Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 1064

../

claims/: The 2 claim pages of Problem 1064, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Prove that ϕ(n)>ϕ(n−ϕ(n))\phi(n)>\phi(n-\phi(n)) for almost all nn, but that ϕ(n)<ϕ(n−ϕ(n))\phi(n)<\phi(n-\phi(n)) for infinitely many nn, where ϕ\phi is Euler's totient function.

Status. Proved (the site's label). The answer to both parts is yes, and the page lists the two parts as almost_all and infinitely_often. Luca and Pomerance [LuPo02] prove the first inequality on a set of density one, by a margin of any order below nn, refereed in Colloquium Mathematicum and credited by the site, which the corpus accepts on the claim page [[problems/arithmetic_functions/E1064/claims/2002_01_01_luca_pomerance|Luca and Pomerance 2002]] as settling the first part. The second inequality was proved by Grytczuk, Luca and Wójtowicz [GLW01], with a gap growing like 2k2^k along explicit families; they also gave the first inequality a lower density of at least 0.540.54. The site credits the infinitude to that paper, and the corpus accepts it on [[problems/arithmetic_functions/E1064/claims/2001_07_01_grytczuk_luca_wojtowicz|Grytczuk, Luca and Wójtowicz 2001]] as settling the second part. Luca and Pomerance state the second inequality in the stronger form ϕ(n)<c ϕ(n−ϕ(n))\phi(n)<c\,\phi(n-\phi(n)) for every c>0c>0 as a remark without proof, and for the infinite families they cite [GLW01].

Source. erdosproblems.com/1064, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1064, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1064.

References.

  • [GLW01] Grytczuk, A. and Luca, F. and Wójtowicz, M., A conjecture of Erdős concerning inequalities for the Euler totient function. Publ. Math. Debrecen (2001), 9-16.
  • [Gu04] Guy, Richard K., Unsolved problems in number theory. Third edition, Problem Books in Mathematics, Springer, New York (2004), xviii+437 pp.; doi:10.1007/978-0-387-26677-0. Section B42 "Behavior of ϕ(σ(n))\phi(\sigma(n)) and σ(ϕ(n))\sigma(\phi(n))", p. 150, opens by asking for the two inequalities of the statement. Library home: guy_2004_unsolved_problems_number_theory.
  • [Er80f] Erdős, P., Research problems: How many pairs of products of consecutive integers have the same prime factors? Amer. Math. Monthly (1980), 391-392 (MR 1539384). The site's reference record gives this key that entry, which it shares with Problem 850 and whose subject is products of consecutive integers. The totient conjecture of this problem is Erdős's Proposed problem P. 294, Canad. Math. Bull. 23 (1980), 505, which Luca and Pomerance cite for it ([8] of [LuPo02]).
  • [LuPo02] Luca, Florian and Pomerance, Carl, On some problems of M\polhk akowski-Schinzel and Erd\H os concerning the arithmetical functions ϕ\phi and σ\sigma. Colloq. Math. (2002), 111-130.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures.

Current assessment

The question, as the site states it (page last edited 2025-10-06), has two parts, listed in the frontmatter as almost_all and infinitely_often: that ϕ(n)>ϕ(n−ϕ(n))\phi(n)>\phi(n-\phi(n)) for almost all nn, and that the reverse inequality holds for infinitely many nn. The second part is elementary: for n=15⋅2kn=15\cdot2^k with k≥1k\ge1 one has ϕ(n)=4⋅2k\phi(n)=4\cdot2^k and ϕ(n−ϕ(n))=ϕ(11⋅2k)=5⋅2k\phi(n-\phi(n))=\phi(11\cdot2^k)=5\cdot2^k. Equality also occurs infinitely often, for instance at n=3⋅2kn=3\cdot2^k with k≥1k\ge1, where both totients equal 2k2^k. Grytczuk, Luca and Wójtowicz [GLW01] proved the second part with the gap ϕ(n)+2k≤ϕ(n−ϕ(n))\phi(n)+2^k\le\phi(n-\phi(n)) along the families n=3m⋅2kn=3m\cdot2^k, k≥1k\ge1, with m>1m>1 odd, coprime to 33 and 3m−ϕ(m)3m-\phi(m) prime, and showed that the first inequality holds on a set of lower density at least 0.540.54. Luca and Pomerance [LuPo02] then proved the first part, their Theorem 3(i): for any positive ε(x)→0\varepsilon(x)\to0 the inequality ϕ(n−ϕ(n))<ϕ(n)−nε(n)\phi(n-\phi(n))<\phi(n)-n\varepsilon(n) holds for almost all nn. They remark, without giving a proof, that the method of their Theorem 2 shows the value set of ϕ(n−ϕ(n))/ϕ(n)\phi(n-\phi(n))/\phi(n) to be dense in [0,∞][0,\infty], so that ϕ(n)<c ϕ(n−ϕ(n))\phi(n)<c\,\phi(n-\phi(n)) holds infinitely often for every c>0c>0; for the second part itself they cite the infinite families of [GLW01]. The site's commentary describes that stronger statement as proved; the paper is the source, and the corpus records it as a remark. Both papers are refereed and the site credits each with its part; the two claim pages carry the acceptance, each settling one part. The community database lists the problem proved, with its statement formalized and no formal proof. The formal-conjectures file states the density-one theorem erdos_1064 and its margin variant erdos_1064.variants.general_function with sorry, and proves erdos_1064.variants.k2, that ϕ(n)<ϕ(n−ϕ(n))\phi(n)<\phi(n-\phi(n)) for infinitely many nn, through the family n=30⋅2kn=30\cdot2^k (ϕ(30⋅2k)=8⋅2k\phi(30\cdot2^k)=8\cdot2^k and ϕ(22⋅2k)=10⋅2k\phi(22\cdot2^k)=10\cdot2^k), citing [GLW01]; the corpus has not built it. A Lean file in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs repository declares itself a formalization of Luca and Pomerance's solution and is linked from their claim page; the corpus has not built or audited it either, so neither page lists formalized evidence. Neither paper's proof is compiled in this wiki; the digests on the library cards ([[../library/arithmetic_functions/grytczuk_2001_conjecture_erdos_concerning_inequalities_euler_totient/_index|Grytczuk, Luca and Wójtowicz 2001]], [[../library/arithmetic_functions/luca_2002_problems_makowski_schinzel_erdos/_index|Luca and Pomerance 2002]]) cover the statements. Guy's Problem B42 [Gu04] records the question without a solution.

Search scope: the site's problem page as exported (last edited 2025-10-06), the community database entry, the formal-conjectures file, the lean-proofs file and the two library cards; no forum proof claim and no OpenAI release item names this problem. No wider literature search was made, none being needed for refereed answers the site credits.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.