Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
A class of Littlewood polynomials that are not -flat
proposition_3_5: El Abdalaoui's proposition that a sequence of L2-normalized plus-or-minus-one polynomials that is L^alpha-flat for some alpha strictly between 0 and 2 has limiting frequency of the coefficient -1 in the closed interval from 1/4 to 3/4.
theorem_2_1: El Abdalaoui's theorem that a sequence of L2-normalized plus-or-minus-one polynomials whose limiting frequency of the coefficient -1 is not in the open interval (1/4, 3/4) is not L^alpha-flat for any alpha at least 0.
theorem_2_2: El Abdalaoui's theorem that a sequence of L2-normalized plus-or-minus-one polynomials whose limiting frequency of the coefficient -1 is not 1/2 has L^alpha norms tending to infinity, and so is not L^alpha-flat, for every alpha above 2.
theorem_2_3: El Abdalaoui's theorem that a sequence of L2-normalized plus-or-minus-one polynomials, each palindromic of even degree, is not L^alpha-flat for any alpha at least 0.
E. H. el Abdalaoui, M. G. Nadkarni, "A class of Littlewood polynomials that are not -flat," arXiv:1606.05852 (2016; v3, 2017). The paper is by el Abdalaoui; its appendix (Section 5) is written jointly with Nadkarni.
The copy read for this card is the arXiv text of arXiv:1606.05852v3 (10 May 2017), read in full; pages below are that PDF's own. Read status: claims checked for the definitions (pp. 4-6) and the statements of Theorems 2.1-2.3 (p. 7), Propositions 3.3 (p. 8) and 3.5 (p. 10), Theorem 3.6 (p. 10) and Theorem 4.1 (p. 11); their proofs were read for orientation but were not verified here. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1606.05852), every other right reserved.
Result pages: Theorem 2.1 (p. 7), Theorem 2.2 (p. 7), Theorem 2.3 (p. 7), Proposition 3.5 (p. 10).
Normalization
The paper writes an -normalized Littlewood polynomial as (2.1), p. 4,
and assumes (p. 5) that the limiting negative-coefficient frequency exists:
Thus is the number of coefficients and the degree is . For or , -flat means in ; for it means that the Mahler measures tend to (Section 2, "Flat polynomials", p. 6).
Coefficient-frequency obstructions
- Proposition 3.5 (p. 10). If is -flat for some , then .
- Theorem 2.2 (p. 7). If , then is not -flat for any , and . Its case is the Jensen--Jensen--Høholdt theorem, which the paper quotes as Theorem 3.6 (p. 10) and presents as following from Theorem 2.2. The paper adds (p. 11) that a sequence flat in Littlewood's sense has frequency of equal to .
- Theorem 2.1 (statement p. 7; proof on pp. 7-10 of Section 3, pp. 7-11, and the appendix written jointly with Nadkarni, Section 5, pp. 12-14). If , including either endpoint, then is not -flat for any . Proposition 3.3 (p. 8) supplies the closed-interval necessary condition for -flatness; the appendix treats the endpoint frequencies and .
Symmetry obstruction
Theorem 2.3 (statement p. 7; proof in Section 4, pp. 11-12). If every is palindromic and has even degree, then the sequence is not -flat for any . Here palindromic means, for a degree polynomial, for all (p. 4). The proof rewrites the polynomial as a cosine polynomial and invokes Littlewood's flatness criterion (Theorem 4.1, p. 11).
Scope for Problem 1150
These are restricted obstructions, not a solution of the unrestricted maximum-modulus problem. A sequence of polynomials with maxima at most has bounded normalized norms, so by Theorem 2.2 its frequency of tends to ; and, being -flat for finite , it has by Theorem 2.3 only finitely many even-degree palindromic members. The paper gives no universal constant for all Littlewood polynomials, no quantitative value of such a gap, and no obstruction for the remaining balanced, non-palindromic family (nor for odd-degree palindromic or other symmetry classes not named by Theorem 2.3).
In particular, these 2016 coefficient-frequency and symmetry theorems should not be conflated with el Abdalaoui's later [[polynomials/abdalaoui_2025_l_alpha_flatness_erdos_littlewood_s/_index|claimed unrestricted -flatness result]], whose claimed resolution its own card records as contradicted. That later claim does not enlarge the scope of the results extracted here.
Bears on.
- #1150: a restriction only. Theorems 2.2 and 2.3 confine any sequence with maxima at most to the balanced cases outside the even-degree palindromic class, as just described; the paper does not settle the problem.
- #228: a necessary condition only. By the remark after Theorem 2.2 (p. 11), a sequence flat in Littlewood's sense has frequency of equal to ; the paper does not address whether such sequences exist.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.