Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Erdos 1956 number real roots random algebraic equation

../

theorem: Erdős and Offord's main theorem: for all but a proportion o((log log n)^{-1/2}) of the equations 1 + ε_1 x + ... + ε_n x^n = 0 with signs ε_ν = ±1, the number of real roots is (2/π) log n + o((log n)^{1/2} log(log n)).


P. Erdős, A. C. Offord: On the number of real roots of a random algebraic equation, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 6 (1956), 139--160; MR 17,500f; Zentralblatt 70,17. No copyright or license line is printed on pp. 139--140 or 159--160 of the scan; the Wiley Online Library page for the article could not be read on 2026-10-02, and the London Mathematical Society's journal page, which names Wiley as the publisher handling rights and permissions, describes the journals as hybrid open access with no blanket license and carries the footer "© Copyright London Mathematical Society 2026" (https://www.lms.ac.uk/publications/jlms, read 2026-10-02), every other right reserved.

The paper has one main result, the unnumbered Theorem on p. 139 (result page theorem). It says that for the 2^n equations f_n(x) = 1 + eps_1 x + ... + eps_n x^n = 0 with each eps_v = +-1 (the family (1.1), p. 139), the number of real roots of all but a proportion o((log log n)^{-1/2}) of them is (2/pi) log n + o((log n)^{1/2} log(log n)) (display (1.2)). The authors present it as a refinement of the estimates of Littlewood and Offord (Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 35 (1939)). Section 1 (pp. 139--140) states the theorem and reduces the count to the interval (1/2, 1): every root lies in 1/2 < |x| < 2, roots in (1/2, 1) correspond to roots of f_n(-x) in (-1, -1/2), and a root in (1, 2) to a root of x^n f_n(1/x) in (1/2, 1), so it suffices to show that the number of roots in (1/2, 1) is (1/(2 pi)) log n plus the error term. Section 2 (pp. 140--145) compares the zeros of f(x,t) = sum_0^n r_v(t) x^v, with r_v the Rademacher functions, on an interval [alpha, beta] with the sign changes at its end-points: under the standing assumptions 1/2 <= alpha < beta <= 1 and gamma = (beta - alpha) min{n, (1-beta)^{-1}} < 1 (p. 141), Lemma 4 (p. 144) bounds the average over t of N(t) - N*(t), the number of zeros (endpoint zeros counted with half their multiplicity) less the sign-change indicator, by C gamma^2 (log(1/gamma))^{1/2} with C an absolute constant, and Lemma 5 (p. 145) sums this over a partition of [1/2, 1]. Section 3 (pp. 145--151) computes the probability of a sign change between two points (Lemma 12, p. 151), section 4 (pp. 151--157) the joint behaviour for two intervals (Lemmas 17 and 18, p. 156), and section 5 (pp. 157--160) fixes the partition step delta as a power of log n and assembles the mean and the variance of the number of sign changes. On p. 139 the authors also report the count by Dr. and Mrs. A. D. Booth of the real roots of the 256 equations 1 +- x +- x^2 ... +- x^8 = 0: 58 have none, 190 have two, 8 have four and none has more, an average of 1.609 (1.532 without the eight with four roots) against (2/pi) log 8 = 1.324, which they describe as some reasonable agreement, the observed counts appearing slightly above their estimate.

Read status: claims checked for the family (1.1) and the Theorem (p. 139), the reduction of section 1 (p. 140) and the statement of Lemma 4 with its standing assumptions (pp. 140--141, 144), each read clause by clause on the printed page; the proofs (pp. 140--160) were read for structure only, and nothing here is independently reviewed.

Source: https://users.renyi.hu/~p_erdos/1956-13.pdf.

Bears on. #521: the problem asks whether the number R_n of real roots of sum_{k<=n} eps_k z^k, for one infinite sequence of independent uniform signs, satisfies R_n/log n -> 2/pi almost surely. The Theorem (p. 139) gives, for each degree n, the count (2/pi) log n + o((log n)^{1/2} log log n) outside a proportion o((log log n)^{-1/2}) of the sign choices, so R_n/log n -> 2/pi in probability; it does not give the almost-sure limit. The problem fixes no constant coefficient, while (1.1) fixes it at 1; since f and -f have the same roots, the count is the same. The site also lists the paper among the references of Problem 522, on the roots in the closed unit disk; the paper counts real roots only and states nothing about that question.

Results.

  • Theorem (p. 139): for all but a proportion o((log log n)^{-1/2}) of the 2^n equations 1 + eps_1 x + ... + eps_n x^n = 0, eps_v = +-1, the number of real roots is (2/pi) log n + o((log n)^{1/2} log(log n)).

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.