Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


For n≥1n\ge1 and 0<x<Hn/20<x<H_n/2, the unique optimizer in definitions is

pm=11+ecn/m,Fn(c):=∑m=1n1m(1+ecn/m)=x,p_m=\frac1{1+e^{cn/m}},\qquad F_n(c):=\sum_{m=1}^n\frac1{m(1+e^{cn/m})}=x,

with a unique c=cx,n>0c=c_{x,n}>0. At x=0x=0 the optimizer is all zero; for x≥Hn/2x\ge H_n/2 it is all 1/21/2.

Fix x0>0x_0>0 and 0<δ<10<\delta<1. Uniformly for

x0≤x≤1−δ2log⁡nx_0\le x\le\frac{1-\delta}{2}\log n

and sufficiently large n=n(x0,δ)n=n(x_0,\delta),

n−1+δ/2≤c≤C(x0),c≍x0,δe−2x,cn≥nδ/2,n^{-1+\delta/2}\le c\le C(x_0),\qquad c\asymp_{x_0,\delta}e^{-2x},\qquad cn\ge n^{\delta/2},

and, with the continuous multiplier and exponent,

∣log⁡(c/λx)∣=Ox0((cn)−1),Hn(x)n=cx+Ox0((cn)−1).\left|\log(c/\lambda_x)\right|=O_{x_0}((cn)^{-1}),\qquad \frac{\mathcal H_n(x)}n=c_x+O_{x_0}((cn)^{-1}).

Source: published PDF, pp. 3–4, Lemma 2. The proof uses strict concavity, correcting the printed “strongly convex.” The printed multiplier comparison is not uniform down to x=0x=0: for fixed nn, cx,n→∞c_{x,n}\to\infty there. The positive lower bound x0x_0 is essential for the estimates, and is available in Theorem 4. The growing-range Riemann estimates below expand the source's compact-range argument; no discrete slab is assumed nonempty.

Bears on. Problem 297.

Proof

FnF_n is continuous and strictly decreasing from Hn/2H_n/2 to 0 on [0,∞)[0,\infty). This proves the existence and uniqueness of cc in the stated open range. For the corresponding pmp_m,

h′(pm)=log⁡21−pmpm=cnmlog⁡2.h'(p_m)=\log_2\frac{1-p_m}{p_m}=\frac{cn}{m\log2}.

For any feasible vector (rm)(r_m), the supporting-tangent inequality for strictly concave hh gives

∑mh(rm)≤∑mh(pm)+cnlog⁡2(∑mrm/m−x)≤∑mh(pm).\sum_mh(r_m)\le\sum_mh(p_m) +\frac{cn}{\log2}\left(\sum_m r_m/m-x\right) \le\sum_mh(p_m).

Strict concavity forces equality only at the displayed vector, including competitors on the boundary of the cube. The two endpoint regimes follow directly from positivity of 1/m1/m and the unique maximum h(1/2)=1h(1/2)=1.

Put ϕc(y)=1/[y(1+ec/y)]\phi_c(y)=1/[y(1+e^{c/y})] for y>0y>0, with ϕc(0)=0\phi_c(0)=0. As a function of t=c/yt=c/y, it is c−1t/(1+et)c^{-1}t/(1+e^t). The derivative of t/(1+et)t/(1+e^t) has numerator 1+et(1−t)1+e^t(1-t), strictly decreasing for t>0t>0 from 2 to −∞-\infty. Thus this function is unimodal with bounded maximum; the total variation of ϕc\phi_c on [0,1][0,1] is O(1/c)O(1/c). For a bounded-variation function, comparing the value at each right endpoint of an interval of length 1/n1/n with its integral gives error at most its variation on that interval divided by nn. Summing gives

∣Fn(c)−F(c)∣≤C/(cn).(1)|F_n(c)-F(c)|\le C/(cn). \tag{1}

Take c∗=n−1+δ/2c_*=n^{-1+\delta/2}. The formula for FF in entropy_exponent gives Fn(c∗)=(1/2−δ/4)log⁡n+O(1)F_n(c_*)=(1/2-\delta/4)\log n+O(1), which exceeds the allowed upper value of xx for large nn. Monotonicity implies c≥c∗c\ge c_*. Choose a fixed C0=C0(x0)C_0=C_0(x_0) with F(C0)<x0/2F(C_0)<x_0/2. Equation (1) makes Fn(C0)<x0F_n(C_0)<x_0 for large nn, so c≤C0c\le C_0. Now (1) has error O(n−δ/2)O(n^{-\delta/2}).

On 0<c≤C00<c\le C_0, the quantity F(c)−12log⁡(1/c)F(c)-\frac12\log(1/c) is bounded: use its expansion near zero and continuity away from zero. Hence x=12log⁡(1/c)+Ox0(1)x=\frac12\log(1/c)+O_{x_0}(1) and c≍x0,δe−2xc\asymp_{x_0,\delta}e^{-2x}.

Both cc and λx\lambda_x have a common fixed upper bound depending on x0x_0. Since

dF(c)dlog⁡c=−11+ec,\frac{dF(c)}{d\log c}=-\frac1{1+e^c},

its magnitude is bounded away from zero on their intervening range. The mean value theorem and (1) give ∣log⁡(c/λx)∣=Ox0((cn)−1)|\log(c/\lambda_x)|=O_{x_0}((cn)^{-1}).

Finally gc(y)=h((1+ec/y)−1)g_c(y)=h((1+e^{c/y})^{-1}), with gc(0)=0g_c(0)=0, increases in yy and lies in [0,1][0,1]. Its Riemann error is at most 1/n1/n. For t=c/yt=c/y,

∂gc(y)∂log⁡c=−t2et(1+et)2log⁡2,\frac{\partial g_c(y)}{\partial\log c} =-\frac{t^2e^t}{(1+e^t)^2\log2},

which is uniformly bounded for t≥0t\ge0. Comparing its integrals at cc and λx\lambda_x therefore costs Ox0((cn)−1)O_{x_0}((cn)^{-1}). The error 1/n1/n is of the same order because c≤C0c\le C_0. This proves the entropy approximation uniformly.