Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Elsholtz 2016 egyptian fractions odd denominators

../

corollary_1_2: States the doubly exponential lower bound exp(exp(c k / log k)) for the number of representations of 1 by k distinct odd unit fractions, k odd and large, as the P = 2 case of Theorem 1.1.

theorem_1_1: For squarefree P and k large (k odd when P is even), the number of representations of 1 by k distinct unit fractions with denominators congruent to plus or minus 1 modulo P is at least exp(exp(c(P) k / log k)).


Christian Elsholtz, Egyptian fractions with odd denominators, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics 67 (2016), no. 3, 425--430, doi:10.1093/qmath/haw020 (published online 28 June 2016); preprint arXiv:1606.02117.

The copy read for this card is the arXiv version v1 (7 June 2016, the only arXiv version), nine physical pages numbered 1--9: the arXiv:1606.02117v1 PDF (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.02117v1); 107,870 bytes. The journal version was not obtained and has not been compared with the preprint; the locators below are the preprint's page numbers and labels. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1606.02117), every other right reserved.

Read status: the statements consumed by the corpus, Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.2 (pp. 2--3), and the paper's restatement (1.2) of the earlier bounds (p. 2), were read clause by clause on the PDF pages (claims checked). The proof in Section 2 (pp. 3--7) was read for its structure and is summarized on the Theorem 1.1 page; no proof was rewritten and none has been independently reviewed.

Contents

  • Section 1 (pp. 1--3) reviews the unrestricted count. With Xk={(x1,…,xk):∑1/xi=1, 0<x1<⋯<xk}\mathcal X_k=\{(x_1,\ldots,x_k):\sum 1/x_i=1,\ 0<x_1<\cdots<x_k\}, display (1.2) on p. 2 restates the known bounds as $\exp(\exp(((\log2)(\log3)+o(1)),k/\log k))\le|\mathcal X_k|\le c_0^{(5/3+\varepsilon)2^{k-3}}$, crediting the lower bound to Konyagin and the upper bound to Browning and Elsholtz, with "c0=1.264…c_0=1.264\ldots is lim⁡n→∞un1/2n\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}u_n^{1/2^n}, un=1u_n=1 [sic], un+1=un(un+1)u_{n+1}=u_n(u_n+1)". One constant in this restatement does not match the primary source as its card records it: Konyagin's Theorem 1 has the factor 13\tfrac13 in the double exponent (((ln⁡2)(ln⁡3)/3+o(1)) n/ln⁡n((\ln2)(\ln3)/3+o(1))\,n/\ln n; see its page). No mismatch is found for c0c_0, though Browning and Elsholtz's paper itself was not read. The printed "un=1u_n=1" does not say where the sequence 1,2,6,42,1806,…1,2,6,42,1806,\ldots starts, and from u1=1u_1=1 the limit lim⁡un2−n\lim u_n^{2^{-n}} is the printed 1.264…1.264\ldots (the Vardi constant). That is the normalization in which Elsholtz and Planitzer (arXiv:1805.02945v1, p. 1) state Browning and Elsholtz's bound, as c0(5/24+ε)2kc_0^{(5/24+\varepsilon)2^k} with c0=1.264…c_0=1.264\ldots and u1=1u_1=1, which is the bound in (1.2), since (5/3)2k−3=(5/24)2k(5/3)2^{k-3}=(5/24)2^k. From u0=1u_0=1, the indexing of Remark 3 of Elsholtz and Planitzer's 2021 paper, the limit is the square 1.5979…1.5979\ldots instead. The section also recalls Sierpiński's existence result for odd denominators, the exact counts for k=9k=9 (five solutions) and k=11k=11 (379,118 solutions), and the earlier lower bound 2 k2(1+o(1))\sqrt2^{\,k^2(1+o(1))} of Chen, Elsholtz and Jiang for odd denominators.
  • Theorem 1.1 (pp. 2--3): for a squarefree P=p1⋯psP=p_1\cdots p_s and kk sufficiently large (kk odd when PP is even), the number of representations 1=∑i=1k1/xi1=\sum_{i=1}^k1/x_i with distinct positive xi≡±1(modP)x_i\equiv\pm1\pmod P is at least exp⁡(exp⁡(c(P) k/log⁡k))\exp(\exp(c(P)\,k/\log k)) for some c(P)>0c(P)>0.
  • Corollary 1.2 (p. 3): the case P=2P=2, distinct odd denominators and odd kk. The paper adds (p. 3) that an upper bound of the form exp⁡(exp⁡(c2k))\exp(\exp(c_2k)) follows from the unrestricted bound (1.2); the abstract (p. 1) states both bounds for the odd-denominator count S(k)S(k), kk odd.
  • Section 2 (pp. 3--7): the proof, from a Bang--Zsigmondy divisor count (Lemma 2.1), Wigert's divisor bound (Lemma 2.2), van Albada and van Lint's theorem that every positive integer is a finite sum of distinct unit fractions from any arithmetic progression (Lemma 2.3, giving Lemma 2.4), a binary-expansion construction reaching a fraction 1/(Pt−1)1/(P^t-1), and the divisor-splitting identity of Lemma 2.5. Remark 2.6 says the constant c(P)c(P) was not worked out.

Compiled scope

Statements only. The construction is recorded as a sketch on the Theorem 1.1 page; the paper's lemmas and the parity argument for the necessity of odd kk when PP is even were read but not checked step by step. Nothing in the paper decides a catalog problem's status: for Problem 148 it gives an independent doubly exponential lower bound for a restricted count, which together with the monotonicity of the unrestricted count in kk bounds F(k)F(k) from below with an unspecified constant.

Bears on. #148 (Theorem 1.1 at P=2P=2, that is Corollary 1.2: a lower bound exp⁡(exp⁡(ck/log⁡k))\exp(\exp(ck/\log k)) for the number of representations of 11 by kk distinct odd unit fractions, kk odd and large, a subset of the solutions F(k)F(k) counts; with Konyagin's monotonicity inequality it bounds F(k)F(k) from below for all large kk, with an unspecified constant).

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.