Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Stoll 2005 families nonlinear recurrences related digits
theorem_1_1: Rabinowitz and Gilbert's 1991 theorem as Stoll restates it in 2005: for every positive real w, a two-step floor recurrence with multipliers a and 2/a and both shifts 1/2 whose differences u_{2n+1} - 2u_{2n-1} are the binary digits of w; at w = sqrt 2 it is the Graham-Pollak recurrence.
theorem_1_2: Stoll's 2005 theorem giving, for every positive real w and every integer j at least 1, two floor recurrences of the Graham-Pollak type (Cases I and II) whose differences u_{2n+1} - 2u_{2n-1} are the binary digits of w; the case w = sqrt 2, j = 1, epsilon = 1/2 of Case I is the Graham-Pollak recurrence.
theorem_1_3: Stoll's 2005 theorem giving, for every positive real w and every integer base g at least 2, a floor recurrence of the Graham-Pollak type whose differences u_{2n+1} - g u_{2n-1} are the digits of w in base g; the paper's answer to Rabinowitz and Gilbert's question about ternary digits.
Th. Stoll, On families of nonlinear recurrences related to digits, J. Integer Seq. 8 (2005), Article 05.3.2, 8 pp. Received 1 April 2005, revised version received 12 May 2005, published 24 May 2005 (the dates printed on p. 8). The site's key St05.
The copy read for this card is the journal's PDF, 8 pages whose printed page numbers equal the PDF page numbers. Its text layer garbles the formulas (floor brackets, exponents and radicals), so the statements below were read on the rendered page images of pp. 2--4; the proofs (pp. 4--7) were read in the text layer for their structure. Source: https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/journals/JIS/VOL8/Stoll/stoll56.html. No notice is printed in that PDF, and the journal's article page shows no copyright or license statement (https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/journals/JIS/VOL8/Stoll/stoll56.html, read 2026-10-02); the term is unstated.
Read status: claims checked for Fact 1, Theorem 1.1 (Rabinowitz and Gilbert's family, as the paper restates it), Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 and Corollaries 1.1 and 1.2, read clause by clause on the page images of pp. 2--4; the inductive proofs of Section 2 were read for structure and not checked.
Contents
- Introduction (pp. 1--4). The Hwang--Lin sequence $1,2,3,4,6,9,13,19,27, 38,54,77,109,\ldots$ is defined by , (1), which the paper rewrites as (2). Fact 1 (Graham and Pollak, p. 2): is the th digit in the binary expansion of . OEIS A001521 (), A091522 () and A091523 () are named. The paper reports (p. 2), citing Erdős and Graham at "[2, p. 96]", that they expected similar results "for and other algebraic numbers" but had "no idea what they are", and that Rabinowitz and Gilbert answered in the binary case by a computational guessing approach. Theorem 1.1 (Rabinowitz and Gilbert, Math. Mag. 64 (1991), 168--171, as restated, p. 2): for , with , and , the sequence , for odd and for even has equal to the th binary digit of ; for , .
- Theorem 1.2 (p. 3): for , , and any integer , with , (Case I) or , (Case II), the sequence , for odd and for even , with in Case I and in Case II, has equal to the th binary digit of .
- Theorem 1.3 (p. 3): for and an integer , with , and , the sequence , for odd and for even , with , has equal to the th digit of in base .
- Corollary 1.1 (p. 4): with for and , the recurrence , (odd ), (even ) gives the binary digits of ; is excluded ( and ). Corollary 1.2 (p. 4): with and and the shift on both steps, is the th ternary digit of (the case , , of Theorem 1.3).
- Section 2, Proofs (pp. 4--7). Proposition 2: for with and no tail of digits , with and . Theorem 1.2 is proved by induction on closed forms for and (Case I: , ), and Theorem 1.3 by the closed forms , ; the paper notes that in Case II the shift cannot be replaced by any other value.
- The acknowledgment (p. 7) thanks the referee "for pointing out several inaccuracies in the statement of the results" of the original manuscript; the copy read is the published revised version.
Compiled scope
The whole article was read (pp. 1--4 on the page images, pp. 4--8 in the text layer). Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 are compiled as statements with proof pointers; no step of the proofs was checked and nothing here is independently reviewed.
Bears on. #482, whose first paragraph is the Graham--Pollak identity (Fact 1 here) and whose second asks for similar results for and other algebraic numbers; the site's commentary cites this paper and Stoll's 2006 paper. Theorem 1.1 restates Rabinowitz and Gilbert's binary recurrence for every positive real ; Theorem 1.2 gives, for every positive real , two infinite families of recurrences of the Graham--Pollak shape whose differences are the binary digits of ; Theorem 1.3 gives, for every positive real and every integer base , one pair of multipliers , and a range of shifts giving such recurrences whose differences are the base- digits of . None of them classifies the recurrences with this property. Corollary 1.1 recovers Fact 1 as the case .
Results.
- Theorem 1.1 (p. 2): Rabinowitz and Gilbert's binary-digit recurrence for every , as the paper restates it.
- Theorem 1.2 (p. 3): two infinite families (Cases I and II, indexed by ) of binary-digit recurrences for every .
- Theorem 1.3 (p. 3): a -ary-digit recurrence for every and every integer .
- Corollaries 1.1 and 1.2 (p. 4): the specializations to in bases and .
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.