Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. K. Győry, L. Hajdu and N. Saradha, On the Diophantine equation n(n+d)⋯(n+(k−1)d)=byln(n+d)\cdots(n+(k-1)d)=by^l, Canad. Math. Bull. 47 (2004), no. 3, 373--388. For positive integers n,d,y,bn,d,y,b, integers k,ℓ≥2k,\ell\ge2, gcd⁡(n,d)=1\gcd(n,d)=1, P(b)≤kP(b)\le k and bb free of ℓ\ellth powers (printed p. 373), Theorem 1 (printed p. 374) states that the equation has no solution when k=4k=4 or 55 and b=1b=1: a product of four or five consecutive positive terms of a coprime arithmetic progression is never a perfect power. The case ℓ=2\ell=2 is taken from Euler (k=4k=4) and from Obláth (k=5k=5). Bennett, Bruin, Győry and Hajdu (2006, printed pp. 273--274) found the paper's argument for ℓ=3\ell=3 invalid and corrected it in their Section 5, so the theorem holds with that corrected proof. Library home: gyory_2004_diophantine_equation. These are the lengths k=4k=4 and k=5k=5 of Problem 672.

Covers. Lengths k=4k=4 and k=5k=5, every dd and every exponent ℓ≥2\ell\ge2. Not covered: every length k≥6k\ge6.

Depends on. Bennett–Bruin–Győry–Hajdu (the corrected proof for ℓ=3\ell=3) and Obláth (the case k=5k=5, ℓ=2\ell=2).

Acceptance. Refereed: Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 47 (2004), no. 3. The site's commentary credits the theorem, but the site labels the problem VERIFIABLE, an open label, so the commentary is not reviewed evidence.