Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. There are finite additive -bases of positive elements whose range, the largest with , is at least (equation (3), printed p. 118, derived from the basis of p. 121 with the parameters of p. 123). In the notation of Problem 791, with the largest range of a -basis of elements and , the construction gives for all large (counting the zero element changes by one), so for large the integer has , hence and , so
and the question whether has the answer no. Rohrbach's conjecture , of which the site's question is the asymptotic form, is refuted with it. A. Mrose, Untere Schranken für die Reichweiten von Extremalbasen fester Ordnung, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 48 (1979), no. 1, 118--124, cited as [Mr79] on the problem page. Library home mrose_1979_untere_schranken_reichweiten_extremalbasen_fester_ordnung; result page Equation (3). Mrose's counts the positive elements, so his is the that Kohonen quotes for him. Hämmerer and Hofmeister refuted the guess independently and earlier in print, with the constant (their claim page); Mrose's paper does not cite them. Kohonen's basis raises the constant to (his claim page), the best upper bound for the estimate.
Covers. The "in particular" question only: is false. Not covered: the estimate of , which the problem page records as open between .
Depends on.
Acceptance. Refereed: the paper is the publisher's version of record in the
Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg, received 25
April 1975 and published in April 1979 (Crossref: published in print 1979-04,
online 1979-04-01), which dates this page. The site's curator, Thomas F. Bloom,
credits the disproof of to Mrose in the problem page's
commentary (label OPEN, page last edited 24 September 2025); the problem is not
marked settled there, so the credit is recorded here and is not listed as
reviewed. Kohonen's paper (p. 1) restates Mrose's bound as the previous
record, a citation and not a review. Equation (3), the basis and Satz 2
are checked at statement depth; the parameter optimization behind (3) is not
printed, and the proof is not reviewed in this corpus.