Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Joos and Mubayi, Ramsey theory constructions from hypergraph matchings, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 152 (2024), no. 11, 4537--4550, DOI 10.1090/proc/16413 (published online 2024-09-20); arXiv:2208.12563, first version 2022-08-26, the claim's date. Library home: joos_2022_ramsey_theory_constructions_hypergraph_matchings.

The result. For graphs GG and HH, r(G,H,q)r(G,H,q) is the least number of colors in an edge-coloring of GG giving every copy of HH at least qq colors, so r(Kn,K4,5)r(K_n,K_4,5) is the problem's f(n)f(n). Equation (2) of the paper:

r(Kn,K4,5)=5n6+o(n).r(K_n,K_4,5)=\frac{5n}6+o(n).

The lower bound is Erdős and Gyárfás's; the upper bound comes from translating the coloring requirement into an almost perfect matching of an auxiliary hypergraph that avoids a specified conflict system, and applying the conflict-free hypergraph matching theorem of Glock, Joos, Kim, Kühn and Lichev (the paper's Theorem 2.1). The paper presents (2) as a new, much shorter proof of the result of Bennett, Cushman, Dudek and Prałat, whose process analysis it replaces and whose result it does not use. As on the companion claim page, the problem's instruction to determine the size of f(n)f(n) is read as asking for the constant cc in f(n)∼cnf(n)\sim cn, and the exact value of f(n)f(n) is not known.

Depends on. [[problems/extremal_graph_theory/E0136/claims/1997_12_01_erdos_gyarfas|Erdős and Gyárfás's lower bound]], which the paper does not prove; the external matching theorem is cited, not reproved.

Acceptance. Refereed publication in the Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, cited with its venue above. The site's curator, Thomas Bloom, marks the problem SOLVED and credits this paper, under the reference [JoMu22], with a shorter proof of the asymptotic in the commentary; that credit is the reviewed evidence, and Bloom took no part in the paper. The two independent proofs of one asymptotic corroborate each other. No independent review of the argument was made here, and no proof step was checked beyond the statement and the method's description.