Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Sarkozy 2006 anti ramsey problem burr erdos graham sos

../

theorem_4: For a connected bipartite graph that is not complete bipartite, a graph with a positive fraction of all possible edges needs more than any constant multiple of n colors before every copy is totally multicolored; the paper says the four-cycle case, Problem 810, stays open.


G. N. Sárközy and S. Selkow, On an anti-Ramsey problem of Burr, Erdős, Graham, and T. Sós, J. Graph Theory 52 (2006), 147--156; DOI 10.1002/jgt.20148 (no. 2; published online 25 January 2006 per the Crossref record read, whose abstract is the preprint's abstract up to small changes of wording and states the result informally, not in the form of Theorem 4).

The copy read for this card is the authors' preprint dated February 5, 2004 (dvips output of burr.dvi, nine letter-size pages). Its text layer drops the letter c and the Greek letters, so the statements below were read on the text layer and checked on the page image of p. 3. Page references are to the preprint. The journal version was not compared. Provenance: the repository's survey download set; the download URL was not recorded; 223,451 bytes. The preprint prints no copyright or license line on its first two or last two pages; its download URL was not recorded, so no host's terms could be checked, and the journal's version of record was not read; the term is unstated.

Read status: claims checked for Theorem 4 and the question it addresses (statements read clause by clause); the proof was not checked.

Contents

  • Definition (p. 2): χS(n,e,L)\chi_S(n,e,L) is the least rr such that some graph with nn vertices and ee edges has an edge-coloring with rr colors in which every copy of LL is totally multicolored (TMC), that is, has all its edges of different colors. It is the strong chromatic number of the hypergraph on E(G)E(G) whose edges are the copies of LL; the paper notes its relation to rk(n)r_k(n), the largest size of a subset of {1,…,n}\{1,\dots,n\} with no kk-term arithmetic progression.
  • Theorems 1--3 (p. 3) are quoted from Burr, Erdős, Frankl, Graham and Sós (the paper's [6]) and Burr, Erdős, Graham and Sós (its [7]): for a bipartite LL of maximum degree at least two containing two strongly independent edges, each α>0\alpha>0 has an α′>0\alpha'>0 with χS(n,e,L)>α′n2\chi_S(n,e,L)>\alpha'n^2 whenever e>αn2e>\alpha n^2; when LL has no pair of strongly independent edges and e<(1/2−ε)n2e<(1/2-\varepsilon)n^2 for a fixed ε>0\varepsilon>0, χS(n,e,L)=O(n2/log⁡n)\chi_S(n,e,L)=O(n^2/\log n); and for P4P_4, χS(n,cnr3(n),P4)≤n\chi_S(n,cnr_3(n),P_4)\le n for a suitable c>0c>0, while for each α>0\alpha>0, χS(n,αn2,P4)>cn\chi_S(n,\alpha n^2,P_4)>cn for every cc once nn is large.
  • The question of [7] (p. 3): for LL connected, bipartite and not a star, is χS(n,αn2,L)/n→∞\chi_S(n,\alpha n^2,L)/n\to\infty as n→∞n\to\infty? The statement is false for stars.
  • Theorem 4 (p. 3; proof in section 3, pp. 5--8): given α,c>0\alpha,c>0, a connected bipartite LL other than a complete bipartite graph has χS(n,e,L)>cn\chi_S(n,e,L)>cn whenever e>αn2e>\alpha n^2 and n≥n0n\ge n_0, for a threshold the paper writes n0(α,c)n_0(\alpha,c); the proof's threshold also depends on ∣V(L)∣|V(L)|, so LL is fixed first (see the result page). The paper adds that the original question "still remains open for complete bipartite graphs that are not stars, for instance for C4C_4" (p. 3). The proof applies the degree form of the Regularity Lemma (Lemma 1, p. 4) and reduces the general case to an induced P4P_4 in LL. Page: theorem_4 (the statement re-read on the page image of p. 3).

Compiled scope

The introduction (pp. 1--3) was read in full and Theorem 4 was checked on the page image; sections 2--3 were skimmed for structure only and the proof was not verified. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #810, whose question is whether χS(n,e,C4)≤n\chi_S(n,e,C_4)\le n can hold with e≥ϵn2e\ge\epsilon n^2 for all large nn; Theorem 4 rules this out for every connected bipartite LL that is not complete bipartite and leaves the C4C_4 case, which is the problem itself, open.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.