Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 945

../


Statement. Let F(x)F(x) be the maximal kk such that there exist n+1,…,n+k≤xn+1,\ldots,n+k\leq x with τ(n+1),…,τ(n+k)\tau(n+1),\ldots,\tau(n+k) all distinct (where τ(m)\tau(m) counts the divisors of mm). Estimate F(x)F(x). In particular, is it true that

F(x)≤(log⁡x)O(1)?F(x) \leq (\log x)^{O(1)}?

In other words, is there a constant C>0C>0 such that, for all large xx, every interval [x,x+(log⁡x)C][x,x+(\log x)^C] contains two integers with the same number of divisors?

Status. Open.

Source. erdosproblems.com/945, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #945, https://www.erdosproblems.com/945.

References.

  • [Er85e] Erdős, P., Some problems and results in number theory. Number theory and combinatorics. Japan 1984 (Tokyo, Okayama and Kyoto, 1984) (1985), 65-87.
  • [ErMi52] Erdős, P. and Mirsky, L., The distribution of values of the divisor function d(n)d(n). Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) (1952), 257-271.
  • [Gu04] Guy, Richard K., Unsolved problems in number theory. Third edition, Problem Books in Mathematics, Springer, New York (2004), xviii+437 pp.; doi:10.1007/978-0-387-26677-0; section B18 "Solutions of d(n)=d(n+1)d(n)=d(n+1)", printed p. 112, where the book reports the Erdős and Mirsky question with the guess k=(ln⁡n)ck=(\ln n)^c. Library home: guy_2004_unsolved_problems_number_theory.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures.

Current assessment

The site labels the problem OPEN (page last edited 5 October 2025). Erdős and Mirsky [ErMi52] prove (log⁡x)1/2/log⁡log⁡x≪F(x)≪exp⁡(O((log⁡x)1/2/log⁡log⁡x))(\log x)^{1/2}/\log\log x\ll F(x)\ll\exp(O((\log x)^{1/2}/\log\log x)) (card); the upper bound comes from their count of the distinct values of τ\tau up to xx. A note by Adrian Beker, linked in the site's thread on 3 October 2025, lowers the upper bound to exp⁡(O((log⁡x)1/3+o(1)))\exp(O((\log x)^{1/3+o(1)})). Neither bound decides whether F(x)≤(log⁡x)O(1)F(x)\le(\log x)^{O(1)}, so neither is a claim. The site also reports Cambie's observation that Cramér's conjecture, or a squarefree number in every interval of length ≫log⁡x\gg\log x in [x,2x][x,2x], would give F(x)≪(log⁡x)2F(x)\ll(\log x)^2. That is a conditional yes to whether F(x)≤(log⁡x)O(1)F(x)\le(\log x)^{O(1)}, but no manuscript of it is linked, so it has no claim page. Erdős [Er85e] said the lower bound could be raised to (log⁡x)1−o(1)(\log x)^{1-o(1)} but gave no proof.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.