Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 798
claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 798, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. Let be the minimum number of points in such that the lines determined by these points cover all points in .
Estimate . In particular, is it true that ?
Status. PROVED (LEAN). The site credits the resolution to Alon [Al91]; the claim page Alon records the result and its acceptance.
Source. erdosproblems.com/798, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #798, https://www.erdosproblems.com/798.
References.
- [Al91] Alon, N., Economical coverings of sets of lattice points. Geom. Funct. Anal. 1 (1991), no. 3, 225-230.
Formalization. Statement in
formal-conjectures,
tagged research solved with a sorry proof and a formal_proof attribute
naming a third-party Lean proof of Alon's bound, at the main revision of
2026-09-18 read; the claim page links that proof and the forum posting it
copies.
Current assessment
The site's formulation asks for an estimate of , the least number of grid points whose connecting lines cover , and in particular whether . Alon (Geom. Funct. Anal. 1 (1991), 225–230) proves , so the particular question has the answer yes, and with the Erdős–Purdy lower bound the order of is known up to a factor of ; which side of that gap is the truth remains open, and the site counts the problem resolved. The standing rests on the single accepted claim page, whose evidence is the refereed publication and the site curator's credit. Two third-party Lean formalizations of Alon's upper bound, one posted to the site's forum on 2026-05-08 with the Aristotle system and its copy in a public repository, are the site's Lean qualifier; neither has been built here, and no part of the mathematics has been independently reviewed by this project.
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.