Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 516

../

claims/: The 3 claim pages of Problem 516, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let f(z)=∑k≥1akznkf(z)=\sum_{k\geq 1}a_k z^{n_k} be an entire function of finite order such that lim⁡nk/k=∞\lim n_k/k=\infty. Let $M(r)=\max_{\lvert z\rvert=r}\lvert f(z)\rvert$ and $m(r)=\min_{\lvert z\rvert=r}\lvert f(z)\rvert$. Is it true that

lim sup⁡log⁡m(r)log⁡M(r)=1?\limsup\frac{\log m(r)}{\log M(r)}=1?

Status. PROVED (LEAN). The site labels the problem PROVED (LEAN) (page last edited 28 December 2025) and credits Fuchs [Fu63] with the affirmative solution; the Lean qualifier refers to a proof in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs repository that has not been built here (see Formalization). The accepted claim page Fuchs 1963 records the result, on the refereed venue and the site's acceptance, and carries the formalization link; the frontmatter standing derives from it. Two earlier refereed results settle subclasses and are accepted partial claims: [[problems/analysis/E0516/claims/1954_12_01_erdos_macintyre|Erdős and Macintyre 1954]] and Kővári 1965.

Source. erdosproblems.com/516, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #516, https://www.erdosproblems.com/516.

References.

  • [Er61] Erdős, Paul, Some unsolved problems. Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Közl. (1961), 221-254.
  • [ErMa54] Erdős, P. and Macintyre, A. J., Integral functions with gap power series. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. (2) (1954), 62-70.
  • [Fu63] Fuchs, W. H. J., Proof of a conjecture of G. Pólya concerning gap series. Illinois J. Math. (1963), 661-667.
  • [Ko65] Kövari, Thomas, A gap-theorem for entire functions of infinite order. Michigan Math. J. (1965), 133-140.
  • [Ma52] Macintyre, A. J., Asymptotic paths of integral functions with gap power series. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) (1952), 286-296.
  • [Po29] Pólya, G., Untersuchungen über Lücken und Singularitäten von Potenzreihen. Math. Z. (1929), 549-640.
  • [Wi14] Wiman, A., Über den Zusammenhang Zwischen dem Maximalbetrage Einer Analytischen Funktion und dem Grössten Gliede der Zugehörigen Taylor'schen Reihe. Acta Math. (1914), 305-326.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures, linked at its revision of 6 October 2026, whose main theorem is marked solved with its proof left open and points to a Lean proof in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs repository (Lean 4.33.0 with Mathlib) that names Fuchs as its informal author and Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol as its formal authors. Neither file has been built or audited in this repository; the claim page records the link and the standing rests on the paper.

Current assessment

The question is Pólya's [Po29]: for an entire function of finite order whose exponents are sparse in the sense nk/k→∞n_k/k\to\infty, is the minimum modulus as large as the maximum modulus on a logarithmic scale along some sequence of radii? The site's formulation of 2026-09-04 defines m(r)m(r) as the minimum modulus on ∣z∣=r\lvert z\rvert=r; in [Er61] the same question is written with m(r)m(r) the maximum term max⁡n∣anrn∣\max_n\lvert a_nr^n\rvert, and the site notes that with that reading the equality follows at once from Wiman's work [Wi14], while Erdős and Macintyre [ErMa54], like Pólya, used the minimum modulus. The page's standing concerns the minimum-modulus question. Its answer is yes, by Fuchs [Fu63], accepted here on the refereed publication and the site's credit and recorded on the claim page Fuchs 1963. The statement of [ErMa54] below follows its print, and the other statements follow the site's account and the publishers' records; no proof is reconstructed in this repository, no independent review is recorded, and the Lean proof named in Formalization has not been built or audited here. The status search covered the site, its forum thread and the community database on 2026-10-07; the thread holds no proof claim of this problem's question, and no other claim of the result was found.

The forum thread carries one formal result, posted 21 September 2026 by Kenta Kitamura with ChatGPT and OpenAI Codex (GPT-6 Astra) named as assistants: a Lean counterexample to the variant conjecture recorded below, in which the finite-order hypothesis is dropped and the gap condition is ∑1/nk<∞\sum 1/n_k<\infty (Fejér gaps), showing that the ratio log⁡m(r)/log⁡M(r)\log m(r)/\log M(r) can stay at most 1/21/2 for all large rr. The post itself says it leaves Fuchs's theorem untouched. It concerns that variant and not this problem's question, and it is a repository and a thread post rather than a dated manuscript, so it has no claim page here and is recorded only in this sentence.

Known Results

  • The site credits results of Wiman [Wi14] with lim sup⁡m(r)/M(r)=1\limsup m(r)/M(r)=1 whenever (nk+1−nk)2>nk(n_{k+1}-n_k)^2>n_k, the form in which [Er61] (IV.7.2) prints Pólya's condition. Erdős and Macintyre [ErMa54] state the remark, from the last sentence of Pólya [Po29], under the stronger condition lim inf⁡log⁡(nk+1−nk)/log⁡nk>1/2\liminf\log(n_{k+1}-n_k)/\log n_k>1/2, and note that it implies their own gap condition, so their Theorem 1 contains it. As the site prints it the condition is too weak: the squares nk=k2n_k=k^2 satisfy it and have ∑1/(nk+1−nk)=∞\sum1/(n_{k+1}-n_k)=\infty, so Theorem 2 of [ErMa54] gives an entire function with square exponents and lim sup⁡m(r)/M(r)≤1/2\limsup m(r)/M(r)\le1/2. This case has no claim page: as printed the statement is false, and in Pólya's form Theorem 1 of [ErMa54] contains it.
  • Erdős and Macintyre [ErMa54] prove lim sup⁡m(r)/M(r)=1\limsup m(r)/M(r)=1 whenever ∑k≥21/(nk+1−nk)<∞\sum_{k\ge2}1/(n_{k+1}-n_k)<\infty (Theorem 1, recorded on its library card; [Er61] restates it at IV.7.3 with the limit superior), show by example that this gap condition is sharp (Theorem 2), and add a finite-order criterion (Theorem 4). The convergence of that sum forces nk/k→∞n_k/k\to\infty, so Theorem 1 settles a subclass of the question: the accepted partial claim [[problems/analysis/E0516/claims/1954_12_01_erdos_macintyre|Erdős and Macintyre 1954]].
  • Fuchs [Fu63] answers the question: for finite order and nk/k→∞n_k/k\to\infty, log⁡m(r)>(1−ϵ)log⁡M(r)\log m(r)>(1-\epsilon)\log M(r) outside a set of radii of logarithmic density zero, for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0. This is the accepted claim Fuchs 1963.
  • Kővári [Ko65] shows that the lim sup⁡\limsup is 11 for an arbitrary entire function, of any order, under the stronger gap condition nk>k(log⁡k)2+cn_k>k(\log k)^{2+c} for some c>0c>0; on the finite-order functions with such exponents this is the accepted partial claim Kővári 1965. The site records the conjecture that ∑1/nk<∞\sum1/n_k<\infty should suffice here; a Lean counterexample posted to the thread in 2026, described in the assessment and not built or audited here, claims to refute that conjecture as stated. Macintyre [Ma52] shows the condition cannot be weakened past ∑1/nk<∞\sum1/n_k<\infty: whenever ∑1/nk=∞\sum1/n_k=\infty there is an entire function with those exponents tending to zero along the positive real axis.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.