Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Erdos 1996 some my favourite problems cycles colourings

../


P. Erdős, Some of my favourite problems on cycles and colourings, Tatra Mt. Math. Publ. 9 (1996), 7--9. Received 8 September 1994. The site's key Er96.

Copy read. The journal's archive serves the paper as a dvips PostScript file, Full/09/01ERDOS.ps (dvips 5.58; the file's own creation stamp is 19 May 2005, when the archive was typeset from the journal's DVI). Provenance of that download: retrieved from https://tatra.mat.savba.sk/Full/09/01ERDOS.ps (HTTP 200, application/postscript, one request, reached from the archive's volume 9 listing and the paper's entry page, which prints the bibliographic record "Tatra Mt. Math. Publ. 9 (1996), 7--9"); 59,198 bytes. The copy read for this card is a PDF conversion of that PostScript with GPL Ghostscript 10.07.1 on 2026-09-18 (three letter-size pages, 112,426 bytes; identified by the PostScript's line above), with a text layer that drops accents and some symbols; every statement below was read on the rendered page images, where printed p. nn is PDF p. n−6n-6. Anyone re-deriving such a PDF from the archive's file should expect byte differences from Ghostscript's version and timestamps. The archive's listing spells the title "colorings"; the paper's head and the journal record spell it "colourings", kept here. No notice is printed in the archive's PostScript rendering (its three pages read in full in the text layer), the journal's archive site states no copyright, license or terms (https://tatra.mat.savba.sk/, read 2026-10-02), and volume 9 is not among the volumes (42 to 91) hosted on Sciendo; the term is unstated.

Read status: claims checked for items 5 and 6, read clause by clause on the page images of printed pp. 8--9, and for the passages of items 3 and 4 quoted under Bears on (pp. 7--8, page images); the rest of items 1--4 was read for identification. The paper states problems and proves nothing.

Contents

The abstract is one sentence announcing six problems on graph cycles and colorings.

  • Item 1 (p. 7): if every mm-vertex subgraph of G(n)G(n) has an independent set of size at least m/2−km/2-k, kk fixed, is G(n)G(n) the union of a bipartite graph and a set of fewer than f(k)f(k) vertices? With the Erdős--Hajnal theorem that a graph of infinite chromatic number can have every mm-vertex subgraph containing an independent set of (1−ε)m/2(1-\varepsilon)m/2 vertices, and even m/2−f(m)m/2-f(m) with f(m)→∞f(m)\to\infty arbitrarily slowly.
  • Item 2 (p. 7): the Erdős--Hajnal--Szemerédi conjecture [2]: for $f(n)\to \infty$ arbitrarily slowly, is there a graph of infinite chromatic number every nn-vertex subgraph of which can be made bipartite by omitting at most f(n)f(n) edges? "I offer 250 dollars for a proof or disproof."
  • Item 3 (pp. 7--8): the Erdős--Hajnal conjecture that the cycle lengths n1<n2<⋯n_1<n_2<\cdots of a graph of infinite chromatic number satisfy ∑1/ni=∞\sum1/n_i=\infty, perhaps even lim‾⁡∑ni<x1/x=1/2\varlimsup\sum_{n_i<x}1/x=1/2 (display (1)); the Erdős--Mihók conjecture on cycles of length 2k2^k; the Erdős--Gyárfás question on graphs of minimum degree at least kk with no cycle of length a power of 22, the function f(n)f(n) for the least size forcing such a cycle with the conjecture f(n)/n→∞f(n)/n\to\infty, and the question whether a sequence of even numbers of density 00 forces a cycle in every G(n;cn)G(n;cn) (with [1], Bollobás's cycles modulo kk).
  • Item 4 (p. 8): with Faudree, the number f(n)f(n) of possible sequences of cycle lengths 3≤a1<⋯<ak≤n3\le a_1<\cdots<a_k\le n of nn-vertex graphs: $f(n)\le 2^{n-2}$ (strict for n≥5n\ge5), f(n)≥2n/2f(n)\ge2^{n/2}, "Probably $f(n)^{1/n}\to c$, 2≤c<2\sqrt2\le c<2", and the unproved f(n)/2n→0f(n)/2^n\to0, $f(n)/2^{n/2}\to \infty$.
  • Item 5 (p. 8): h(n)h(n) is defined as the largest integer such that some C4C_4-free graph G(n)G(n) has every vertex of degree at least h(n)h(n), and h(n)=(1+o(1))nh(n)=(1+o(1))\sqrt n is recalled as well known (display (3)). The questions: is h(m)≥h(n)h(m)\ge h(n) whenever m≥nm\ge n (display (4)); should (4) ask too much, whether some constant CC has h(m)>h(n)−Ch(m)>h(n)-C (display (5)); should (5) fail as well, find a function l(n)l(n), tending to infinity as slowly as possible, with h(m)>h(n)−l(n)h(m)>h(n)-l(n) for every m>nm>n. Then "Try to improve (3)": is h(n)=n1/2+O(1)h(n)=n^{1/2}+O(1) (display (6)), of which Erdős writes "Very likely (6) is too optimistic."
  • Item 6 (p. 9): the Erdős--Tuza questions [3]: for a graph GG with ee edges and large nn, color the edges of K(n)K(n) by ee colors so that at every vertex every color occurs [(n−1)/e][(n-1)/e] times; must K(n)K(n) have a totally multicolored (rainbow) copy of GG? The same with every color occurring at least (n/e)(1−ε)(n/e)(1-\varepsilon) times at every vertex. The two he singles out as perhaps the most interesting: with 55 colors and every vertex of degree above (n/5)(1−ε)(n/5)(1-\varepsilon) in every color, is there a rainbow C5C_5? and, as posed: "Let n=12t+1n=12t+1. Color the edges of K(n)K(n) by 66 colours so that every vertex has degree 2t2t in every colour. Is it true that our K(n)K(n) has a rainbow hexagon and a rainbow K(4)K(4)?" Finally the version with e+1e+1 colors, each occurring at least (n/(e+1))(1−ε)(n/(e+1))(1-\varepsilon) times at every vertex, and the remark that no one, not even its authors, has taken up the joint paper [3].
  • References (p. 9): Bollobás, Bull. London Math. Soc. 9 (1977), 97--98; Erdős, Hajnal and Szemerédi, Ann. Discrete Math. 12 (1982), 117--123; Erdős and Tuza, Ann. Discrete Math. 53 (1993), 83--88.

