Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 350
claims/: The 2 claim pages of Problem 350, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. If is a finite set of integers which is dissociated (that is, all of the subset sums are distinct) then
Formulation. The site's wording on 2026-09-18 (the page shows no
last-edited date). "Dissociated" means that the subset sums, the
empty sum included, are pairwise distinct; a dissociated set contains no
(the sets and would share the sum ), so its elements
are integers , and the empty sum collides with nothing.
Theorem 1 of Benkoski and Erdős hypothesizes exactly this in the form "all the
sums , or , are distinct"
(subsets of correspond to the vectors ), and the
formal-conjectures predicate DecidableDistinctSubsetSums (",
, implies ") is the same condition;
the three conventions agree. The site's refinement
, which the site states to hold with equality exactly
for the set it writes as , is printed in the sources
as with equality only for ,
: the extremal set is the powers of two
, which the site's notation abbreviates.
Status. Proved. The statement is Theorem 1 of Benkoski and Erdős
(Math. Comp. 28 (1974), 617--623, refereed), whose proof the paper
credits to C. Ryavec and reproduces in full; the refinement
with the equality case is printed after the proof
(p. 619), and Erdős's 1975 and 1977 surveys restate the theorem as
Ryavec's proof of his February 1973 conjecture. The stronger bound
of Hanson, Steele and Stenger (Proc.
Amer. Math. Soc. 66 (1977), 179--180, refereed) is not held, and its
statement is quoted from the site and from the 1980 monograph. The
site's label is PROVED (LEAN); its Lean mark dates from Alexeev's Lean file
of 25 November 2025, and the formal-conjectures statement carries
formal_proof attributes pointing to two external Lean files, Alexeev's,
whose header credits the original proof to Ryavec, and a fork's proof added
in April 2026 under the catalog's docstring; both are described below,
and neither is Lean this corpus built. The claim pages are
Benkoski and Erdős
(Ryavec's proof; accepted on the refereed publication and the site's
credit; the two Lean developments are its formalization links) and
Hanson, Steele and Stenger
(the stronger bound; accepted on the refereed publication, the note not
held).
Source. erdosproblems.com/350, accessed 2026-09-18: the problem page (labeled PROVED (LEAN), its status note recording an affirmative solution with a proof verified in Lean; no last-edited date; source keys [Er75b], [Er77c], [ErGr80, p. 60]; commentary citing [BeEr74] and [HSS77], "See also [1]" and the formal-conjectures link; a thanks line naming one contributor; indicator "Formalised statement? Yes"), its three-comment discussion thread (25--26 November 2025) and its empty proof-claim tab. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #350, https://www.erdosproblems.com/350, accessed 2026-09-18.
References.
- [BeEr74] Benkoski, S. J. and Erdős, P., On weird and pseudoperfect numbers. Math. Comp. 28 (1974), no. 126, 617--623, doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1974-0347726-9 (Crossref record). Theorem 1, p. 617, proof pp. 617--619, the refinement p. 619; Theorem 2, p. 619. Library home: benkoski_1974_weird_pseudoperfect_numbers; result pages Theorem 1 and Theorem 2.
- [HSS77] Hanson, F., Steele, J. M. and Stenger, F., Distinct sums over subsets. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 66 (1977), no. 1, 179--180, doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1977-0447167-4 (Crossref record; its deposited abstract reads "A finite set of integers with distinct subset sums has a precisely bounded Dirichlet series"). Not held. The statement is quoted from [ErGr80], p. 60, and the site.
- [Er75b] Erdős, P., Problems and results in combinatorial number theory. Journées Arithmétiques de Bordeaux (1974), Astérisque 24--25 (1975), 295--310; Chapter II, printed p. 302. Library home: erdos_1975_problems_results_combinatorial_number_theory.
- [Er77c] Erdős, P., Problems and results on combinatorial number theory. III. Number theory day (Rockefeller Univ., 1976), Lecture Notes in Math. 626, Springer (1977), 43--72; Section 4, printed p. 52. Library home: erdos_1977_problems_results_combinatorial_number_theory_iii.
- [ErGr80] Erdős, P. and Graham, R. L., Old and new problems and results in combinatorial number theory. Monographies de L'Enseignement Mathématique 28, Université de Genève (1980); printed p. 60. Library home: erdos_1980_old_new_problems_results_combinatorial_number_theory.
