Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 520

../

claims/: The 3 claim pages of Problem 520, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let ff be a Rademacher multiplicative function: a random {−1,0,1}\{-1,0,1\}-valued multiplicative function, where for each prime pp we independently choose f(p)∈{−1,1}f(p)\in \{-1,1\} uniformly at random, and for square-free integers nn we extend f(p1⋯pr)=f(p1)⋯f(pr)f(p_1\cdots p_r)=f(p_1)\cdots f(p_r) (and f(n)=0f(n)=0 if nn is not squarefree). Does there exist some constant c>0c>0 such that, almost surely,

lim sup⁡N→∞∑m≤Nf(m)Nlog⁡log⁡N=c?\limsup_{N\to \infty}\frac{\sum_{m\leq N}f(m)}{\sqrt{N\log\log N}}=c?

Status. The site labels the problem OPEN. The derived standing is solved with the claim disproved, through the self-contained Lean development submitted by Sigurd Høystad on 2026-08-04 (claim page): this corpus built the port of that development in plby/lean-proofs at its commit of 2026-09-15, written for Lean v4.33.0, and audited the port's two compared theorems, that almost surely ∑m≤Nf(m)/Nlog⁡log⁡N→0\sum_{m\le N}f(m)/\sqrt{N\log\log N}\to0 and that no constant c>0c>0 is almost surely the limit superior in the question. Two further full claims assert the same sharpening of Caich's almost sure bound to ∑m≤Nf(m)≪N(log⁡log⁡N)1/4+ε\sum_{m\le N}f(m)\ll\sqrt N(\log\log N)^{1/4+\varepsilon} and are pending: a forum claim of 2026-07-29 produced by GPT 5.6-Pro and submitted by Samuel Korsky, with a partial Lean formalization (claim page), and the arXiv preprint of Durkan and Pearce-Crump of 2026-07-31, which its abstract states settles Harper's conjecture for both the Steinhaus and the Rademacher model (claim page).

Source. erdosproblems.com/520, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #520, https://www.erdosproblems.com/520.

References.

  • [Ca24b] R. Caich, Almost sure upper bound for random multiplicative functions. arXiv:2304.00943 (2024).
  • [Ha13] Harper, Adam J., Bounds on the suprema of Gaussian processes, and omega results for the sum of a random multiplicative function. Ann. Appl. Probab. (2013), 584-616.
  • [LTW13] Lau, Yuk-Kam and Tenenbaum, Gérald and Wu, Jie, On mean values of random multiplicative functions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (2013), 409-420.
  • [Wi44] Wintner, Aurel, Random factorizations and Riemann's hypothesis. Duke Math. J. (1944), 267-275.

Formalization. Statement in the file ErdosProblems/520.lean of formal-conjectures, pinned at the file's last change of 2026-09-18: erdos_520, with the answer False, tagged research solved with a formal_proof attribute naming src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos520.lean in Boris Alexeev's repository plby/lean-proofs, a file whose header declares it a formalization by Høystad, with GPT-5.6 Pro and Claude Fable 5, from the v1.1.0 tag of his repository. The file states two theorems, normalized_tendsto_zero (almost surely the normalized sums tend to 00) and not_erdos_520 (no positive constant is the almost sure limit superior), for a model that is exactly the problem's Rademacher model; the catalog's statement quantifies over every family satisfying its IsRademacherMultiplicative predicate, and the catalog's change records a separately compiled bridge from that model to its statement, which matters only for the catalog's statement over all such models. That file is a formalization link on the Høystad claim page and gets no page of its own. This corpus built plby/lean-proofs at its commit of 2026-09-15, the repository's port of the v1.1.0 development to Lean v4.33.0, checked the axioms of both theorems, matched their fingerprints to the repository's comparator challenge and audited their statements, as the claim page records; the formalized evidence does not cover the development's (log⁡log⁡N)1/4+η(\log\log N)^{1/4+\eta} bound itself.

