Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Yuan 2021 anti ramsey numbers paths
theorem_1: The exact anti-Ramsey number of the path on k vertices for every n at least k at least five, the formula of Erdős, Simonovits and Sós, proved through connected Turán numbers and stability results stated for all vertex counts, one case of which the paper notes is unproved in its sources; the second question of Problem 1105, answered in a preprint.
Long-Tu Yuan, The anti-Ramsey number for paths. arXiv:2102.00807v3 (9 February 2021). The PDF's title is singular; the arXiv listing's title, "Anti-Ramsey numbers for paths", is plural, and the site's reference text uses the singular.
Retained artifact. The folder-name PDF is arXiv:2102.00807v3 (9 February 2021; v1 is of 1 February 2021), ten A4 pages with a clean text layer. The arXiv listing carries no journal reference, a Crossref bibliographic query for the title found no journal record, and the Semantic Scholar citation list (seven records, 2022--2026) contains no published version (all read). A preprint: the site accepts it as the proof of the path formula, and the community database records the problem as proved since 1 February 2026; no refereed version and no independent review are known here. The arXiv record (https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.00807, read 2026-10-02) names the CC0 1.0 Universal public domain dedication.
Read status: claims checked for the definitions, Theorem 1, the two Erdős–Simonovits–Sós colorings and the prior-work sentences (p. 1, page image) and for Theorems 2--3 as quoted and the definition of ar(n,k) (p. 2, text layer), read clause by clause; the proof (Section 3 onward, Lemma 4 and Appendix A) was not read. Footnote 1 (p. 2), Corollaries 5--6 and the Remark (p. 3) were read clause by clause: the Remark declares Corollary 6(d) unproved in the paper's [7, 8] and refers to its [17] for it, and footnote 1 asserts the extension of [8, Theorem 2.3] to connected P_k-free graphs without proof.
The anti-Ramsey number AR(n,H) is the largest number of colors on the edges of K_n with no rainbow copy of H; Erdős, Simonovits and Sós introduced it and gave two colorings for H = P_k (one coloring a K_{k-2} rainbow, one making all edges at a set of floor((k-3)/2) vertices rainbow), conjecturing they are optimal. Theorem 1 proves this: for n >= k >= 5 and l = floor((k-1)/2), AR(n,P_k) = max{ binom(k-2,2) + 1, binom(l-1,2) + (l-1)(n-l+1) + eps } with eps = 1 for odd k and 2 for even k. Earlier, Simonovits and Sós had the answer only for n at least a constant times t^2, t = floor((k-3)/2), and claimed the range n >= 5t/2 + c "without proof" (p. 1). The proof converts the problem to connected Turán numbers for paths (Erdős-Gallai, Faudree-Schelp/Kopylov Theorem 2, Balister-Győri-Lehel-Schelp/Kopylov Theorem 3) and applies stability results of Füredi, Kostochka, Luo and Verstraëte stated for all vertex counts (Corollaries 5--6, p. 3), which is what removes the largeness assumption on n; the paper's Remark (p. 3) says that Corollary 6(d) is not proved in [7, 8] and points to [17] for it, and footnote 1 (p. 2) asserts without proof the extension of [8, Theorem 2.3] to connected P_k-free graphs. This settles problem 1105's path question, the Erdős-Simonovits-Sós anti-Ramsey problem for paths, in the full range n >= k >= 5; the paper says nothing about cycles.
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.00807.
Bears on. #1105: Theorem 1 (p. 1) is the status-defining result for the problem's path question, in a preprint; the cycle question is not touched.
Results to transcribe.
- Theorem 1 (p. 1): For n >= k >= 5 and l = floor((k-1)/2), AR(n,P_k) = max{binom(k-2,2)+1, binom(l-1,2)+(l-1)(n-l+1)+eps}, eps = 1 if k odd and 2 if k even, confirming the Erdős-Simonovits-Sós conjecture (page theorem_1).
- Method (pp. 1--3): Reduction to connected Turán numbers for paths plus stability results of Füredi, Kostochka, Luo and Verstraëte stated for all n (Corollaries 5--6), avoiding a largeness assumption; the Remark (p. 3) notes that Corollary 6(d) is not proved in [7, 8], and footnote 1 (p. 2) asserts the extension of [8, Theorem 2.3] without proof.
- Theorem 3 (cited, p. 2): for n >= k, excon(n,P_k) = max{h(n,k-1,1), h(n,k-1,s)} with s = floor((k-2)/2), the connected Turán input to the proof.