Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Couplings and matchings: combinatorial notes on Strassen's theorem
lemma_3: Koperberg's subforest lemma: a vertex-weighted bipartite graph with w(A) = w(B) that satisfies w(U) <= w(N_G(U)) for every U contained in A has a spanning forest, with the same weights, that satisfies the same condition.
proposition_4: Koperberg's weighted form of Strassen's theorem: in a vertex-weighted bipartite graph with w(A) = w(B), the condition w(U) <= w(N(U)) for every U contained in A holds exactly when nonnegative edge weights exist whose sum over the edges at each vertex is that vertex's weight.
proposition_6: Koperberg's deficiency forms: a bipartite graph with |A| = |B| = n has a matching of at least n - k edges exactly when |U| <= |N_G(U)| + k for every U contained in A (Proposition 5), and for epsilon >= 0 a coupling of P and P' gives mass at least 1 - epsilon to R exactly when P(U) <= P'(N_R(U)) + epsilon for every U contained in A (Proposition 6).
theorem_1: Strassen's theorem for finite sets as Koperberg states it: probability measures P on A and P' on B have a coupling giving full mass to a relation R between A and B exactly when P(U) <= P'(N_R(U)) for every U contained in A.
theorem_2: Hall's marriage theorem as Koperberg states it: a bipartite graph with bipartition {A, B} and |A| = |B| has a perfect matching exactly when |U| <= |N_G(U)| for every U contained in A.
Source and versions
Twan Koperberg, Couplings and Matchings: Combinatorial notes on Strassen's theorem, arXiv:2202.02092, version 1 (4 February 2022). The title page names Twan Koperberg; the running head uses V. T. Koperberg.
The paper was subsequently published in Statistics & Probability Letters 209 (June 2024), article 110089, DOI 10.1016/j.spl.2024.110089. The publisher record and Koperberg's Leiden publication list agree on the 2024 publication identity.
The copy read for this card is the ten-page arXiv v1. The publisher PDF was not read, so the mathematical statements and page locators below are verified against v1; no claim of textual or byte identity with the 2024 journal version is made. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:2202.02092), every other right reserved.
Finite Strassen and Hall criteria
Let be finite sets, , and let be probability measures on . A coupling is a probability measure on all of with marginals . Theorem 1 (PDF p. 2) states that a coupling with exists if and only if
where .
For a finite bipartite graph with bipartition and , Theorem 2 (PDF p. 3) gives the exact Hall form used in the paper: the graph has a perfect matching if and only if
Weighted edge flows
A weighted graph in Section 2.1 has a nonnegative vertex weight function . Proposition 4 (PDF pp. 5–6) assumes and says that the weighted neighborhood conditions
are equivalent to the existence of a nonnegative edge-weight function satisfying
Thus the conclusion is a fractional edge flow with prescribed incident sums, rather than an ordinary matching.
The paper first proves the subforest lemma by induction (PDF pp. 3–4), then uses a spanning forest and another induction to construct the edge weights (PDF pp. 5–6), and finally normalizes them to obtain Theorem 1. Remark 1 (PDF p. 5) separately explains that the subforest lemma can be obtained from a result on vertices of a transportation polytope. The polyhedral observation is an alternative route, not the paper's main derivation.
Deficiency forms
For a bipartite graph with , Proposition 5 (PDF p. 7, proved on pp. 7–8) states that a matching with exists if and only if
The print leaves the range of unstated; its proof adjoins new vertices to each side, so is a nonnegative integer.
Proposition 6 (PDF p. 8, proved on pp. 8–9) gives the coupling analog. For , there is a full coupling of on whose mass on the relation satisfies
if and only if
The proof scales rational weights to a matching-with-deficiency instance and then passes to arbitrary measures and by compactness. This is a proof pointer only.
Relation to the library
PDF p. 6 notes, citing Lovász and Plummer's Matching Theory (Corollary 2.1.5), that Proposition 4 can also be derived from the max-flow min-cut theorem, by a method similar to the derivation of the marriage theorem from max-flow min-cut in [[set_systems/ford_1958_network_flow_systems_representatives/_index|Ford and Fulkerson's representative-flow paper]] (the paper's reference [4]). The coupling and matching formulations remain distinct. No numbered Erdős-problem connection is supported by the inspected material. The selected definitions, statements and method pointers were checked on PDF pp. 1–9; no complete proof credit is claimed.
Read status. Claims checked: Theorems 1 and 2, Lemma 3, Remark 1 and Propositions 4 to 6 were read clause by clause on the print (pp. 2–8), and their proofs (pp. 4–9) were followed but not checked step by step.
Bears on. None: the paper names no Erdős problem, and no problem page cites it.
Results. Theorem 1 (p. 2); Theorem 2 (p. 3); Lemma 3 (p. 3, with Remark 1, p. 5); Proposition 4 (p. 5); Propositions 5 and 6 (pp. 7 and 8).
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.