Current assessment

The standing is solved and disproved through one accepted full claim, the Høystad claim, on formalized evidence: this corpus built the port of his Lean development in plby/lean-proofs, found the axioms of not_erdos_520 and normalized_tendsto_zero to be the three standard ones, matched both to the repository's comparator challenge and audited their statements clause by clause against the Statement above. The site labels the problem OPEN; its proof-claims tab carries two full claims with no comments, and the community database records the problem open; the accepted claim has no review by the site and no refereed version. The three claims assert one theorem, an almost sure upper bound with the exponent 1/4+ε1/4+\varepsilon on the iterated logarithm, which is Harper's conjectured sharp exponent; the formalized evidence certifies the answer no, not that bound, and the claims of Korsky and of Durkan and Pearce-Crump are pending. Search scope: the site's problem page and proof-claims tab (2026-10-06), the arXiv record of Durkan and Pearce-Crump (2026-10-07), the formal-conjectures statement file and the community database entry; no literature search beyond these sources.

Progress

Three full claims of 2026 assert one theorem, the almost sure bound ∑m≤Nf(m)≪N(log⁡log⁡N)1/4+ε\sum_{m\le N}f(m)\ll\sqrt N(\log\log N)^{1/4+\varepsilon}, which makes the limit superior in the question 00 and answers it no. The negative answer is accepted through Høystad's Lean development, whose compared theorems this corpus built and audited; the claims are recorded under Known Results and on the claim pages under claims/.

Known Results

Accepted on formalized evidence, Høystad's Lean development: the formal-conjectures catalog tagged its statement of the problem research solved with a linked formal proof on 2026-09-18, crediting Høystad 2026, while the site labels the problem OPEN and the community database records it open. The linked file, src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos520.lean in Boris Alexeev's repository plby/lean-proofs, is a 35-line wrapper whose header declares it a formalization by Høystad with GPT-5.6 Pro and Claude Fable 5 from the v1.1.0 tag of his repository. It derives two theorems from the development's unconditional ones: normalized_tendsto_zero, that almost surely ∣∑m≤Nf(m)∣/Nlog⁡log⁡N→0|\sum_{m\le N}f(m)|/\sqrt{N\log\log N}\to0, and not_erdos_520, that no constant c>0c>0 is almost surely the limit superior. Their model is exactly the problem's: independent fair signs on the primes, products over the prime factors on squarefree integers, 00 elsewhere, and the partial sums normalized by Nlog⁡log⁡N\sqrt{N\log\log N}. The catalog's statement quantifies over every family satisfying its IsRademacherMultiplicative predicate, and the catalog's change records a separately compiled bridge to that statement, which matters only for the catalog's statement over all such models. This corpus built the repository at its commit of 2026-09-15 (the port of the v1.1.0 development to Lean v4.33.0), checked that both theorems use only the three standard axioms, found their fingerprints identical to the repository's comparator challenge and audited their statements against the question above, so the Høystad claim is accepted; the evidence does not cover the development's (log⁡log⁡N)1/4+η(\log\log N)^{1/4+\eta} bound, which no challenge compares. The claim was registered on the site's proof-claims page on 2026-08-04 as a self-contained Lean proof that the Rademacher sums are almost surely ≪N(log⁡log⁡N)1/4+η\ll\sqrt N(\log\log N)^{1/4+\eta} for every η>0\eta>0; no refereed version, site acceptance or independent review was found.

The site's proof-claims tab also carries the full claim of 2026-07-29 submitted by Samuel Korsky, an argument produced by GPT 5.6-Pro that sharpens Caich's almost sure bound to Harper's exponent 1/4+ε1/4+\varepsilon by a conditional high-moment estimate on each block of primes, with a partial Lean formalization by Korsky and Victor Reis that takes five inputs from Caich's paper as hypotheses (claim page). The same bound, for both the Steinhaus and the Rademacher model, is the theorem of Durkan and Pearce-Crump's arXiv preprint of 2026-07-31, stated there as settling Harper's conjecture (claim page). Both are pending; the site labels the problem OPEN.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.