Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problems and results on 1-cross-intersecting set pair systems

../

corollary_1_2: Füredi, Gyárfás and Király's product construction for 1-cross-intersecting set-pair systems (Proposition 1.1) and its consequence from the five-cycle system: an (n,n)-bounded 1-cross-intersecting system of size 5^(n/2) for even n and 2 * 5^((n-1)/2) for odd n (Corollary 1.2).

proposition_1_3: Füredi, Gyárfás and Király's Fisher-type inequality: in a 1-cross-intersecting set-pair system the characteristic vectors of the sets A_i are linearly independent over the reals, so the size is at most the number of vertices of the first family.

proposition_1_5: Füredi, Gyárfás and Király's bound m <= n^2 + n + 1 for an (n,n)-bounded cross-intersecting set-pair system whose first family is a linear hypergraph, with no condition on the other intersections, and their Constructions 5.1 and 5.2 showing it asymptotically sharp.

theorem_1_4: Füredi, Gyárfás and Király's sharp bound for 1-cross-intersecting set-pair systems with |A_i| <= 2 and |B_i| <= n: for n >= 4 the size is at most (floor(n/2)+1)(ceil(n/2)+1), this is attained, and the exact maxima for n = 2 and n = 3 are 5 and 7.

theorem_1_6: Füredi, Gyárfás and Király's bound m <= n^2/2 + n + 1 for an (n,n)-bounded 1-cross-intersecting set-pair system in which both families are linear hypergraphs, asymptotically sharp by their Construction 5.3.

theorem_1_7: Füredi, Gyárfás and Király's bound m <= binom(n,2) + 1, for n > 2, for an (n,n)-bounded 1-cross-intersecting set-pair system in which both families are 1-intersecting, with uniformity and regularity forced at equality when n >= 4.

theorem_1_8: Füredi, Gyárfás and Király's identification of the largest m for which the crown graph B_2m has a biclique partition of thickness n, and the largest m for which the cocktail-party graph T_2m has a clique partition of thickness n, with the largest sizes of (n,n)-bounded 1-cross-intersecting set-pair systems, without and with both families 1-intersecting.


Zoltán Füredi, András Gyárfás, and Zoltán Király, “Problems and results on 1-cross-intersecting set pair systems,” Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 32 (2023), 691–702. Published article, DOI. The alternate preprint is arXiv:1911.03067, version 2 (stamped 24 July 2022; its internal title page is dated 26 July 2022). The published article is the edition this card cites, and the arXiv v2 preprint is the explicit alternate edition compared below.

A cross-intersecting set-pair system (SPS) of size m≥2m\geq2 consists of finite sets A1,…,AmA_1,\ldots,A_m and B1,…,BmB_1,\ldots,B_m with Ai∩Bi=∅A_i\cap B_i=\varnothing for every ii and Ai∩Bj≠∅A_i\cap B_j\neq\varnothing for i≠ji\neq j. Writing A={Ai}i=1m\mathcal A=\{A_i\}_{i=1}^m and B={Bi}i=1m\mathcal B=\{B_i\}_{i=1}^m, the system is (a,b)(a,b)-bounded when ∣Ai∣≤a|A_i|\leq a and ∣Bi∣≤b|B_i|\leq b for every ii, and it is 1-cross-intersecting when ∣Ai∩Bj∣=1|A_i\cap B_j|=1 for every i≠ji\neq j.

Selected estimates

Proposition 1.1 is multiplicative: an (a1,b1)(a_1,b_1)-bounded 1-cross-intersecting SPS of size m1m_1 and an (a2,b2)(a_2,b_2)-bounded one of size m2m_2 produce an (a1+a2,b1+b2)(a_1+a_2,b_1+b_2)-bounded 1-cross-intersecting SPS of size m1m2m_1m_2. Applying it to the five-cycle system H(2,2)H(2,2) gives Corollary 1.2: an (n,n)(n,n)-bounded system of size 5n/25^{n/2} for even nn, and of size 2⋅5(n−1)/22\cdot5^{(n-1)/2} for odd nn.

If the SPS is 1-cross-intersecting and V=⋃iAiV=\bigcup_iA_i, Proposition 1.3 says that the characteristic vectors of the AiA_i are linearly independent in RV\mathbb R^V. Theorem 1.4 is sharp: for n≥4n\geq4, a (2,n)(2,n)-bounded 1-cross-intersecting SPS of size mm obeys

m≤(⌊n2⌋+1)(⌈n2⌉+1),m\leq\left(\left\lfloor\frac n2\right\rfloor+1\right) \left(\left\lceil\frac n2\right\rceil+1\right),

and the exact values for n=2,3n=2,3 are 55 and 77.

A hypergraph is linear if distinct edges meet in at most one vertex, and it is 1-intersecting if distinct edges meet in exactly one vertex. For an (n,n)(n,n)-bounded cross-intersecting SPS with A\mathcal A linear, Proposition 1.5 gives m≤n2+n+1m\leq n^2+n+1. If the SPS is (n,n)(n,n)-bounded and 1-cross-intersecting and both A\mathcal A and B\mathcal B are linear, Theorem 1.6 gives

m≤12n2+n+1.m\leq\frac12n^2+n+1.

