Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Girao 2024 monochromatic odd cycles edge coloured complete

../

lemma_2_1: If an n-vertex graph has no odd cycle of length at most 2k+1 for some k at least log_2 n, deleting at most (log_2 n / k) n vertices leaves a bipartite graph whose components have radius at most k.

lemma_2_2: A non-bipartite graph F has an odd cycle of length at most |V(F) minus V(H')| + (4r+1)m whenever H' has at most m components and lies in a subgraph H of F whose components have radius at most r.

lemma_2_3: Given q pairs of disjoint subsets of [n] with n at least 2^q/2, each pair covering at most a (1-epsilon) fraction of [n] with epsilon greater than 1/q, some set of at least 2^(epsilon q)/2 elements spans no pair a,b with a in A_i and b in B_i.

proposition_4_1: For q at least 1 and delta in (0,1), every q-coloring of the complete graph on (1+delta)2^q vertices has a monochromatic odd cycle of length O(q^2/delta).

theorem_1_2: A q-coloring of K_(2^q+1) forces a monochromatic odd cycle of length at most (2^q+1)/q^(1-epsilon) for every fixed positive epsilon and large q.


António Girão, Zach Hunter, Monochromatic odd cycles in edge-coloured complete graphs. Selected artifact: arXiv:2412.07708v1 (10 December 2024). The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:2412.07708), every other right reserved.

Erdős and Graham asked for the growth of L(q), the least length such that every q-edge-coloring of the complete graph on 2^q+1 vertices contains a monochromatic odd cycle of length at most L(q); Day and Johnson had shown L(q) is unbounded, growing at least like 2 to the power of order square root of log q. Theorem 1.2 proves that for every epsilon > 0 and all large q, every q-coloring of that complete graph contains a monochromatic odd cycle of length at most (2^q+1)/q^{1-epsilon}, so L(q) = O(2^q/q^{1-o(1)}), to the authors' knowledge the first bound of the form o(2^q) (p. 1). The +1 belongs inside the numerator. The proof (Section 3, p. 3) combines three lemmas of Section 2 (pp. 2--3): Lemma 2.1 shows a graph with no short odd cycle can be made bipartite by deleting a small vertex set leaving components of bounded radius; Lemma 2.2 bounds the shortest odd cycle in a non-bipartite graph in terms of the components of a bounded-radius subgraph; and Lemma 2.3 uses a random choice of one side from each of q pairs of disjoint sets to extract a large set spanning no edge across any pair.

In the concluding remarks (Section 4, pp. 3--4) the paper writes L(q,N)L(q,N) for a bound on the shortest monochromatic odd cycle forced in a qq-coloring of KNK_N, and Proposition 4.1 (p. 4) gives L(q,(1+δ)2q)≤O(q2δ−1)L(q,(1+\delta)2^q)\le O(q^2\delta^{-1}) for q≥1q\ge1 and δ∈(0,1)\delta\in(0,1), a bound that at the exact host K2q+1K_{2^q+1} gives nothing better than the trivial length 2q+12^q+1.

Read status. Claims checked for Theorem 1.2, Lemmas 2.1--2.3 and Proposition 4.1: their statements and hypotheses were read clause by clause on the page images. No proof is reconstructed or independently certified in this payload.

Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07708.

Bears on.

  • #609: Theorem 1.2 is an upper bound, f(n)≤(2n+1)/n1−εf(n)\le(2^n+1)/n^{1-\varepsilon} for each fixed ε>0\varepsilon>0 and all large nn, at the problem's exact host K2n+1K_{2^n+1}; it does not determine the growth of f(n)f(n). Lemmas 2.1--2.3 enter only as ingredients of its proof. Proposition 4.1 concerns the larger hosts K(1+δ)2nK_{(1+\delta)2^n} and at K2n+1K_{2^n+1} gives nothing better than the trivial bound f(n)≤2n+1f(n)\le2^n+1.

Results to transcribe.

  • Theorem 1.2 (p. 1): For every epsilon > 0 there is q0 such that every q-coloring of the complete graph on 2^q+1 vertices with q > q0 has a monochromatic odd cycle of length at most (2^q+1)/q^{1-epsilon}.
  • Lemma 2.1 (p. 2): If GG has nn vertices and no odd cycle of length at most 2k+12k+1, for some k≥log⁡2nk\ge\log_2 n, then some S⊂V(G)S\subset V(G) with ∣S∣≤(log⁡2n/k) n|S|\le(\log_2 n/k)\,n leaves G−SG-S bipartite with every component of radius at most kk.
  • Lemma 2.2 (p. 2): For a non-bipartite FF, a subgraph H⊂FH\subset F whose components have radius at most rr, and a subgraph H′H' of HH with at most mm components, FF has an odd cycle of length at most ∣V(F)∖V(H′)∣+(4r+1)m|V(F)\setminus V(H')|+(4r+1)m.
  • Lemma 2.3 (p. 2): Let n≥2q/2n\geq2^q/2 be an integer and let ε>1/q\varepsilon>1/q. Given qq pairs (Ai,Bi)(A_i,B_i) of disjoint subsets of [n][n] with ∣Ai∣+∣Bi∣≤(1−ε)n|A_i|+|B_i|\le(1-\varepsilon)n for each ii, there is a set L⊆[n]L\subseteq[n] of size at least 2εq/22^{\varepsilon q}/2 that contains no a∈Aia\in A_i together with a b∈Bib\in B_i, for any ii.
  • Proposition 4.1 (p. 4): For q≥1q\ge1 and δ∈(0,1)\delta\in(0,1), L(q,(1+δ)2q)≤O(q2δ−1)L(q,(1+\delta)2^q)\le O(q^2\delta^{-1}).

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.