Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


For the product law and corrected range of moments, let E=1{Z≤x}E=\mathbf1_{\{Z\le x\}}. Then

H(Y1,…,Yn∣E=1)≥Hn(x)−Ox0,δ ⁣(n/c).H(Y_1,\ldots,Y_n\mid E=1) \ge\mathcal H_n(x)-O_{x_0,\delta}\!\left(\sqrt{n/c}\right).

This is the source's route to the lower bound in Lemma 1. The separate finite-window argument is not substituted for it.

Source: published PDF, pp. 4–7. The cutoff is a fixed sufficiently large DcnD\sqrt{cn} in place of the printed 10. The factor (1+t)/(1+et)(1+t)/(1+e^t) below retains a term dropped in the printed summation. Constants may depend on the fixed positive lower bound x0x_0.

Bears on. Problem 297.

Proof

Write q=cnq=cn, a=Pr⁡(E=1)a=\Pr(E=1), and b=1−ab=1-a. The moment estimates and Berry–Esseen give a=1/2+O(q−1/2)a=1/2+O(q^{-1/2}), so a,b≥1/3a,b\ge1/3 for sufficiently large nn. For a coordinate mm, conditional on Ym=1Y_m=1 the variable ZZ has the law of Zm′=Z−Ym/m+1/mZ_m'=Z-Y_m/m+1/m. Its mean is x+(1−pm)/mx+(1-p_m)/m and its variance is Θ(q−1)\Theta(q^{-1}) uniformly by moments. The third-moment estimate holds after the same removal. Since the normal distribution function is Lipschitz, Berry–Esseen gives

Pr⁡(E=0∣Ym=1)=12+O(q−1/2+qm).\Pr(E=0\mid Y_m=1) =\frac12+O\left(q^{-1/2}+\frac{\sqrt q}{m}\right).

Bayes' formula, divided by bb, now yields for rm=Pr⁡(Ym=1∣E=0)r_m=\Pr(Y_m=1\mid E=0),

∣rm−pm∣≤Cpm(q−1/2+qm).(1)|r_m-p_m|\le C p_m\left(q^{-1/2}+\frac{\sqrt q}{m}\right). \tag{1}

Choose a fixed DD sufficiently large in terms of these constants. For m≤Dqm\le D\sqrt q use the elementary entropy upper bound 1. For larger mm, concavity gives h(rm)≤h(pm)+h′(pm)(rm−pm)h(r_m)\le h(p_m)+h'(p_m)(r_m-p_m). Since 0<pm<1/20<p_m<1/2, 0<h′(pm)≤log⁡2(1/pm)0<h'(p_m)\le\log_2(1/p_m); therefore (1) implies

h(rm)≤h(pm)+C(q−1/2+qm)pmlog⁡(1/pm).(2)h(r_m)\le h(p_m)+ C\left(q^{-1/2}+\frac{\sqrt q}{m}\right)p_m\log(1/p_m). \tag{2}

This tangent inequality also handles a conditional parameter above 1/21/2. For t=q/mt=q/m the needed bound is

pmlog⁡(1/pm)=log⁡(1+et)1+et≤C1+t1+et.p_m\log(1/p_m) =\frac{\log(1+e^t)}{1+e^t} \le C\frac{1+t}{1+e^t}.

The terms with coefficient q−1/2q^{-1/2} sum to O(n/q)O(n/\sqrt q), because plog⁡(1/p)p\log(1/p) is bounded. For the other terms,

∑m=1n(1+q/m)e−q/mm=O(1+log⁡+(1/c))\sum_{m=1}^n\frac{(1+q/m)e^{-q/m}}m =O\bigl(1+\log_+(1/c)\bigr)

by (1) in moments, using r=1r=1 and qq times the r=2r=2 estimate. Subadditivity of conditional entropy and (2) thus give

H(Y∣E=0)≤H(Y)+O(q+nq+q(1+log⁡+(1/c)))=H(Y)+Ox0(n/q).(3)H(Y\mid E=0)\le H(Y)+ O\left(\sqrt q+\frac n{\sqrt q} +\sqrt q(1+\log_+(1/c))\right) =H(Y)+O_{x_0}(n/\sqrt q). \tag{3}

The last equality uses c≤C(x0)c\le C(x_0) and boundedness of c(1+log⁡+(1/c))c(1+\log_+(1/c)) on that range; the finite cutoff's rounding adds at most 1.

Since EE is determined by YY, the exact chain rule gives

H(Y)=h(a)+aH(Y∣E=1)+bH(Y∣E=0).H(Y)=h(a)+aH(Y\mid E=1)+bH(Y\mid E=0).

Insert (3), use h(a)≤1h(a)\le1 and a≥1/3a\ge1/3, and rearrange: H(Y∣E=1)≥H(Y)−O(n/q)H(Y\mid E=1)\ge H(Y)-O(n/\sqrt q). Finally n/q=n/cn/\sqrt q=\sqrt{n/c} and H(Y)=Hn(x)H(Y)=\mathcal H_n(x).