Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 520
claims/: The 3 claim pages of Problem 520, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. Let be a Rademacher multiplicative function: a random -valued multiplicative function, where for each prime we independently choose uniformly at random, and for square-free integers we extend (and if is not squarefree). Does there exist some constant such that, almost surely,
Status. The site labels the problem OPEN. The derived
standing is solved with the claim disproved, through the self-contained Lean
development submitted by Sigurd Høystad on 2026-08-04
(claim page):
this corpus built the port of that development in plby/lean-proofs at its
commit of 2026-09-15, written for Lean v4.33.0, and audited the port's two
compared theorems, that almost surely
and that no constant is almost surely the limit superior in the question.
Two further full claims assert the same sharpening of Caich's almost sure bound
to and are pending:
a forum claim of 2026-07-29 produced by GPT 5.6-Pro and submitted by Samuel
Korsky, with a partial Lean formalization
(claim page),
and the arXiv preprint of Durkan and Pearce-Crump of 2026-07-31, which its
abstract states settles Harper's conjecture for both the Steinhaus and the
Rademacher model
(claim page).
Source. erdosproblems.com/520, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #520, https://www.erdosproblems.com/520.
References.
- [Ca24b] R. Caich, Almost sure upper bound for random multiplicative functions. arXiv:2304.00943 (2024).
- [Ha13] Harper, Adam J., Bounds on the suprema of Gaussian processes, and omega results for the sum of a random multiplicative function. Ann. Appl. Probab. (2013), 584-616.
- [LTW13] Lau, Yuk-Kam and Tenenbaum, Gérald and Wu, Jie, On mean values of random multiplicative functions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (2013), 409-420.
- [Wi44] Wintner, Aurel, Random factorizations and Riemann's hypothesis. Duke Math. J. (1944), 267-275.
Formalization. Statement in the file
ErdosProblems/520.lean
of formal-conjectures, pinned at the file's last change of 2026-09-18:
erdos_520, with the answer False, tagged research solved with a
formal_proof attribute naming src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos520.lean in
Boris Alexeev's repository plby/lean-proofs, a file whose header declares
it a formalization by Høystad, with GPT-5.6 Pro and Claude Fable 5, from the
v1.1.0 tag of his repository. The file states two theorems,
normalized_tendsto_zero (almost surely the normalized sums tend to )
and not_erdos_520 (no positive constant is the almost sure limit
superior), for a model that is exactly the problem's Rademacher model; the
catalog's statement quantifies over every family satisfying its
IsRademacherMultiplicative predicate, and the catalog's change records a
separately compiled bridge from that model to its statement, which matters
only for the catalog's statement over all such models. That file is a
formalization link on the
Høystad claim page
and gets no page of its own. This corpus built plby/lean-proofs at its
commit of 2026-09-15, the repository's port of the v1.1.0 development to
Lean v4.33.0, checked the axioms of both theorems, matched their
fingerprints to the repository's comparator challenge and audited their
statements, as the claim page records; the formalized evidence does not
cover the development's bound itself.
Current assessment
The standing is solved and disproved through one accepted full claim, the
Høystad claim,
on formalized evidence: this corpus built the port of his Lean development in
plby/lean-proofs, found the axioms of not_erdos_520 and
normalized_tendsto_zero to be the three standard ones, matched both to the
repository's comparator challenge and audited their statements clause by clause
against the Statement above. The site labels the problem OPEN; its proof-claims tab carries two full claims with no comments, and the community
database records the problem open; the accepted claim has no review by the site
and no refereed version. The three claims assert one theorem, an almost sure
upper bound with the exponent on the iterated logarithm, which
is Harper's conjectured sharp exponent; the formalized evidence certifies the
answer no, not that bound, and the claims of Korsky and of Durkan and
Pearce-Crump are pending. Search scope: the site's problem page and proof-claims
tab (2026-10-06), the arXiv record of Durkan and Pearce-Crump (2026-10-07), the
formal-conjectures statement file and the community database entry; no
literature search beyond these sources.
Progress
Three full claims of 2026 assert one theorem, the almost sure bound
, which makes
the limit superior in the question and answers it no. The negative
answer is accepted through Høystad's Lean development, whose compared
theorems this corpus built and audited; the claims are recorded under Known
Results and on the claim pages under claims/.
Known Results
Accepted on formalized evidence, Høystad's Lean development: the
formal-conjectures catalog tagged its statement of the problem research solved
with a linked formal proof on 2026-09-18, crediting Høystad 2026, while the site
labels the problem OPEN and the community database records it open. The linked
file, src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos520.lean in Boris Alexeev's repository
plby/lean-proofs, is a 35-line wrapper whose header declares it a
formalization by Høystad with GPT-5.6 Pro and Claude Fable 5 from the v1.1.0
tag of his repository. It derives two theorems from the development's
unconditional ones: normalized_tendsto_zero, that almost surely
, and not_erdos_520, that no
constant is almost surely the limit superior. Their model is exactly the
problem's: independent fair signs on the primes, products over the prime factors
on squarefree integers, elsewhere, and the partial sums normalized by
. The catalog's statement quantifies over every family
satisfying its IsRademacherMultiplicative predicate, and the catalog's change
records a separately compiled bridge to that statement, which matters only for
the catalog's statement over all such models. This corpus built the repository
at its commit of 2026-09-15 (the port of the v1.1.0 development to Lean
v4.33.0), checked that both theorems use only the three standard axioms, found
their fingerprints identical to the repository's comparator challenge and
audited their statements against the question above, so the
Høystad claim
is accepted; the evidence does not cover the development's
bound, which no challenge compares. The claim was
registered on the site's proof-claims page on 2026-08-04 as a self-contained
Lean proof that the Rademacher sums are almost surely
for every ; no refereed version,
site acceptance or independent review was found.
The site's proof-claims tab also carries the full claim of 2026-07-29 submitted by Samuel Korsky, an argument produced by GPT 5.6-Pro that sharpens Caich's almost sure bound to Harper's exponent by a conditional high-moment estimate on each block of primes, with a partial Lean formalization by Korsky and Victor Reis that takes five inputs from Caich's paper as hypotheses (claim page). The same bound, for both the Steinhaus and the Rademacher model, is the theorem of Durkan and Pearce-Crump's arXiv preprint of 2026-07-31, stated there as settling Harper's conjecture (claim page). Both are pending; the site labels the problem OPEN.
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.
- caich_2023_almost_sure_upper_bound_random_multiplicative
- harper_2013_bounds_suprema_gaussian_processes_omega_results
- harper_2013_bounds_suprema_gaussian_processes_omega_results / corollary_2
- harper_2013_bounds_suprema_gaussian_processes_omega_results / corollary_3
- lau_2013_mean_values_random_multiplicative_functions
- lau_2013_mean_values_random_multiplicative_functions / theorem_1_1