Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 330

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 330, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Does there exist a minimal basis with positive density, say A⊂NA\subset\mathbb{N}, such that for any n∈An\in A the (upper) density of integers which cannot be represented without using nn is positive?

Formulation. The site reads the "positive density" of AA as positive upper density, which its commentary says Erdős most likely meant. In [Er80], Erdős allows lower or upper density for the integers that need a fixed element, and puts no density condition on AA. The standing concerns this reading, with the order of the basis unrestricted. Asking for positive lower or natural density of AA is a stronger question, which the accepted construction does not address.

Status. PROVED (LEAN), the site's label. The standing rests on one accepted claim page, the AI-generated construction of 2026, accepted on the site's relabeling of 2026-05-11; the checks posted on the thread were ChatGPT runs, and there is no refereed publication. The label's Lean qualification dates from 2026-05-11, after the first outside formalization was announced (2026-05-05); a single-file vendoring of it followed; neither is built or audited in this corpus, and both are linked from the claim page.

Source. erdosproblems.com/330, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #330, https://www.erdosproblems.com/330.

References.

  • [Er80] Erdős, Paul, A survey of problems in combinatorial number theory. Ann. Discrete Math. (1980), 89-115.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures.

Current assessment

Accepted on the site's acceptance of an AI-generated construction, with no refereed publication. The site formulation quoted above (page last edited 2026-05-11) asks for a minimal basis of positive density in which every element is needed by a set of integers of positive upper density; the site reads "positive density" as positive upper density, and the claim page [[problems/additive_bases/E0330/claims/2026_04_24_turturean|Turturean 2026]] records the construction under that reading, for order two. The acceptance evidence is the site's relabeling alone, since the checks posted on the thread linked ChatGPT transcripts; two outside Lean developments formalize the upper-density, order-two statement and are not built or audited in this corpus. The historical ErGr80 formulation on printed p. 50, checked below, is provenance, not a solution. One earlier claim was withdrawn: the thread opens (2025-12-19) with a pointer to ByteDance's Seed-Prover 1.5 technical report, whose upload of that day listed Problem 330 among the problems the system solved; the statement it had searched was the site's earlier misstated formulation, corrected on the site and in formal-conjectures in early December 2025, and the team wrote on the thread on 2025-12-21 that the entry was a typo and that they do not prove the problem, removing it from the report's revision of that day. No proof was posted, and the withdrawn listing gets no claim page.

Dated search scope (2026-10-07): the site's problem page and discussion thread (24 comments, from 2025-12-19), the community database (status proved (Lean), 2026-05-11) and the formal-conjectures statement file (tagged research solved, with its proof link). Not searched: arXiv, MathSciNet and zbMATH; no independent proof review is recorded on this page.

Known Results

Historical formulation

Erdős and Graham's 1980 monograph, printed p. 50, attributes the question to Erdős and Nathanson. It asks whether a minimal basis of positive density can have, for each fixed element aka_k, positive upper density of integers that cannot be represented without using aka_k. This is direct historical provenance for the displayed question, not a solution.

The separate Er80 survey already cited above has different wording on printed p. 100 and does not require positive density of AA. The ErGr80 passage does not establish a proof or verify the exact formalized variant.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.