\setminus\{0,1\}".

  • Theorem 1.1 (p. 2; proof pp. 15--17): for q=1/pq=1/p, p>1p>1 an integer, integers αn,βn\alpha_n,\beta_n given by (4.3)--(4.4) satisfy βnζq(1)−αn≠0\beta_n\zeta_q(1)-\alpha_n\ne0 and lim⁡∣βnζq(1)−αn∣1/n2≤p−3(π2−4)/π2<1\lim|\beta_n\zeta_q(1)-\alpha_n|^{1/n^2}\le p^{-3(\pi^2-4)/\pi^2}<1. (The printed statement has βnζq(2)−αn≠0\beta_n\zeta_q(2)-\alpha_n\ne0, a misprint for ζq(1)\zeta_q(1), as the displayed limit and section 4 show.)
  • Theorem 1.2 (p. 2; proof pp. 23--28): integers an,bna_n,b_n given by (5.2)--(5.3) satisfy bnζq(2)−an≠0b_n\zeta_q(2)-a_n\ne0 and lim⁡∣bnζq(2)−an∣1/n2≤p−3(π2−8)/π2<1\lim|b_n\zeta_q(2)-a_n|^{1/n^2}\le p^{-3(\pi^2-8)/\pi^2}<1. With Lemma 1.1 (p. 3) this gives the irrationality of ζq(2)\zeta_q(2), with the measure bound 3π2/(π2−8)≈15.83693\pi^2/(\pi^2-8)\approx15.8369 (p. 29; quoted on p. 3), weaker than Zudilin's 4.07869374…4.07869374\ldots; for ζq(1)\zeta_q(1) the analogous bound is 3π2/(π2−4)≈5.044433\pi^2/(\pi^2-4)\approx5.04443 (p. 19).
  • Theorem 1.3 (p. 3; proof in section 6, pp. 29--33): the numbers 11, ζq(1)\zeta_q(1) and ζq(2)\zeta_q(2) are linearly independent over Q\mathbb Q. The tool is Lemma 1.2 (p. 3), a linear independence criterion from simultaneous approximations with a common denominator.
  • Sections 2--5: Hermite--Padé approximation to two Markov functions, multiple little qq-Jacobi polynomials (Theorems 5.1 and 5.2), and the asymptotics of the approximants.

Compiled scope

Theorems 1.1--1.3 were read on the page images and are compiled as statements with proof pointers (Theorem 1.1, Theorem 1.2, Theorem 1.3), with the definitions of the approximants and the measure bounds; read status claims checked, the proofs not checked. Lemmas 1.1 and 1.2 are stated on the pages that use them. Relied on as a refereed publication; it is a later independent proof of the irrationality of the number of Problem 250.

Bears on. #250: Theorem 1.3 at p=2p=2 gives the irrationality of ζ1/2(2)=∑n≥1σ(n)/2n\zeta_{1/2}(2)=\sum_{n\ge1}\sigma(n)/2^n as part of a linear independence statement, and Theorem 1.2 with Lemma 1.1 gives it alone; section 5.4 derives from Theorem 1.2 an irrationality measure bound. #257: Theorem 1.1 with Lemma 1.1 at p=2p=2 gives the irrationality of ζ1/2(1)=∑n≥11/(2n−1)\zeta_{1/2}(1)=\sum_{n\ge1}1/(2^n-1), the problem's sum for A=NA=\mathbb N only, a case Erdős settled in 1948.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.