Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

On an Erdős Problem about the Maximum Modulus of Littlewood Polynomials on the Unit Circle

../


Tamás Erdélyi, On an Erdős Problem about the Maximum Modulus of Littlewood Polynomials on the Unit Circle, arXiv:2608.00744v1 (2026), dated May 12, 2026 on its title page.

The copy read for this card is arXiv:2608.00744v1. The folder holds its PDF and a Markdown reading copy; Theorem 2.1 was checked against the PDF's p. 3. The arXiv record (https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00744, read 2026-10-02) names the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.

Reading depth is claims checked for the definition of LnL_n in Section 1 and Theorem 2.1 in Section 2. Its proof in Section 4 was read for the argument's structure and displayed estimates, but the cited Bernstein inequalities were not checked against their original sources and the proof is not independently verified here.

Main result

The paper uses degree normalization, not coefficient-count normalization:

Ln={Pn(z)=∑k=0nakzk:ak∈{−1,1}}.L_n=\left\{P_n(z)=\sum_{k=0}^{n}a_kz^k:a_k\in\{-1,1\}\right\}.

Thus PnP_n has exactly n+1n+1 coefficients and Parseval gives 12π∫02π∣Pn(eit)∣2 dt=n+1\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}|P_n(e^{it})|^2\,dt=n+1. With this convention, Theorem 2.1 states exactly that every Pn∈LnP_n\in L_n satisfies

max⁡t∈R∣Pn(eit)∣2≥n+1+138n1/3.\max_{t\in\mathbb R}|P_n(e^{it})|^2 \ge n+1+\frac{1}{38}n^{1/3}.

The statement is Theorem 2.1 in Section 2; its proof is in Section 4 under "Proof of Theorem 2.1," equations (4.1)--(4.15), using Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2. The proof sets Tn(t)=∣Pn(eit)∣2−(n+1)T_n(t)=|P_n(e^{it})|^2-(n+1). Parity of the autocorrelation coefficients and Parseval give the derivative-energy lower bound (4.2). Assuming an upper excess δn\delta_n, the L1L_1 Bernstein inequality gives (4.7); the dyadic level-set decomposition (4.8)--(4.11), combined with the Bernstein--Szegő pointwise estimate (4.12)--(4.15), gives an incompatible upper bound when δn=138n1/3\delta_n=\frac1{38}n^{1/3}.

This is an additive n1/3/38n^{1/3}/38 gain over the mean squared modulus n+1n+1. After taking square roots and comparing with E1150's n\sqrt n scale, it says

max⁡∣z∣=1∣Pn(z)∣n≥(1+1n+138n−2/3)1/2,\frac{\max_{|z|=1}|P_n(z)|}{\sqrt n} \ge \left(1+\frac1n+\frac1{38}n^{-2/3}\right)^{1/2},

whose right-hand side tends to 11. A fixed factor (1+c)n(1+c)\sqrt n with c>0c>0 would require a squared-modulus excess of order nn, whereas the theorem supplies only order n1/3n^{1/3}. It is therefore quantitative progress beyond Parseval, but remains far short of the fixed multiplicative gap asked for in E1150.

Bears on. #1150, by giving the universal n1/3/38n^{1/3}/38 additive squared-modulus gain while leaving the requested fixed factor unresolved.