Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Tikhomirov 2024 remark ramsey number hypercube
corollary_1_2: Tikhomirov's upper bound on the Ramsey number of the hypercube: for all large n, r(Q_n) is at most 2^{2n-cn+1} + 2 with the universal constant c of Theorem 1.1, for which 0.03656 is admissible.
theorem_1_1: The embedding theorem behind the hypercube Ramsey bound: for large n, every bipartite graph with both parts of size at least 2^{2n-cn} and at least half of all cross pairs as edges contains the n-cube; c = 0.03656 is admissible.
K. Tikhomirov, A remark on the Ramsey number of the hypercube, European J. Combin. 120 (2024), 103954, doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2024.103954 (Elsevier; the Crossref record, dates the issue August 2024 and the record's creation 25 March 2024). Preprint arXiv:2208.14568 (v1 30 August 2022, v3 2 March 2024; the arXiv listing carries no journal reference).
The copy read for this card is arXiv:2208.14568v3 [math.CO] 2 Mar 2024, 24 pages with a text layer; its page numbers are the preprint's, and the journal text was not compared. Pages 1--3 were read on the page images. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:2208.14568), every other right reserved.
Read status: claims checked for Theorem 1.1, the Remark after it, Corollary 1.2 and Remark 1.3 (pp. 2--3), read clause by clause on the page images, and for the introduction's restatement of the prior bound (p. 1); the proof (Sections 2--6 and the appendix) was not read.
The paper improves the exponent in the upper bound for the Ramsey number of the hypercube (the graph on whose edges are the geometric edges). The introduction (p. 1) recalls the Burr--Erdős conjecture that , the improvements of the trivial bound by Beck, Graham--Rödl--Ruciński, Shi, Fox--Sudakov, Conlon--Fox--Sudakov and Lee, and quotes the previous best bound as "[4, Theorem 4.1]", its [4] being the same authors' 2016 Short proofs of some extremal results II: for every bipartite graph on vertices with maximum degree , , which gives ; it also notes (from its [8]) that for every and some bipartite graph on vertices of maximum degree at most has , with a constant, so any proof of the conjecture must use more of the cube than its degree and order. Pages 2--3 explain why the dependent random choice scheme (I)--(II) alone stalls around (a random ambient graph whose common neighborhoods of -tuples concentrate on small sets) and how a randomized "block" embedding of the facets of the cube gets past it. The main result, Theorem 1.1, embeds , for , into every bipartite graph with both parts of size at least and edge density at least , for universal constants ; the Remark after it says the proof allows for large , and Corollary 1.2 deduces for by the standard majority-color equipartition (Remark 1.3). The paper does not print the exponent numerically; is a subtraction made here, so the corollary reads for large . Corollary 3.2 (p. 6, page image) is the embedding statement that the scheme (I)--(II) alone gives, for and bipartite graphs of density with parts of sizes at least and ; with Remark 1.3 it yields the weaker (p. 7).
Contents
- Introduction (p. 1): the definitions; the Burr--Erdős conjecture ; the prior bound restated as Theorem [4, Theorem 4.1], for bipartite on vertices with maximum degree , and Theorem [4, Theorem 4.7], the embedding statement behind it; the lower bound for some bipartite graphs of maximum degree (from [8]).
- Pages 2--3: the barrier example on vertices per part, and the block-embedding idea; the trichotomy (a)--(c) behind the proof and its structural part, Proposition 6.3.
- Theorem 1.1 (p. 2): universal constants such that for every and every bipartite graph with and , the hypercube can be embedded into ; Remark: is admissible for large.
- Corollary 1.2 (p. 2): for , ; Remark 1.3 (p. 3) gives the deduction from Theorem 1.1.
- Corollary 3.2 (p. 6, page image): for every there is such that for , embeds into every bipartite graph of density at least with one part of size at least and the other of size at least ; with Remark 1.3 it gives (p. 7), the bound of the scheme (I)--(II) alone.
Compiled scope
Pages 1--3 were read on the page images; of pp. 4--24 (the proof, Proposition 6.3 and Appendix A), only the notation of p. 5, the section headings, the statement of Corollary 3.2 with the sentence after it (pp. 6--7) and the reference list (p. 22) were read, on the page images. No proof was checked and nothing here is independently reviewed.
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.14568.
Bears on. #181: Corollary 1.2 with the Remark's is an upper bound on of order for all large , short of the linear bound the problem asks for; the paper presents it as improving the previous best bound (abstract, p. 1), and the site's commentary cites it as " ... is permissible"; the introduction's quotation of [4, Theorem 4.1] is the page's second-hand record of that prior bound, and its [4] is Conlon, Fox and Sudakov's Short proofs of some extremal results II (J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 121 (2016), 173--196), not their 2012 On two problems in graph Ramsey theory: the reference list (p. 22, page image) names the 2016 paper, and Theorem 4.1 with Corollary 4.2, , stands on p. 7 of the arXiv preprint filed as conlon_2016_short_proofs_extremal_results_ii (page image); that paper's journal text is not held.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.