Formalization. The site's Lean mark is a catalog label; see
"Formalization and the Lean label" below for the two external files. The file
ErdosProblems/350.lean
of formal-conjectures at its main-branch commit of 2026-09-18 declares
erdos_350 (A : Finset ℕ) (hA : DecidableDistinctSubsetSums A) : ∑ n ∈ A, (1 / n : ℝ) < 2
under category research solved with proof sorry and two formal_proof
attributes, one naming src/v4.24.0/ErdosProblems/Erdos350.lean on the
main branch of plby/lean-proofs and one naming
FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/350.lean#L226 of the fork
XC0R/formal-conjectures at its fixed commit of 13 April 2026; the
docstring of erdos_350 says that the problem was formalized in Lean by
Alexeev using Aristotle. The variant erdos_350.variants.strengthening
(the Hanson--Steele--Stenger bound for real , its docstring crediting
Hanson, Steele and Stenger and noting that is excluded because the
right side would be infinite) is research solved with proof sorry and
no formal_proof attribute. The community database on 2026-09-18 lists
the problem as "proved (Lean)", its entry last updated on 25 November 2025,
with formal_status Lean, the statement formalized since 31 August 2025,
and no formal-proof URL. Neither external file is Lean this corpus built.
Current assessment
The question (site formulation of 2026-09-18). The statement above; PROVED (LEAN); no last-edited date. The commentary credits the proof to Ryavec, who seems never to have published it, says that his proof is reproduced in [BeEr74] and delivers the refinement with equality exactly for the powers of two (written there as ), records the stronger bound for all as proved by Hanson, Steele and Stenger [HSS77], points to Problem 1, and notes the formal-conjectures formalization. The thread: on 25 November 2025 the author of the external Lean file announced a Lean formalization of a solution, with a link to the repository and to an online type-checker, describing the pipeline (ChatGPT wrote out a proof, Aristotle formalized the resulting text into Lean, the theorem statement was taken from the formal-conjectures file, the result was checked by the poster) and its running times, and adding that the site had been updated in response; two comments of 26 November 2025 concern the tooling's supervision and are not mathematical. The proof-claim tab is empty. The community database says proved (Lean).
The origin. [Er75b], p. 302, in Chapter II: "In February 1973, I conjectured that if is such that all the sums , or are all distinct, then: and the maximum is attained if and only if . Ryavec found a simple analytic proof and recently E. and G. Szekeres found an elementary proof." [Er77c], p. 52: "I conjectured and Ryavec and others proved that if is a sequence of integers such that all the sums , or are all distinct then equality if and only if ." [ErGr80], p. 60: "It was conjectured by Erdös and proved by C. Ryavec that if is a set of integers with all subset sums distinct (i.e., ) then . This was recently strengthened by Hanson, Steele and Stenger [Hanson-St-St (77)] who showed for all real ." The Szekeres proof mentioned in 1975 was not located.
Status-defining source. Theorem 1 of [BeEr74] (printed p. 617): "Let be a set of integers for which all the sums , or , are distinct. Then ." The paper conjectured it in the divisor setting (property P: all sums of distinct divisors of distinct, hence ) and credits "the simple and ingenious proof" to C. Ryavec. The proof (pp. 617--619): from the distinctness of the subset sums, for ; taking logarithms, dividing by and integrating over , then substituting term by term, gives , that is . The refinement (p. 619): "The same argument can be used to show that if the sums are all distinct, then and equality holds only if , "; the powers of two attain the bound, since . Read depth: claims checked for Theorem 1 and the refinement; the one-page proof for its structure only. Acceptance evidence: the refereed publication (Mathematics of Computation, received 28 June 1973, issued April 1974) and the curator's credit on the site. Erdős's restatements of 1975, 1977 and 1980 are the author's own and are context, and the two external Lean files below are third-party Lean, not evidence.
The stronger statement (not held). Hanson, Steele and Stenger's , quoted from [ErGr80], p. 60 ("for all real "; at the right side is not finite and the inequality is empty, which is why the formal-conjectures variant takes ) and from the site; at it is the theorem above. The paper is a two-page note in a refereed journal (volume 66 per the Crossref record, not the "63" of some catalogs); no page of this wiki records its argument.