If the SPS is (n,n)(n,n)-bounded and 1-cross-intersecting and both families are 1-intersecting, Theorem 1.7 gives m≤(n2)+1m\leq\binom n2+1 for n>2n>2. For n≥4n\geq4, equality additionally forces ∣Ai∣=∣Bi∣=n|A_i|=|B_i|=n for every ii and dA(v)=dB(v)=nd_{\mathcal A}(v)=d_{\mathcal B}(v)=n for every vertex vv.

Partition formulation

Theorem 1.8 identifies these maxima with thickness parameters. Let B2mB_{2m} be the bipartite graph obtained from Km,mK_{m,m} by deleting a perfect matching (the crown graph), and let T2mT_{2m} be the cocktail-party graph obtained from K2mK_{2m} by deleting a perfect matching. The maximum mm for which B2mB_{2m} has a biclique partition of thickness nn equals the maximum size of an (n,n)(n,n)-bounded 1-cross-intersecting SPS. The maximum mm for which T2mT_{2m} has a clique partition of thickness nn equals the maximum under the additional condition that both set families are 1-intersecting.

The statement comparison uses arXiv physical pp. 2–5 and published article pp. 691–694; the title/abstract pages were checked separately. The pages read for the comparison are arXiv physical/printed pp. 1–5 and published physical pp. 1–6 (article pp. 691–696). ArXiv p. 6 was not read, and no full-body byte-equivalence claim is made. The published copy adds final pagination, reception history, DOI and license material around the preprint content.

Section 5 (pp. 699--701) builds, from affine planes AG(2,q)\mathrm{AG}(2,q) and Hoheisel's theorem on primes in short intervals, systems showing that Proposition 1.5 and Theorems 1.6 and 1.7 are asymptotically the best possible. Section 6 (pp. 701--702) reports Holzman's bound m(a,b,1)≤(29/30)(a+ba)m(a,b,1)\le(29/30)\binom{a+b}a for a,b≥2a,b\ge2 and its improvement to 5/65/6 by Kostochka, McCourt and Nahvi, and poses Conjecture 1 (p. 702), that the largest (n,n)(n,n)-bounded 1-cross-intersecting SPS is o((2nn))o(\binom{2n}n) in the form lim⁡n→∞mn(∗,∗,1)/mn(∗,∗,∗)=0\lim_{n\to\infty}m_n(*,*,1)/m_n(*,*,*)=0.

Read status: claims checked for the results linked below. Their statements and the definitions were read clause by clause on the printed pages of the published article, whose labels and page numbers the card and its result pages use; the proofs were followed but not checked step by step. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. No Erdős problem: the paper states no relation to one.

Results.

  • Proposition 1.1 and Corollary 1.2 (p. 692): 1-cross-intersecting systems multiply, giving (n,n)(n,n)-bounded ones of size 5n/25^{n/2} for even nn and 2⋅5(n−1)/22\cdot5^{(n-1)/2} for odd nn.
  • Proposition 1.3 (p. 693): in a 1-cross-intersecting SPS the characteristic vectors of the AiA_i are linearly independent, so m≤∣⋃iAi∣m\le|\bigcup_iA_i|.
  • Theorem 1.4 (p. 693): for n≥4n\ge4 the sharp bound (⌊n/2⌋+1)(⌈n/2⌉+1)(\lfloor n/2\rfloor+1)(\lceil n/2\rceil+1) for a (2,n)(2,n)-bounded 1-cross-intersecting SPS; 55 and 77 for n=2,3n=2,3.
  • Proposition 1.5 (p. 693): m≤n2+n+1m\le n^2+n+1 for an (n,n)(n,n)-bounded cross-intersecting SPS with A\mathcal A linear, asymptotically sharp.
  • Theorem 1.6 (p. 693): m≤12n2+n+1m\le\frac12n^2+n+1 for an (n,n)(n,n)-bounded 1-cross-intersecting SPS with both families linear, asymptotically sharp.
  • Theorem 1.7 (p. 693): m≤(n2)+1m\le\binom n2+1 for n>2n>2 for an (n,n)(n,n)-bounded 1-cross-intersecting SPS with both families 1-intersecting.
  • Theorem 1.8 (p. 694): the thickness formulation through biclique partitions of B2mB_{2m} and clique partitions of T2mT_{2m}.

For editorial compilation topic context only, the inspected paper does not cite the linked 1973 hypergraph source; see Lovász's covering and coloring source. No numbered Erdős problem connection is supported by the inspected material, and this statement digest carries no complete-proof credit.

The published PDF prints on its first page "© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.": the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. For the arXiv v2 PDF, the arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1911.03067), every other right reserved.

Only the edition under an open license is held; the source's other editions are not, since no license on record permits their redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.