Compiled scope

All three pages were read on the page images. Items 5 and 6 are compiled by statement for the citing pages; items 1--4 are summarized, and item 3's conjecture and item 4's questions are matched to Problems 57 and 84 in the Bears on paragraph below. Nothing is proved in the paper and nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #85, as the site's source Er96: item 5 (p. 8) states the problem in the complementary form h(n)h(n), the largest minimum degree of a C4C_4-free graph on nn vertices (so the page's f(n)=h(n)+1f(n)=h(n)+1), with the monotonicity question (4), the bounded-drop version (5), the slowly growing l(n)l(n) version, and the size h(n)=(1+o(1))nh(n)=(1+o(1))\sqrt n (3). #552, as the site's source Er96 for the form R(C4,Sn)≥n+n−O(1)R(C_4,S_n)\ge n+\sqrt n-O(1) of that page's question: item 5's display (6), "h(n)=n1/2+O(1)h(n)=n^{1/2}+O(1)?", of which Erdős writes "Very likely (6) is too optimistic." #811, as the site's source Er96: item 6 (p. 9) states the Erdős--Tuza balanced-coloring question in general and singles out the 66-coloring of K(12t+1)K(12t+1) with every vertex of degree 2t2t in every color, asking for a rainbow hexagon and a rainbow K(4)K(4), together with the 55-color C5C_5 question. #57, as the site's source Er96: item 3 (p. 7, page image), the conjecture as posed: "Hajnal and I conjectured long ago that if GG has infinite chromatic number and if n1<n2<…n_1<n_2<\ldots is the sequence of the sizes of distinct cycles of GG, then ∑i1/ni=∞\sum_i1/n_i=\infty and perhaps even (1) lim‾⁡∑ni<x1/x=1/2\varlimsup\sum_{n_i<x}1/x=1/2", with the remark that (1) may be too optimistic and the lim‾⁡\varlimsup perhaps only positive; the 1996 wording sums over all cycle lengths where the problem's statement takes the odd ones, and display (1) is recorded as printed (the problem page reads it as an upper-density statement). #84, as the site's source Er96: item 4 (p. 8, page image), "a problem of Faudree and myself": f(n)f(n), the number of possible sequences (2) 3≤a1<⋯<ak≤n3\le a_1<\cdots<a_k\le n of the cycle lengths occurring in graphs of nn vertices; the trivial bound f(n)≤2n−2f(n)\le2^{n-2}, strict for n≥5n\ge5, the easy lower bound f(n)≥2n/2f(n)\ge2^{n/2}, the guess f(n)1/n→cf(n)^{1/n}\to c with 2≤c<2\sqrt2\le c<2, and the two statements they could not prove, f(n)/2n→0f(n)/2^n\to0 and f(n)/2n/2→∞f(n)/2^{n/2}\to\infty, the problem's two questions.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.