Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 434

../

claims/: The 2 claim pages of Problem 434, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let k≤nk\leq n. What choice of A⊆{1,…,n}A\subseteq \{1,\ldots,n\} (with gcd(A)=1\mathrm{gcd}(A)=1) of size ∣A∣=k\lvert A\rvert=k maximises the number of integers not representable as the sum of finitely many elements from AA (with repetitions allowed)? Is it {n,n−1,…,n−k+1}\{n,n-1,\ldots,n-k+1\}?

Formulation. The site's wording (page last edited 31 October 2025). Read literally, k≤nk\leq n admits k=1k=1, where gcd(A)=1\mathrm{gcd}(A)=1 leaves only A={1}A=\{1\} and the proposed set {n}\{n\} is admissible only for n=1n=1, so the second question fails trivially for k=1<nk=1<n. Kiss restates Erdős and Graham's question as his Theorem 1 under the hypothesis 1<n≤t1<n\le t (his nn is the problem's kk, his tt the problem's nn), so the question concerns 2≤k≤n2\le k\le n; he and the site's commentary read its first question as asking for a maximizing set, not for every maximizer, and the formal-conjectures statement reads it the same way (hypothesis 2≤k2\le k, with a note on k=1k=1). The claim pages and the derived frontmatter standing address that question, on which the maximizer is in general not unique (Kiss's Theorem 2).

Status. PROVED (LEAN): the site's label; its commentary credits Kiss with the proof, and the frontmatter standing is derived from the accepted claim page Kiss's theorem, accepted on the site's credit and the journal publication; the Lean part of the label refers to a separate AI-assisted Lean proof arguing from Dixmier's theorem, recorded as the claimed page Lean proof through Dixmier's interval theorem, which this corpus has not built or audited.

Source. erdosproblems.com/434, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #434, https://www.erdosproblems.com/434.

References.

  • [Ki02] Kiss, G., On the extremal Frobenius problem in a new aspect. Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapest. Eötvös Sect. Math. (2002), 139-142.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures. Its formal_proof attribute points at the forum post recorded on the Lean proof's claim page.

Progress

Not yet compiled.

Known Results

Not yet compiled.