Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
For a -partition (-coloring) of let be the set of integers with a monochromatic representation
(display (2), p. 47), let be the set of even integers in , and put , . Roth conjectured (display (3), p. 48) that there is an absolute constant such that for an arbitrary -partition; "(Note that if also is allowed, then this is trivial.)" The paper proves the conjecture "in a sharper and more general form".
Theorem 1 (p. 48). (i) For each there is a threshold such that every -partition of satisfies
(ii) Every -partition satisfies
(iii) Some -partition has for every (6).
The exponent in (4) is ; the proof (p. 50) applies Lemma 1 with . Statement (ii) says a -partition misses at most about of the even integers up to , the golden ratio, so the even monochromatic sums have full density; (iii) shows that infinitely many even integers can be missed.
Source. P. Erdős, A. Sárközy and V. T. Sós, On a conjecture of Roth and some related problems I, in Irregularities of Partitions (Springer, 1989), 47--59; Theorem 1 on printed p. 48 (PDF p. 2), Lemma 1 on p. 48, proof on pp. 49--51 (PDF pp. 3--5). The copy read is a scan whose text layer garbles formulas; the statements were read on the page images.
Read depth. Claims checked: Theorem 1 (i)--(iii), Lemma 1 and the definitions (pp. 47--48) were read clause by clause on the page images. The deduction of (i) from Lemma 1 (p. 50) and the proofs of (ii) and (iii) (p. 51) were read for structure; the proof of Lemma 1 (pp. 49--50) was not checked.
Proof sketch
Lemma 1 (p. 48), a density version of Hilbert's cube lemma: for and , every set with contains a -dimensional cube: a positive integer and pairwise distinct positive integers for which each of the sums () lies in .
(i) (p. 50). Suppose more than even integers not exceeding have no monochromatic representation, and let be their set. Lemma 1 with gives with all the sums in ; in particular is even, . The distinct integers fall into classes, so two of them, and with , share a class, and their sum is a monochromatic representation with distinct summands, contradicting the definition of .
(ii) (p. 51). Let be the even integers not exceeding without a monochromatic representation. If for some , the system , , has positive integer solutions, two of share a class, and one of the 's is a monochromatic sum; hence for every , which forces Fibonacci-type growth and proves (ii).
(iii) (p. 51). Define recursively: ; once is defined, put and, for , iff ; let . Then for every .
Dependencies
Lemma 1 of the paper (proved there on pp. 49--50, not checked here).
Bears on
- Problem 484: (i) gives for any fixed once is large in terms of and , the absolute constant the problem asks for; (ii) and (iii) are the site's remarks for .