Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 263
claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 263, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. Let be an increasing sequence of positive integers such that for every sequence of positive integers with the sum
is irrational. Is such a sequence? Must such a sequence satisfy ?
Status. Open. The site labels the problem OPEN (page last edited 2026-04-02). Its two questions are the problem's two parts. The second, whether an irrationality sequence of this kind must satisfy , has one pending partial claim, [[problems/irrationality/E0263/claims/2026_05_09_price|a disproof of the growth question posted in 2026]], which asserts a counterexample. The first, whether is such a sequence, has no claim.
Source. erdosproblems.com/263, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #263, https://www.erdosproblems.com/263.
References.
- [Ko25c] J. Koizumi, Irrationality of the reciprocal sum of doubly exponential sequences. arXiv:2504.05933 (2025).
- [KoTa24] Kovač, V. and Tao, T., On several irrationality problems for Ahmes series. arXiv:2406.17593 (2024); Acta Math. Hungar. 175 (2025), 572–608.
Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures (pinned at the repository's commit of 2026-09-18).
Current assessment
The site records Problem 263 as OPEN (page last edited 2026-04-02). On that date the site added the hypothesis that the sequence be increasing, which Erdős's formulation carries: a DeepMind prover agent had posted on 2026-02-27 (post) a Lean disproof of the second question for the statement without that hypothesis, the sequence except on a sparse set of indices. That counterexample is not increasing and refutes only the superseded statement, so it is not a claim on the current problem; the site's remarks credit it, and the formal-conjectures catalog preserves its formal proof at the commit before the correction. For the corrected statement, the one pending claim is a claimed disproof of the second question recorded on the Price claim page, an increasing sequence that GPT-5.5 Pro is said to have found as a counterexample; the first question has no claim, and the catalog's file at its commit of 2026-09-18 tags both questions research open. The Progress note below records Koizumi's theorem and Kovač and Tao's theorem and why neither settles a question; the corpus records no check of their proofs and no literature search beyond the cited sources and the site's threads.
Progress
Koizumi's Theorem 4 proves that, for all real outside a countable set, all positive-integer sequences asymptotic to have irrational reciprocal sums. This does not resolve the specified base or the growth question in the statement.
Kovač and Tao's Theorem 2.4 (Acta Math. Hungar. 175 (2025), 572--608; card), which the site's remarks credit, proves that no strictly increasing sequence with convergent reciprocal sum and is an irrationality sequence of this kind. It settles neither question. The sequence has , and the theorem says nothing about sequences whose ratio does not tend to , such as the claimed counterexample. So it has no claim page.
Known Results
The second question has a claimed negative answer. Liam Price posted in the problem's discussion thread on 2026-05-09 that GPT-5.5 Pro disproves it, with a write-up and a Lean file auto-formalized with Aristotle and cleaned up with Claude Opus 4.7: a strictly increasing sequence, built from blocks of consecutive integers, that is an irrationality sequence in the problem's sense yet has . Nat Sothanaphan replied the same day that a standard check found no issues and that the Lean matched the paper; that is a forum remark, not acceptance, and the site's label is OPEN. The claim page records the posting.
Three forum proof claims by T. Alexander Lystad, posted on
2026-08-01
and on 2026-08-02
(claim 179
and
claim 181),
have no claim page: they are Lean 4 developments generated with Kimi K3 under
his direction, archived on Zenodo, of the folklore sufficient criteria for
being an irrationality sequence, and they settle no instance of either
question, as the claimant states. The first claims that a strictly increasing
sequence with for all large is an
irrationality sequence in the problem's sense, the consequence of the folklore
result the site's remarks state; has and misses
the hypothesis by the . The other two claim that every sequence of
positive integers with has irrational reciprocal sum,
first for monotone sequences after Erdős's 1975 argument and then without
monotonicity by sorting the sequence; the claimant's write-up PROOF-1975.md
(at its commit of 2026-08-02) covers only the monotone step, and the claimant
notes that the
analogue fails without monotonicity, an interleaved Sylvester construction
having and sum . The repository's adapter to
the formal-conjectures catalog's variant folklore was produced by Codex
Proof Forge, as its README says. In the thread Vjekoslav Kovač remarked on
2026-08-02 that Badea's criterion (the main Theorem of the 1987 paper, Theorem A
of the 1993 paper; on the cards
badea_1987_irrationality_certain_infinite_series
and
badea_1993_theorem_irrationality_infinite_series_applications)
is a stronger classical criterion of the first kind, and on 2026-08-03 that
the Erdős paper the claimant cites already has a non-monotone form of the
second. The catalog's file for the problem at its commit of 2026-09-18 states
the first criterion twice, both tagged research solved: in a form,
citing Folklore.lean of the claimant's repository at an earlier commit as
its formal proof, and in the eventual form that matches the claim, citing no
proof; its variant folklore states the second criterion without a proof
link. The catalog links proofs without refereeing them.
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.
- badea_1987_irrationality_certain_infinite_series
- badea_1987_irrationality_certain_infinite_series / theorem
- kovac_2024_several_irrationality_problems_ahmes_series
- koizumi_2025_irrationality_reciprocal_sum_doubly_exponential_sequences
- koizumi_2025_irrationality_reciprocal_sum_doubly_exponential_sequences / remark_22
- koizumi_2025_irrationality_reciprocal_sum_doubly_exponential_sequences / theorem_1
- koizumi_2025_irrationality_reciprocal_sum_doubly_exponential_sequences / theorem_4