Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. J. Koizumi, Irrationality of the reciprocal sum of doubly exponential sequences, arXiv:2504.05933v1 (8 April 2025); Remark 22 on p. 13, Example 11 on p. 8. Published as Integers 26 (2026), paper A28, where they are Remark 4 (p. 16) and Example 1 (p. 10). The editions are identified on the source card.
Read depth. Claims checked: the remark and Example 11 were read clause by clause on the page images of both editions. The transcendence of is the paper's citation of Dubickas and was not checked here; nothing here is independently reviewed.
Statement
For a positive integer , Example 11 (p. 8) defines and , the pseudo-greedy expansion of , and cites the constant with (ratio tending to ), shown irrational by Wagner and Ziegler and transcendental by Dubickas.
Remark 22 (p. 13). Suppose Question 5 has an affirmative answer, equivalently that Conjecture 6 holds. Then the exceptional set of Theorem 4 is
so every real algebraic lies in ; in particular would be a Type 2 irrationality sequence.
Proof pointer
Page 13. If has rational reciprocal sum, the assumed answer makes the sequence eventually follow , so for some and , and . The transcendence of makes every such transcendental.
Dependencies
Theorem 16 and Theorem 4 of the same paper; A. Dubickas, Ramanujan J. 57 (2022), 569--581, for the transcendence of , as the paper cites it (not held here).
Bears on
- Problem 263: a conditional implication. An affirmative answer to the question of Problem 243 would answer the first question of Problem 263 affirmatively; the remark proves nothing unconditionally, and says nothing on the second question.
- Problem 243: the remark records a consequence of an affirmative answer, not progress on the question.