Formalization and the Lean label. The site's Lean mark dates from 25
November 2025, the day Alexeev announced his file; it is a catalog label
attached to the formal-conjectures statement, which has a sorry body and
points to two external developments, described at the commits named below
and neither built by this corpus.
plby/lean-proofs,src/v4.24.0/ErdosProblems/Erdos350.lean, on the branchmain, at its head of 2026-09-15 (the commit the link on the claim page pins); the file has 16,331 bytes and 239 lines. Its header says it formalizes "a solution to Erdős Problem 350", that "The original human proof was found by: Ryavec", cites [BeEr74], states that ChatGPT (OpenAI) "explained some proof of this result (not necessarily the original human proof, instead prioritizing clarity)" and that the resulting text "was auto-formalized into Lean by Aristotle from Harmonic", that the theorem statement is from the Formal Conjectures project, and that the proof is verified by Lean with toolchainleanprover/lean4:v4.24.0. It imports Mathlib, definesHasDistinctSubsetSumsand a sequence form, provessum_ge_two_pow_sub_one(the smallest elements sum to at least ),sum_inv_le_sum_inv_of_sum_ge,reciprocal_sum_lt_two(the rational sum of reciprocals of a set of positive integers with distinct subset sums is less than ) and finallyerdos_350in the formal-conjectures form, deriving positivity of the elements from the distinctness hypothesis. The file contains nosorry, noaxiomdeclaration, nonative_decideand no#print axiomsline.XC0R/formal-conjecturesat its fixed commit of 13 April 2026 (the commit the catalog's attribute and the claim page's link pin),FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/350.lean(16,626 bytes, 337 lines): a fork of the collection's file in whicherdos_350(line 226) is proved in place from three private lemmas,partial_sum_ge_pow(the same count),abel_partial_sum_boundandsum_inv_le_of_partial_sum_ge(an Abel-summation comparison), followed by the geometric series ; the file carries the catalog's docstring unchanged, Alexeev credit included; the onlysorryin the file is thestrengtheningvariant (line 335), and there is noaxiomdeclaration.
Both developments formalize the counting route (the smallest elements
of a set with distinct subset sums sum to at least , so the
reciprocal sum is at most ), not Ryavec's product and
integral argument; no statement-fidelity review of either exists, and
neither is Lean this corpus built, so no formalized evidence is listed.
Alexeev's file declares itself a formalization of a solution whose
original human proof is Ryavec's, and the fork proves the catalog's
statement in place under the catalog's docstring, which credits Ryavec,
so both are recorded as formalization links on
the Benkoski--Erdős page
rather than as claims of their own. The site's thread attributes the first
file's construction to an AI pipeline checked by its poster; this is
recorded as the poster's own account.
Neighbor. Problem 1, the site's "See also", asks how large the largest element of a dissociated -set must be; it is disproved on its assessed page. The reciprocal sum here is bounded regardless of that growth.
Search scope. None of the following found a dispute of Theorem 1, a copy of [HSS77], or any change of status.
- The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab; the community database record; the formal-conjectures file at the pinned commit and the two external files at the commits above.
- The primary sources: [BeEr74] pp. 617--620; [Er75b] p. 302, [Er77c] p. 52 and [ErGr80] p. 60.
- Crossref: the records of [BeEr74] and [HSS77] (the latter found by a bibliographic query). OpenAlex: the 28 works citing [BeEr74] (by title: [HSS77], later notes on subset-sum-distinct sequences (1998, 2000, 2002, 2003) and papers on weird and pseudoperfect numbers; none disputes Theorem 1). The AMS archive page of [HSS77].
- arXiv API: the search
(abs:dissociated OR abs:"distinct subset sums") AND abs:reciprocal(9 records, none relevant).
Not searched: MathSciNet, zbMATH, Google Scholar, X. Not held: [HSS77], the Szekeres proof of 1975 (no reference given), Ryavec's own text (the site says none was published).
Remaining gaps. (1) [HSS77] is not held; its statement is quoted second-hand. (2) The proof of Theorem 1 is claims checked only; the two Lean developments are not built. (3) The Szekeres elementary proof mentioned in 1975 is untraced. Nothing else is open for this statement.
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.