Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 484

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 484, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Prove that there exists an absolute constant c>0c>0 such that, whenever {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} is kk-coloured (and NN is large enough depending on kk) then there are at least cNcN many integers in {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} which are representable as a monochromatic sum (that is, a+ba+b where $a,b\in {1,\ldots,N}$ are in the same colour class and a≠ba\neq b).

Formulation. The site's wording, accessed 2026-09-17 (page last edited 8 April 2026). The constant cc must not depend on kk; the threshold for NN may. Roth's conjecture as Erdős printed it in 1961 (p. 230) and 1980 (p. 112) does not write the condition a≠ba\ne b; Erdős, Sárközy and Sós make it explicit in their display (2) and note that without it the statement is trivial (every even n≤Nn\le N is n/2+n/2n/2+n/2). Their count CMC_M is exactly the site's: an integer n≤Mn\le M with n=a1+a2n=a_1+a_2, a1≠a2a_1\ne a_2, in one class of a kk-partition of N\mathbb{N} has a1,a2<n≤Ma_1,a_2<n\le M, and only the colors of {1,…,M}\{1,\ldots,M\} matter.

Status. PROVED (LEAN). Theorem 1(i) of Erdős, Sárközy and Sós (1989) gives, for every k≥2k\ge2 and every kk-partition, ∣CM2∣>M/2−3M1−2−k−1|C^2_M|>M/2-3M^{1-2^{-k-1}} for M>M0(k)M>M_0(k), where CM2C^2_M counts the even integers up to MM that are sums of two distinct integers of one class; so at least cMcM integers up to MM are monochromatic sums for any fixed c<12c<\tfrac12 once MM is large in terms of kk, which is the statement with the absolute constant cc. The source is a chapter of a Springer conference volume. The site's suffix (LEAN) is a catalog label whose scope is qualified under Existing formalization below, and no local kernel credit is claimed. The claim page Erdős, Sárközy and Sós 1989 (accepted on the site's crediting of the paper; the Lean 4 formalization of the result is a link on it, neither built nor checked here) records the result, its postings and its acceptance evidence, and the frontmatter standing derives from it.

Source. erdosproblems.com/484, accessed 2026-09-17: the problem page (labeled PROVED (LEAN), the site's gloss being that the problem is solved affirmatively and its proof checked in Lean; last edited 8 April 2026; source keys [Er61, p. 230] and [Er80, p. 112]; commentary citing [ESS89] and Problem 25 of Ben Green's open problems list), its discussion thread with one comment (15 April 2026) and its empty proof-claim tab. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #484, https://www.erdosproblems.com/484, accessed 2026-09-17.

References.

  • [Er61] Erdős, P., Some unsolved problems. Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Közl. 6 (1961), 221--254; item 16, p. 230. Library home: erdos_1961_unsolved_problems.
  • [Er80] Erdős, P., A survey of problems in combinatorial number theory. Ann. Discrete Math. 6 (1980), 89--115; p. 112. Library home: erdos_1980_survey_problems_combinatorial_number_theory.
  • [ESS89] Erdős, P., Sárközy, A. and Sós, V. T., On a conjecture of Roth and some related problems. I. Irregularities of Partitions, Springer (1989), 47--59, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61324-1_4. Library home: erdos_1989_conjecture_roth_related_problems.
  • [ESS90] Erdős, P., Sárközy, A. and Sós, V. T., On a conjecture of Roth and some related problems. II. Number Theory (Banff 1988), de Gruyter (1990), 125--138, doi:10.1515/9783110848632-013. Not held; the Crossref record identifies it as the sequel.

Formalization. Statement in ErdosProblems/484.lean of formal-conjectures (main), with an external proof tag pointing at a Lean 4 file in another collection at a fixed commit; nothing was built or checked here. See Existing formalization.

