Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Cook 2021 universality minimum modulus random trigonometric polynomials

../


Nicholas A. Cook and Hoi H. Nguyen, Universality of the minimum modulus for random trigonometric polynomials, Discrete Analysis 2021:20, 46 pp.; DOI 10.19086/da.28985; arXiv:2101.07203. Received 5 February 2021, published 6 October 2021.

The retained folder-name PDF is the journal's copy: the arXiv posting stamped "arXiv:2101.07203v3 [math.PR] 5 Oct 2021" carrying the Discrete Analysis header, article number and DOI (46 pages, pdfTeX, clean text layer; the journal is an arXiv overlay, so this posting is the published version). Provenance: retained from the repository's survey download set of September 2026; the stamp identifies the file as https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.07203v3, and the download itself was not recorded; 543,836 bytes. Earlier arXiv versions were not compared. The arXiv record (https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.07203, read 2026-10-02) names the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.

Reading depth is claims checked for Theorem 1.1, Theorem 1.2 and Corollary 1.5 (pp. 2--3), read clause by clause in the text layer together with the introduction's account of Littlewood's question and the earlier bounds (pp. 1--2). Sections 2--10 (pp. 7--40) were not read.

Contents

  • Setting (pp. 1--2): the Kac polynomial Fn(z)=∑j=0nξjzjF_n(z)=\sum_{j=0}^n\xi_jz^j with iid coefficients. By the paper's account, Littlewood ([Lit66]) asked, for Rademacher signs ξj=±1\xi_j=\pm1, whether min⁡∣z∣=1∣Fn(z)∣=o(1)\min_{|z|=1}|F_n(z)|=o(1), and Kashin [Kas87] answered affirmatively; Konyagin's 1994 introduction instead gives Littlewood's conjecture as min⁡<εn\min<\varepsilon\sqrt n with probability tending to one, which Kashin proved. Konyagin [Kon94] showed P(min⁡∣z∣=1∣Fn(z)∣≥n−1/2+ε)→0\mathbf P(\min_{|z|=1}|F_n(z)|\ge n^{-1/2+\varepsilon})\to0 for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 (1.2); Konyagin and Schlag [KS99] showed lim sup⁡nP(min⁡∣z∣=1∣Fn(z)∣≤εn−1/2)≤Cε\limsup_n\mathbf P(\min_{|z|=1}|F_n(z)|\le\varepsilon n^{-1/2})\le C\varepsilon (1.3). The paper works with the normalized series Pn(x)=(2n+1)−1/2∑j=−nnξje(jx)P_n(x)=(2n+1)^{-1/2}\sum_{j=-n}^n\xi_je(jx), which up to a unimodular factor is (2n+1)−1/2F2n(2n+1)^{-1/2}F_{2n} on the unit circle, and with mn=min⁡x∣Pn(x)∣m_n=\min_x|P_n(x)| (1.4)--(1.5).
  • Theorem 1.1 (p. 2, quoted from Yakir and Zeitouni [YZ]): for standard real or complex Gaussian ξ\xi and every τ>0\tau>0, lim⁡nP(mn>τ/n)=e−λτ\lim_n\mathbf P(m_n>\tau/n)=e^{-\lambda\tau} with λ=2π/3\lambda=2\sqrt{\pi/3} (1.6).
  • Theorem 1.2, the main result (p. 3): if ξ\xi is a centered sub-Gaussian variable of unit variance, real-valued or of the form 2−1/2(ξ′+−1 ξ′′)2^{-1/2}(\xi'+\sqrt{-1}\,\xi'') with iid real ξ′,ξ′′\xi',\xi'', then for every τ>0\tau>0, P(mn>τ/n)−PNR(0,1)(mn>τ/n)→0\mathbf P(m_n>\tau/n)-\mathbf P_{N_{\mathbb R}(0,1)}(m_n>\tau/n)\to0 (1.8). Remark 1.4 asserts, without proof, that a finite moment of sufficiently large order would suffice in place of sub-Gaussianity.
  • Corollary 1.5 (p. 3): the limit (1.6) holds for every sub-Gaussian ξ\xi of mean zero and unit variance, in particular for Rademacher polynomials.
  • Method (pp. 5--6, read for the plan only): the joint distribution of small values of PnP_n at mm fixed points is related to a random walk in a 4m4m-dimensional phase space, with small-ball estimates and a local central limit theorem under Diophantine conditions on the angles.

Compiled scope

The introduction and the statements of Section 1 were read; the proofs (Sections 2--10), the extensions of Section 10 and the bibliography were not read beyond a search for the cited works. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #525, as the sharpest known answer to its second question: by Corollary 1.5, for ±1\pm1 coefficients and degree 2n2n the minimum modulus is (2n+1)1/2mn(2n+1)^{1/2}m_n with n mnn\,m_n converging in law to an exponential distribution of rate λ\lambda, so m(f)m(f) is of order (deg⁡f)−1/2(\deg f)^{-1/2} for typical ff, and m(f)<1m(f)<1 for all but o(22n)o(2^{2n}) sign choices, which answers the first question in even degree. The introduction (p. 2) states Littlewood's question as min⁡∣z∣=1∣Fn(z)∣=o(1)\min_{|z|=1}|F_n(z)|=o(1) and credits Kashin with its affirmative answer; Konyagin's 1994 introduction (p. 80) gives Kashin's theorem as the bound n1/2(log⁡n)−1/3n^{1/2}(\log n)^{-1/3}, which settles neither question (konyagin_1994_minimum_modulus_random_trigonometric_polynomials_coefficients). The printed rate λ=2π/3\lambda=2\sqrt{\pi/3} (Theorem 1.1, quoted from Yakir and Zeitouni, and Corollary 1.5) is twice the constant that the formal-conjectures and lean-proofs statements of the problem give, π/12\sqrt{\pi/12} in the degree normalization, i.e. λ=π/3\lambda=\sqrt{\pi/3}; the discrepancy is unresolved.