Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (p. 2). For a finite set , is the random subset of containing each element independently with probability ; -spread is as in Lemma 2.
Theorem 3 (Main technical estimate of Rao and Tao, p. 2). There is a constant such that for every integer , all reals and , and every family of -element subsets of a finite set : if is -spread and , then .
The theorem is not the paper's own: the paper attributes it to Rao (Discrete Analysis 2020) and Tao (blog post, 2020), and its appendix records how it follows from their proofs. Lemma 4 shows the spread hypothesis is essentially best possible.
Proof pointer
Appendix, p. 3. The paper says the theorem follows from Tao's proof of his Proposition 5, and gives a short derivation from Rao's proof of his Lemma 4: Rao's argument controls a uniformly random subset of size , and a Chernoff bound transfers this to , using that forces . The resulting constant is with Rao's constant.
Read depth
Claims checked: Theorem 3 was read clause by clause on p. 2 and the appendix derivation on p. 3 followed; Rao's and Tao's underlying arguments were not read here. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
External: Rao, Coding for sunflowers, Discrete Analysis 2020 (proof of Lemma 4, card rao_2020_coding_sunflowers), and Tao's 2020 blog post; a Chernoff bound from Janson, Łuczak and Ruciński.
Source. T. Bell, S. Chueluecha and L. Warnke, Note on sunflowers, Discrete Math. 344 (2021), no. 7, 112367, doi:10.1016/j.disc.2021.112367; the edition read, arXiv:2009.09327v2, is named on the source card, and the labels and pages here are its.
Bears on
- Problem 20: the input of Lemma 2 and so of Theorem 1; it decides nothing about the problem by itself.