Current assessment

The question. On 2026-09-17 the site states the problem as above, shows PROVED (LEAN), cites [Er61, p. 230] and [Er80, p. 112]. Its commentary attributes the conjecture to Roth and the solution to [ESS89], reports the paper's sharper count of at least N/2−O(N1−1/2k+1)N/2-O(N^{1-1/2^{k+1}}) even integers of this form, its two-color bound of N/2−O(log⁡N)N/2-O(\log N) even integers with the 22-coloring that keeps every power of 22 from being a monochromatic sum as the matching example, and points to Problem 25 of Ben Green's open problems list as a refinement. The one comment in the thread (15 April 2026) reports that Aristotle autoformalized a solution from the referenced paper, with the site's note that the page was updated to address it; the proof-claim tab is empty. The community database lists the problem as proved (Lean) as of its last update on 15 April 2026 and the statement as formalized with no formal-proof URL.

Origin. Item 16 of Erdős's 1961 survey (p. 230): "Roth conjectured that there exists an absolute constant cc so that to every kk there exists an n0=n0(k)n_0=n_0(k) which has the following property: Let n>n0n>n_0, split the integers not exceeding nn into kk classes {ai(j)}\{a_i^{(j)}\}, 1≤j≤k1\le j\le k. Then the number of distinct integers not exceeding nn which for some jj, 1≤j≤k1\le j\le k can be written in the form ai1(j)+ai2(j)a_{i_1}^{(j)}+a_{i_2}^{(j)} is greater than cncn." The 1980 survey restates it with small changes of wording and the same content (p. 112). Neither prints i1≠i2i_1\ne i_2; see Formulation.

Status-defining source. Erdős, Sárközy and Sós, Theorem 1 (printed p. 48 of the 1989 chapter). With CC the set of integers having a monochromatic representation n=a1+a2n=a_1+a_2, a1≠a2a_1\ne a_2, under a kk-partition of N\mathbb{N}, C2C^2 its even part and CMC_M, CM2C^2_M the parts up to MM (p. 47): (i) to every k≥2k\ge2 there exists M0(k)M_0(k) such that for an arbitrary kk-partition ∣CM2∣>M/2−3M1−2−k−1|C^2_M|>M/2-3M^{1-2^{-k-1}} if M>M0(k)M>M_0(k); (ii) for every 22-partition ∣CM2∣>M/2−(log⁡((1+5)/2))−1log⁡M|C^2_M|>M/2-(\log((1+\sqrt5)/2))^{-1}\log M; (iii) there is a 22-partition with 2n∉C22^n\notin C^2 for all nn. The authors introduce these as proving Roth's conjecture "in a sharper and more general form" (p. 48). The specialization to the problem is immediate: a kk-coloring of {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} extends arbitrarily to N\mathbb{N}, every element of CNC_N is a sum of two distinct integers of {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} of one color, and ∣CN∣≥∣CN2∣>N/2−3N1−2−k−1≥cN|C_N|\ge|C^2_N|>N/2-3N^{1-2^{-k-1}}\ge cN for any fixed c<12c<\tfrac12 once NN exceeds a threshold depending on kk. Acceptance evidence: the site's curator names the chapter as the solution; the chapter is part of a Springer conference volume published in 1989 (Crossref record of the DOI accessed), whose refereeing is not documented. Read depth: claims checked for Theorem 1, Lemma 1 and Theorem 2; the deduction of Theorem 1(i) from Lemma 1 (p. 50: Lemma 1 with d=k+1d=k+1 gives a (k+1)(k+1)-dimensional cube of even integers without monochromatic representation, and two of the k+1k+1 integers z+viz+v_i share a class, so their sum u+vi+vju+v_i+v_j is a monochromatic sum in the cube, a contradiction) and the proofs of (ii) and (iii) (p. 51) were read for structure; the proof of Lemma 1 (pp. 49--50) was not checked.

