Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Hyperplane covers of finite spaces and applications
proposition_1_3: Nagy, Pach and Tomon's upper bound f_q(n) <= ceil(n/2) q + 1 for irredundant hyperplane covers of F_q^n with spanning normal vectors, from the subadditivity of f_q(n) - 1.
theorem_1_1: Nagy, Pach and Tomon's lower bound for irredundant hyperplane covers of F_p^n with spanning normal vectors: at least (1-o(1)) n log p / log log p hyperplanes, and at least (1+eps_p) n when p >= 5.
theorem_1_10: Nagy, Pach and Tomon's prime-power version of their A-basis theorem: for q = p^alpha, some A in F_q of size (1+o(1)) log_2 q makes the union of any alpha p bases of F_q^n an A-basis.
theorem_1_11: Nagy, Pach and Tomon's bound for irredundant coset covers of abelian groups: some absolute c > 0 bounds the index of the intersection of the k covering subgroups by e^{c k log log k}.
theorem_1_2: Nagy, Pach and Tomon's prime-power version of their hyperplane-cover bound: for q = p^alpha, f_q(n) >= (1-o(1)) n log q / log log p, the error term depending only on p.
theorem_1_6: Nagy, Pach and Tomon's choosability theorem: for q = p^alpha, every invertible n x n matrix is (q-k, q-k)-choosable when k is at most (1/2 - o(1)) log q / log log p; the print takes the matrix over F_p.
theorem_1_7: Nagy, Pach and Tomon's theorem that for k >= 2 and every prime power q above some q_0(k), any k invertible n x n matrices over F_q admit one vector x with no M_i x having a zero coordinate.
theorem_1_8: Nagy, Pach and Tomon's strengthening of the weak additive basis conjecture for p >= 5: some A in F_p of size (1+o(1)) log_2 p makes the union of any p bases of F_p^n an A-basis.
theorem_8_1: Nagy, Pach and Tomon's structural bound for the least irredundant coset cover with trivially intersecting subgroups of a finite abelian group of order p_1^{n_1}...p_m^{n_m}, printed with an ambiguous final -1.
Source
János Nagy, Péter Pál Pach and István Tomon, Hyperplane covers of finite spaces and applications, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 379 (1) (2026), 137–156, DOI 10.1090/tran/9483. The copy read for this card is the 18-page author manuscript linked from Pach's publication list at https://cs.bme.hu/~ppp/publications/Hyperplane_covers.pdf, with internal pages 1–18. These page locators do not identify the 20-page journal layout, and the manuscript has not been compared with the publisher PDF. The manuscript prints no journal header, copyright or license line, the list that links it states no license, and the AMS terms for the version of record do not govern it, so the license is unstated.
The same publication list identifies [[additive_bases/nagy_pach_tomon_2021_additive_bases_coset_covers/_index|the earlier additive-bases and coset-covers manuscript]] as now contained in this article. The two versions have separate theorem labels and statements.
Mathematical setting
For a prime power and a positive integer , a hyperplane in $\mathbb F_q^n$ has the form
A covering is irredundant when no proper subcollection still covers the space. The paper writes for the least size of an irredundant covering of by hyperplanes whose normal vectors span . It records and ; it also proves that is subadditive, so has a limit.
Hyperplane-cover bounds
Theorem 1.1 (PDF p. 2) states that for every prime and positive integer ,
where the error term depends only on . If , there is also an such that
Theorem 1.2 (PDF p. 2) extends the first bound to a prime power :
with the error term depending only on . Proposition 1.3 (PDF p. 2) gives
Conjecture 1.4 (PDF p. 2) proposes an absolute constant such that
for every prime (or prime power) and integer .
Non-vanishing linear maps
For a prime , the Alon–Jaeger–Tarsi conjecture asks whether every invertible admits an for which every coordinate of both and is nonzero. More generally, is -choosable when, for every with and , there is an with $Mx\in Y_1\times\cdots\times Y_n$. Conjecture 1.5 (PDF p. 2), DeVos's Choosability conjecture, states that an invertible is -choosable for every .
Theorem 1.6 (PDF p. 3) states that, for , every invertible is -choosable whenever
where the error depends only on . Theorem 1.7 (PDF p. 3) states that, for every positive integer , there is a such that for every prime power , every positive integer , and every invertible , there is an for which all have no zero coordinates.
The PDF prints in Theorem 1.6 while its choice-set sizes use ; that apparent field mismatch is retained as printed. The field in the journal version has not been checked. This digest does not silently replace by .
Additive bases
For , a multiset is an -basis when every has a representation
The case is an additive basis. Theorem 1.8 (PDF p. 3) states that for and positive , some of size makes every union of linear bases of an -basis. Theorem 1.10 (PDF p. 4) gives the prime-power version: if , some of size makes every union of linear bases of an -basis.
Abelian coset covers
If is an irredundant coset cover of an abelian group , Theorem 1.11 (PDF p. 4) gives an absolute constant with
Theorem 1.11 permits infinite abelian groups as well: the conclusion bounds the index of the intersection of the covering subgroups.
The structural Theorem 8.1 concerns a finite abelian group with order . Here is the minimum size of an irredundant coset cover whose covering subgroups have trivial intersection. The displayed formula in the author manuscript (PDF p. 14) is literally
There is a summation ambiguity. With the final outside the sum, this cannot hold in general: has the irredundant cover consisting of its even subgroup and the three singleton cosets , , . The covering subgroups have trivial intersection, giving $\phi(\mathbb Z/6\mathbb Z)\le4$, whereas .
The interpretation suggested by the proof is instead
This is an editorial interpretation, not the literal displayed statement: PDF p. 15 likewise prints , then uses subadditivity of in Claim 8.4 and proves . Placing each inside the sum is consistent with that use. The complete proof of the interpreted theorem has not been reconstructed here, and the publisher version has not been checked for a correction. Any use of this structural bound must retain that qualification.
These applications connect hyperplane covers, linear maps, additive bases and coset covers, with their distinct field and group hypotheses.
Proof scope
The entries above record definitions and selected statements with exact manuscript locators. Complete proofs are not reproduced here. The field mismatch in Theorem 1.6 and summation ambiguity in Theorem 8.1 are recorded explicitly; the four-coset example is a local consistency check of the printed formula, not a proof of its proposed interpretation.
Read status: claims checked. Theorems 1.1, 1.2, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.10, 1.11 and 8.1, Proposition 1.3 and the lemmas their proofs use were read clause by clause on the page images of the manuscript, and the proofs were followed, that of Theorem 8.1 in outline. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Results.
- Theorem 1.1 (p. 2): , and for .
- Theorem 1.2 (p. 2): for .
- Proposition 1.3 (p. 2): , with the subadditivity Lemma 5.4 (p. 10).
- Theorem 1.6 (p. 3): -choosability of invertible matrices for .
- Theorem 1.7 (p. 3): for and , any invertible matrices over have a common with every nowhere zero.
- Theorem 1.8 (p. 3): for , some of size makes every union of bases an -basis.
- Theorem 1.10 (p. 4): the same over with bases and .
- Theorem 1.11 (p. 4): an irredundant cover of an abelian group by cosets has .
- Theorem 8.1 (p. 14): the lower bound for , with the summation ambiguity recorded above.
Bears on. No Erdős problem: the paper names none, and no problem page of the corpus is stated in terms of these results.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.