Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. Theorem 2(a) of Zs. Tuza, Covering all cliques of a graph, Discrete Math. 86 (1990), no. 1--3, 117--126 (issue of December 1990, the claim's date; received 28 August 1986), p. 119: "Let GG be a chordal graph on nn vertices. Then τC(G)≤n/2\tau_C(G) \leq n/2, and equality holds if and only if GG contains a perfect matching EME_M such that every ei∈EMe_i \in E_M is a cut-edge of GG." Here τC(G)\tau_C(G) is the least number of vertices meeting every maximal clique on at least two vertices, the τ(G)\tau(G) of Problem 151. Since τ(G)\tau(G) is an integer, τ(G)≤⌊n/2⌋\tau(G)\le\lfloor n/2\rfloor. The complete bipartite graph K⌊n/2⌋,⌈n/2⌉K_{\lfloor n/2\rfloor,\lceil n/2\rceil} is triangle-free with independence number ⌈n/2⌉\lceil n/2\rceil, so H(n)≤⌈n/2⌉H(n)\le\lceil n/2\rceil for n≥2n\ge2, and every chordal graph on nn vertices satisfies τ(G)≤⌊n/2⌋=n−⌈n/2⌉≤n−H(n)\tau(G)\le\lfloor n/2\rfloor=n-\lceil n/2\rceil\le n-H(n) (for n=1n=1 both sides are 00).

The bound itself is older. Tuza credits the case to Aigner and Andreae (a manuscript of 1986, which he cites as unpublished) and gives his own short proof through a perfect elimination order. Erdős, Gallai and Tuza (Discrete Math. 108 (1992), p. 281) record that chordal graphs have the ⟨2⟩\langle2\rangle-property, τC(G)≤∣V(G)∣/2\tau_C(G)\le|V(G)|/2, citing the same manuscript and Tuza's paper, and Erdős (Discrete Math. 72 (1988), p. 82) reports Gallai's conjecture that the cliques of a chordal graph on nn vertices can be met by [n/2][n/2] vertices as "indeed proved by Aigner, Andreae and Tuza". Tuza's paper is the first publication of a proof, and its card is Tuza 1990.

Covers. The inequality τ(G)≤n−H(n)\tau(G)\le n-H(n) for every chordal graph, of any order. Graphs that are not chordal are not addressed.

Depends on. No page of this wiki; the step from n/2n/2 to n−H(n)n-H(n) is the one line above.

Acceptance. Refereed: the paper is a publication in Discrete Mathematics, and it thanks the referee. The site does not mention the chordal case, so no curator credit applies.