Known results beyond the statement. Theorem 2 (p. 51): for k≤3k\le3 and M>CM>C, ∣CM∣≥[M/2]−1|C_M|\ge[M/2]-1; for k≥4k\ge4 there is a kk-partition with ∣CM∣<M/2−cklog⁡M|C_M|<M/2-ck\log M, cc an absolute constant, so the M/2−o(M)M/2-o(M) shape of Theorem 1(i) cannot become M/2−O(1)M/2-O(1) for every kk. Theorem 4 (p. 55, statement only): if every class contains both even and odd integers then ∣CM∣>(12+12k−ε)M|C_M|>(\tfrac12+\tfrac1{2k}-\varepsilon)M for M>M0(ε,k)M>M_0(\varepsilon,k), and some such partition has ∣CM∣<(12+1k)M+1|C_M|<(\tfrac12+\tfrac1k)M+1, so the barrier 12\tfrac12 in Theorem 1 comes from parity-pure classes (the odd and even numbers give ∣CM∣≈∣CM2∣|C_M|\approx|C^2_M|, p. 51). Theorem 5 (p. 56, statement only): for the representation n=∣ra1+sa2∣n=|ra_1+sa_2| with r,s≠0r,s\ne0, r+s≠0r+s\ne0, ∣r+s∣=m|r+s|=m, every kk-partition gives ∣CM∣≥(1−ε)M/m|C_M|\ge(1-\varepsilon)M/m, sharp by the congruence partition mod mm, while for differences a1−a2a_1-a_2 the density can tend to 00. Theorem 3 of the same paper (squares as monochromatic sums) concerns Problem 439. The site's pointer to Problem 25 of Ben Green's open problems list (a refinement) and the sequel [ESS90] are not compiled here.

Existing formalization and the Lean label. The formal-conjectures file ErdosProblems/484.lean (main) declares

erdos_484 : ∃ c : ℝ, 0 < c ∧ ∀ k : ℕ, 0 < k → ∃ N₀ : ℕ, ∀ N : ℕ, N₀ ≤ N → ∀ f : ℕ → Fin k, c * N ≤ (((Finset.Icc 1 N).filter fun n => ∃ a ∈ Finset.Icc 1 N, ∃ b ∈ Finset.Icc 1 N, a ≠ b ∧ f a = f b ∧ a + b = n).card : ℝ)

under category research solved, with proof sorry and the attribute formal_proof using lean4 at the file src/v4.29.1/ErdosProblems/Erdos484.lean of the collection plby/lean-proofs at a pinned commit of 30 June 2026 (linked on the claim page). The statement counts the n∈{1,…,N}n\in\{1,\ldots,N\} that are a+ba+b with a≠ba\ne b in {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} of one color, the site's statement, with k≥1k\ge1 (the case k=1k=1 is trivial). The external file (22,450 bytes; header leanprover/lean4:v4.29.1 mathlib v4.29.1) names Erdős, Sárközy and Sós as informal authors and Aristotle and Tomaz Mascarenhas as formal authors, links the site's discussion thread, imports Mathlib, defines monochromaticSumSet N k f as that filtered set, proves a density Hilbert cube lemma (density_hilbert) and a pigeonhole contradiction along the lines of the paper's proof, and ends with

monochromatic_sums_linear : ∃ c : ℝ, c > 0 ∧ ∀ k : ℕ, k ≥ 1 → ∃ N₀ : ℕ, ∀ N : ℕ, N ≥ N₀ → ∀ f : ℕ → Fin k, (monochromaticSumSet N k f).card ≥ ⌊c * (N : ℝ)⌋₊

with c=1/8c=1/8, without sorry or any declared axiom, followed by a comment recording #print axioms as propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound. Aristotle is an automated prover; its authorship is recorded as provenance, and no independent check of the file is claimed. Nothing was built, audited or kernel-checked here; the site's "(LEAN)" suffix is a catalog label, the community database records no formal-proof URL, and the statements above are the only formal content inspected.

Search scope. The problem, discussion and proof-claim pages; the community database record; the formal-conjectures file at the pinned commit and the external Lean file it names; the Crossref records of [ESS89] and [ESS90]; the Semantic Scholar search endpoint for the paper's title (HTTP 429 on two attempts, so no citation list was obtained); arXiv API searches for "monochromatic sum" or "monochromatic sums" in abstracts (one record, on Ramsey complete sequences); and the primary sources [ESS89] (pp. 47--48, 50--51 and 55--56), [Er61] (p. 230) and [Er80] (p. 112). Not searched: MathSciNet, zbMATH, Google Scholar, X. Nothing found disputes the theorem or changes the status.

Remaining gaps. (1) The proof of Lemma 1 and the proofs of Theorem 2 are not compiled; Theorems 4 and 5 are recorded as statements. (2) The sequel [ESS90] and Green's Problem 25 are not held or compiled. (3) The Lean files are pointers, not local evidence. (4) The 1961 and 1980 statements omit a≠ba\ne b (Formulation).

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.